Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Statin drugs, blessing or curse?

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Duane Graveline is a former NASA scientist and physician,

now retired. His own experience with major memory loss

because of Lipitor caused him to investigate statins more

closely.

 

http://www.spacedoc.net

 

Take a look, especially if you are currently taking any

statin drug, your doctor has mentioned taking one to you or

your cholesterol level is a bit high.

 

Dr. Graveline also criticizes some of the currently

recommended cholesterol levels as being too low for good

health, such as < 70 and < 100 for those with some kind of

additional problems.

 

Browse the web site. There is much food for though there.

 

When my doctor thought about putting me on a statin drug I

had already read about Dr. Graveline's experience with

severe memory loss and told him about it. He did not push

for me to take the statins. Not all physicians are that

reasonable or willing to listen. I hope yours will be.

 

Mary Nelson

http://www.eft4everyone.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Yes, here in Sweden we have

http://www.ravnskov.nu/cholesterol.htm

 

He, Dr. Ravnskov was awarded and I believe stuff like this are

getting more and more known. There´a lot of money in this medical

industry so I guess it will take time though..

 

" " LEO Prize, for independent thinking

 

http://www.leoprize.org

 

>>This prize should reward independent research

in natural sciences and medicine.

Presently the prize sum amounts to 16,000 USD.

 

Uffe Ravnskov has been selected as the second winner

of the " Leo Prize for Independent Thinking " .

He is awarded the prize for his sharp scientific criticism

of alleged relationships between cholesterol

and cardiovascular diseases as the basis for

medication and diet recommendations.

His analyses have challenged medical establishments.

 

Background:

 

The politicization of science has created widespread

acceptance of highly questionable ideas

in certain areas of natural sciences and medicine.

This phenomenon is obviously greatly harmful to science,

but even more so for society which suffers

substantial damage from questionable or incorrect

advice emanating from the scientific community.

The reason for this unlucky development

is the acceptance of premature scientific results,

ideas or hypotheses whenever such are found

attractive by leading forces in society.

Clearly it is a task for scientists to scrutinize

and when necessary reject such ideas.

It is also an important obligation for media

to objectively communicate the results

of such efforts to the public and decision makers.

This is however a difficult and sometimes

impossible task even if the necessary insight

into the scientific issue is available.

One reason among others is that scientists

undertaking this difficult critical examination

invariably find themselves in trouble;

trouble with funding, trouble with publications,

trouble with media and trouble to get relevant response

from the administration.

Particularly cumbrous is the very strong tendency in media

to routinely give negative or no publicity to results

which put the conventional wisdom in question.

In sharp contrast, scientists promoting popular established ideas

are routinely given extensive overwhelming attention by media

and leading forces in society even when presenting ideas

which are by no means new or surprising.

We conclude that independent scientists who find themselves

in conflict with established ideas urgently need support,

in particular when issues of relevance for society are at hand.

With the prize for independent thinkers, the LEO Prize,

we hope to contribute to the challenging of conventional wisdom

by the identification and rewarding of true independent thinking

in natural sciences and medicine. "

 

 

 

--Stefan

 

 

, " M J

Nelson " <zpp4everyone wrote:

>

> Duane Graveline is a former NASA scientist and physician,

> now retired. His own experience with major memory loss

> because of Lipitor caused him to investigate statins more

> closely.

>

> http://www.spacedoc.net

>

> Take a look, especially if you are currently taking any

> statin drug, your doctor has mentioned taking one to you or

> your cholesterol level is a bit high.

>

> Dr. Graveline also criticizes some of the currently

> recommended cholesterol levels as being too low for good

> health, such as < 70 and < 100 for those with some kind of

> additional problems.

>

> Browse the web site. There is much food for though there.

>

> When my doctor thought about putting me on a statin drug I

> had already read about Dr. Graveline's experience with

> severe memory loss and told him about it. He did not push

> for me to take the statins. Not all physicians are that

> reasonable or willing to listen. I hope yours will be.

>

> Mary Nelson

> http://www.eft4everyone.com

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...