Modeling and Training and Manifesting...are they one and the same?

[Guest guest]

Hello Doc,

 

Since I'm currently reviewing and transcribing your

June Trainer's Training DVD's, I've also been

re-reviewing the Tad James recordings in my car the

past few days, the section on " Modeling and Training " .

 

I came across something interesting. Tad James

mentions that in almost every single modeling project

he has been involved with he found that the successful

people are doing vivid visual rehearsal, nothing new

there. However, what I thought was really

interesting is that he also said that the key is to

dissociate the images first, then to associate into

them...in that order. Why?? Because they just found

that it works that way from experience.

 

He says that the mind can't tell the difference

between a vivid visualization and a real memory. I've

heard that enough times. So if that's the case, why

does it matter which order it's done (associate vs

dissociate) when you are modeling? Is it because you

have to work in progressions toward the physical when

you model something? That is, you dissociate, then

associate into it, then actually go out and do it to

get the skill, get feedback?

 

He mentioned that the " doing " needed to follow shortly

afterwards so that the subconscious gets feedback and

reinforcement of the " imagined " skill right away.

 

He gave an example of the puppy who poops on the

floor. You have to catch them soon afterwards

(preferably when the pooping is being done by the pup)

and scold him, otherwise it doesn't register that the

pooping and the scolding are related. If you scold

him 15 minutes later he hasn't a clue why you are

scolding him. Arff! Arff! (Tads words, and good

anchor to remember this!)

 

Now.....on the other hand.....when I go to level and I

program, I associate into the final desired outcome

image first. That way it's easier for me to charge it

with as much sensory detail and feeling and imagery,

radiant energy, mana, etc, as I can, make it as

vividly real as I can, so I feel as if I am already

living it, it's my way of creating a well-formed

thought-form.

 

THEN I step out of the final outcome

image/thought-form, see it dissociated from me on my

screen in front of me, then release it and send it to

my HS, etc., to attract to it whatever it needs to

manifest. This has been working well for me. There

are some other things I do, but this is basically the

sequence I've been using.

 

That's the reverse of what Tad James says (dissociate

then associate), but then he is talking about

Modeling and Training, whereas I'm talking about

Programming on the subjective level for Manifestation

on the physical. Two different objectives aren't

they?....or are they?

 

Why do I feel like I am missing something?

 

Thanks!

 

Lori