There are legal consequences, are there not?

[Guest guest]

<jacksparrowok wrote:

>

> I just writed few weeks ago I had a delirium. I re-read the manual >of eft

today. I just know it but I preferred neurovascular. There is >write don't use

eft with serius mental illness as schizophrenia, >paranoia.

 

No there isn't.

 

But first, before I go on, there are negative consequences talking to someone

'certified' mentally disturbed.

 

What there is, is a caution that it is mandatory (or wise, depending on who has

the most fear) by the medical community to have a medical specialist there if

some person HAS BEEN LABELED as to having a mental problem (you called it

serious mental illness) by a psychologist or psychiatrist or MD.

 

And with the 'Inner Demon Destroyer™', one of it's primary parts is to have 2

different neurovasculars held AS YOU do the proper energy tapping to clear up

the perturbations in the energy fields.

 

It is ONE OF THE MOST POWERFUL methods of 'Easy Energy Tapping™'

 

Holding the neurovasculars does NOT primarily focus on removing any energy

perturbations, but does bring blood back to the 'thinking brain' that the

stressor caused to leave because of the negative aspects.

 

So now you can 'think' of what to do or not to do while those neurovasculars are

held.

 

So you do get answers.

 

Sometimes just getting positive and workable answers is enough to have a

secondary effect of clearing those negative energy perturbations locked into the

energy system by the habit field.

 

But do what you want.

 

My answer is actually for the 'trainers' on this list that are in the neat

process of combining the energy psychology aspects and the healing energy

aspects, the two MAJOR sides to the same healing system.

 

By the way, if you really have been medically labeled to have a serious mental

illness as schizophrenia or paranoia, THAN NONE OF US ON THIS LIST (according to

the administrative procedures and legalities of psychology and medicine) should

even be talking with you.

 

Without certain licenses by the state we would then be considered 'practicing'

medicine without a license, which is against the law.

 

So I was NOT talking to you, but to the rest of this list...

 

....giving THEM very workable and very valuable self-help skills.

 

So my dear sir, please ignore and delete any information I write to this list.

 

Thank you.

 

John La Tourrette, PhD