is now using an NLP technology that is a convincer strategy for those that misma

[Guest guest]

--- , " Oliver Lark " <awenbendithia> wrote:

> Hello Doc

>

> Here are a few of the sources I have. They are infinitely better

than

> testemonials. The most interesting thing is that they tend to

> indicate there are far better ways of doing things:

 

Hi Doc. I find the above very cloudy. First he states his sources

are better than any testimonial. Then he gives source materials with

no clarification of why nor of how they back his premise.

 

So, to me, he's still has no clarity.

 

And because of his lack of clarity and no supporting research done

by people that are credible in the field under discussion, I see no

point in reading any further on his post, nor any of his future

emails.

 

> I respect other people's choice to use NLP or not.

 

Notice how this guy is now using an NLP technology that is a

convincer strategy for those that mismatch automatically.

 

And he's using NLP after he tells us that NLP is not valid.

 

I'm done with him. I'm pretty sure he's the same guy that keeps

cropping up here and on your other list with his dissention

statements for the past month, that you keep getting rid of. But

under a new name. Remember how I was correct about the other person,

the person that stated you were doing a BJ pattern on them?

 

Sandy