putting a turd in the stew doesn't help the taste even if you call it seasoning

[Guest guest]

mindmastery-essentialskills , " docspeed2001 "

<docspeed2001 wrote:

>

> > > thing writes:

> > >Our system was Traditional American Karate,

>

> >docspeed2001 writes:

> >Sorry, in my 56 years in the martial arts there is NO TRADITIONAL

> >AMERICAN KARATE!

>

> >In fact R. Trias was the first one to teach karate in the states

> >and that was in 1952. Something that is 54 years olds is NOT

> >traditional.

>

> >Now Ed Parker formulated his American Kenpo Karate in 1956 at

> >Brigham Young University, based upon teachings given him by

William

> >Chow of Hawaii, which were based upon specific Chinese styles

that

> >are hundreds of years old, going back to 1200 ad.

>

> >So, what is YOUR definition of " traditional " ?

 

Doc, are you giving me permission to be sweet little old me?

 

If you are, let me politely rip her a new one as she justly deserves.

 

If it is too tearing, then just delete the post and not allow it

through.

 

> Uhm....maybe I didn't make myself clear or state things in your

> vernacular?

 

I read your original post sweetie pie and you were not clear in any

vernacular that intelligent people speak. You spoke about the

clarity level of a 10 year old fluff head pot smoker that is on

cocaine.

 

> That WAS my point, that Master Burk did take basic

 

Mr Burk has nothing to do with your original topic. Using his name

is a proganda red herring, with you hoping to divert our attention

off of the fact that you do not have a clue.

 

Mr. Burk is not a master. And he is self-promoted doing only forms

and his fake spiritual stuff. Most who want martial arts are looking

for someone with enough skill to kick the crap out of the street

puke. Your self-promoted fraud cannot do that so he's not even good

for toilet paper.

 

> principles and more than one style, change it and make that HIS

> system with a new name,

 

This is fraud to me.

 

>thus to be peddled to the impatient American

> student who won't stand for many of the slower, precise teachings

>of the ancients.

 

This is faulty reasonings to back up an inferior martial arts

product and his fraud.

 

> I didn't say I agree,

 

Linguistically you just said, " I xx agree " , and that is how your

statement is taken by those that hear you. It's a hypnotic device of

covert installation that did not work here.

 

> we just happened to study under

> him, via the city recreation program that he ran locally. I know

> all about Ed Parker, et al and all the ancient history,

 

Saying that you know something, but speaking as if you know nothing,

tells me you know nothing. And if you don't know, why not shut your

face?

 

> thanks to

> later teachers that insisted we did need that info, instead of the

> bastardized stuff that passes for karate in some places today.

 

You are talking about bastardized stuff, but you trained with a man

that bastardized stuff. Why is that? Are you one of those 6 month

kiddie black belts?

 

Your

> websites and credentials tout that Black Belt magazine loves your

> stuff....if so, Master Burk's name should at least ring a bell.

 

Why your snide remark and condemnation of Dr. La Tourrette? If you

want to say something, then say it loud and clear.

 

And your original post was a sleaze pot of faulty information and

insinuations about chakra clearing for helping cataracts. Why are

you not following through with an explanation on how to do that?

 

Is it because you are a fraud and don't have a fxxking clue?

 

> I was not tying it into specific Chakras, et al....even if one of

my

> Tai Chi instructors did.

 

Oh goody.

 

Your inferior attempt to add validity to what you said by

referencing someone else was a total failure. To be able to use that

technique, first the information needs to be on topic, then the

information needs to be true, and last but not least the information

needs to have specific names and locations with references. If not,

then it is not believed.

 

Your stuff is not believed.

 

> But that's because that particular

> instructor was using it AS a healing art, not a martial art.

 

Maybe you better get webster's and look up the word 'martial'.

 

Here, let me help you. " Pertaining to war " . Did that help? If not,

do you want to spar? Maybe the feel of getting slugged in the mouth

or getting kicked in the groin so hard that the crack of your ass

meets the back of your skull would get your attention?

 

> Again....the mindset of the instructor can change the whole

> program.

 

Whoopy doo.

 

> I was suggesting that ENERGY AND HEALING also is

> undergoing changes just as slight...or profound.

 

No you weren't.

 

You stated that clearing the chakras in a downward way was much

better than clearing them from the root chakra up for healing

cataracts. And the guy you said you did that with still has

cataracts.

 

And you've done nothing to verify your " lip sprueing " , expect pout.

 

Where's the evidence? Where is the reference materials? Where is

your experience where you've actually done both, many times over and

have noticed the difference and noticed the similiarities?

 

>I hoped using

> examples of martial arts systems being altered from the original

> tenents thousands of years ago would make sense in replying to you

&

> speak to your experience.

 

Who are you to even know what Doc's experiences are?

 

You only reference his 56 years of marital arts experience, but I

bet you've never met him, never studied under him, never read any of

his 28 books, have never watched his 490+ videos and DVDS on the

martial arts, not counting his 720 DVD's on healing, mind training,

Kahuna Training and Energy Psychology. You know nothing about his

educational background. You know nothing about his teaching skills,

his 39 years of doing and teaching energy chi kung. You do not know

about his 40 odd years as a hypnosis trainer, nothing about his

skills at energy medicine. Nothing about his being a leading edge

developer for Silva Ultra Mind ESP. Nothing about his NLP modeling

expertise. Nothing about him being a world class healer in many

different modalities. B,ab, blab, blab.

 

You, because you have a mouth and can speak, are attempting to

feebily deny and avoid any type of explanation to the skills that

you profess to have.

 

Shame on you!

 

> example. Personally, I feel for myself that violent martial arts

> forms would be at odds if I was intent on healing arts....but it

> appears your teachings are more toward the agressive?

 

You think the doc is aggressive so therefore his healing skills must

not be of very high quality?

 

Once again you show your supreme lack of any skill in anything. No

skill in the martial arts. No skill in healing. And virtually no

skill in communications.

 

If you cannot back up what you state, get out of the kitchen.

 

(I'm ignoring much of her postulations since they are puffery and

non-valid pathetic excuses for not knowing anything.)

 

> I also didn't say anywhere that I plan to teach anything

energetic,

> nor do I need to explain to anyone what I do or don't do.

 

The reason you cannot explain what you do is because you don't have

a fxxking clue about anything that you do and don't do. I'm

surprised you can find a toilet and use it successfully. " let's see,

do I sit down or stand up? I'm a woman so there must be a clue

there. But that sink looks about right if I stand on a stool " , etc.

 

I'm more

> the student still than anything else....but I've seen what has

> changed between our generation(assuming you are closer to 50 than

15

> with 56 years of martial arts<G>)

 

Actually Doc is in his mid 60's and still kicks ass like a 30 year

old.

 

> 3 years defies ANY teaching I've encountered before. I believe

now

> that anyone who cannot be open minded regarding what is coming

next

> could be left in the dust in the future, wondering how the world

> changed & they missed out.

 

What a stupid inaccurate installation!

 

You are now stating that " people who will not accept what you say,

because you've said it, must be closed minded " .

 

That is cowshit for brains logic! You can do better than that, can't

you? Why don't you just admit the fact that you don't have a fxxking

clue, and shut your air hole?

 

We are pretty simple people. If you say you can cure cataracts by

putting fresh horseshit on their eyeballs, then at least give us

some people that you've cured of cataracts before we attempt to put

horseshit on our own eyes. We do not expect a 20 year study and FDA

approval. Do you yet understand?

 

as we've

> I take it you have NOT met him, nor any of those that have at

> seminars the past few years?

 

Why are you throwing a turd in the stew? What Mike does or does not

do has literally nothing to do with your original post about curing

cataracts. Your post was never about anything except you stated you

cured Mike of cataracts. You are purposefully throwing out red

herrings to take our focus off the fact that you really don't know

shit about what you babble about.

 

Sandy Godheart