Guest guest Posted June 28, 2005 Report Share Posted June 28, 2005 , Mark Perkins <mark@o...> wrote: > Thanks, Doc....I understand now. > Shine! > Mark Damn! I guess I scared the poor guy away. Which is amazing. He had some good stuff to say, even though from my viewpoint, even he was very socialistic and communistic in his viewpoints, he was allowed to " preach " his version " AS LONG " as he could reference his viewpoint and back them up with data. Oh well. > docspeed2001 wrote: > > > , Mark Perkins > > <mark@o...> wrote: > > > Doc, > > > I'm disappointed that you felt the need to comment at the top of > > my > > > post. I posted the way I did not to influence but to provide > > additional > > > data for each of us to make our decisions and plan of action. When > > the > > > person that some view as the patriarch of the group comments on a > > post > > > before it reaches the full community, it tends to influence an > > impartial viewing of the information. > > > Shine! > > > Mark > > > Well Mark, > > > That sounds like a personal problem. > > > Your post, that I do not agree with, was posted was it not? > > > And, even though " you " stated what the article said, it did NOT say > > what you said it said, so I " informed " MY READERS of that fact, > > hoping that they'd go and read the article very closely. > > > You did want them to read it closely did you not? > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.