A great story does not mean it 'works'

[Guest guest]

, " Wade Smart " <wade

wrote:

>

> , Jim Knippenberg

 

> > Anyway, the person confirmed what I " two pointed, " but in my mind I was NOT

using a " two point " method, but was using a whole bunch of things Doc taught me,

and then when they described to me the " two point " I filled in the " well, if I

could do this, how the hell would I??? "

 

> > Now that I think about it... Next time I'm doing energy drills with a hot

chick, I'm going to do MY version of the two point and see how that works out

lol.... I like my version a hole lot better...

 

> > HA sorry for the crude humor. No I'm not

 

> > But anyways...

 

> > After reading Doc's post, I guess I have to now go get the stuff on Quantum

Touch even though I hadn't planned on it...

 

> > Jim

 

 

> I think in the end, however you can " work " on someone, that is the best way

for you. We assign these names to ways of doing things (EFT, QT, ME, Reiki,

etc..) and in the end - its all the same. We notice that something is off and we

are attempting to correct or change it. You can use heal or transform or 'choose

a change' but its all the same. I personally am more drawn to the more simplier

methods. ..And it all boils down to simplification. The more simple you can make

something, the more blocks you remove and the quicker and easier it becomes.

 

Well,

 

There is a point, that if you go beyond it with simplification, you have nothing

even though the person who simplified the process thinks he's got something

neat.

 

In martial arts we talk a lot about 'economy' of motion.

 

We also talked about 'wasted motion' which can either be too exaggerated to

work, or too in-effective to work.

 

In NLP we call it 'dumbing down' of the workable process into non-workable

simplicity.

 

And we have noticed that the MORE SIMPLE IT APPEARS the more complex it actually

is, and the 'expert' is into level four of competency, so that the process that

is so simple for him looks that way because he is working from well rehearsed

'habits' so that he doesn't need to think of anything but calibrate where the

client is and where the client wants to go and how-to-get him there.

 

As one Quantum Touch Trainer told me, " Donna Eden is too damn complex " .

 

So she threw away the BEST ENERGY MEDICINE ON THE PLANET because of that FALSE

paradigm that she had.

 

And in fact, when you actually study Quantum touch it is NOT easy...

 

....it is not simple...

 

But is very complex and specific.

 

> I personally looking into ME because of the speed. I " really " like >what is

being said - forget the problem - look at the end result.

 

Have you been to any of his events yet?

 

If not, go and see/feel the results he gets and doesn't get.

 

I agree with you here, " look at the end result " .

 

And the end result is NO ONE ELSE EXCEPT BARTLETT seems to be able to do it!

 

And, can he do it?

 

Well, he does tell great stories.

 

He is very good at anchors different positive states with his stories and then

anchoring those positive feelings to himself so that you believe in him even

though all verification processes are left out.

 

Anchoring, stage hypnosis and great stories are not enough to continue the

evolution of any healing system.

 

No verification processes.

 

And until that have that it will be a flash in the pan when people finally

realize it.

 

So what is this post about group?

 

John La Tourrette, PhD