Guest guest Posted October 7, 2003 Report Share Posted October 7, 2003 There are several proposed mechanisms for how acupuncture might work: http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/319/7215/973 ....describes some of the theories. The theories include stimulating stress and immune responses and triggering the release of endorphins. It seems likely that some points are better stimulated than others - and that different points have somewhat different effects. Modern acupuncturists use electrical devices that measure skin resistance to locate acupuncture points. My question is whether is has been determined whether modern ideas about which places are best stimulated (in particular signals that can be objectively measured such as points of low skin resistance) match the points used traditionally. There have been various claims that this is the case - e.g.: http://www.vigneshacupuncture.com/meridian.htm However the whole idea of preferred points seems to be being disputed by some practitioners - e.g.: ``My experience of forty years exclusive practice of acupuncture suggests that acupuncture joints do not exist. [...] One can put a needle literally anywhere in the hand or foot of the appropriate patient to produce an alteration in the patient's symptoms. One does not have to needle tender areas, trigger points, hard or indurated areas, places with a reduced electrical skin resistance or even acupuncture points.'' - http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/eletters/319/7215/973#5138 So - did the ancients get their points right? or wrong? Or is it a storm in a teacup - since it is not terribly critical where the needles go? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 9, 2003 Report Share Posted October 9, 2003 I have just graduated as an acupuncturist and can only relate my experience for what its worth. I am a 5 Element practitioner and one day was treating a patient. During the treatment I found that the pulses had not changed in anyway in response to my needling. I was puzzled because this particular patient always resonded well to treatment. I suddenly realised that I had inadvertently marked 2 sets of points at the wrong cun markings and so therefore was at least 2 inches away from the relevant point. Once I reneedled the correct points the pulses improved dramatically and the patient felt a change. If I was a sceptic before this experience more than anything else has convinced me that correct point location is important. Dianna Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.