I'd get Dr. Tiller's three very complex books

[Guest guest]

, " William Leigh "

<william4x5 wrote:

 

> Theta Healing offers another structure.

 

Hi William,

 

I don't buy their structure.

 

In fact I 'think' when I compare my experiences (with healing, remote viewing &

energy work) and my training with much of their structure...

 

....they can do much better.

 

When I say 'much better' I am referencing the methodology of how they verify

what they say, and how they 'teach' what they believe.

 

(The seven planes snipped)

 

This is also close to the structure that Jose Silva gave around 1965 with his

Silva Mind Control (remember that Mind Control IS HYPNOSIS).

 

Jose did study much of Theosophy and the AMORC stuff, along with much new age

stuff.

 

And, another researcher, George W. Meek, did give similar diagrams in his 1972

book, " From Enigma To Science " on page 86.

 

> Vianna's Book give this structure in much more detail.

 

Compared to whom?

 

I think she is extrapolating from those that went before. That is called

'research', just like Blavasky did 'research' to write her books.

 

I also think she is borrowing.

 

I did enjoy her book.

 

I do suggest people interested in healing get it.

 

I also suggest they DO LIKE SHE DID and get some hypnosis training!!!

 

> At Maharishi International University, MIU, a structure was >provides showing

where the present class or topic fell into the >overall picture. Each diagram

always had the Grand Unified Field as >one of its bases and practical

applications on the other side. Good >enough teaching aid.

 

Well,

 

Now we are getting into 'druthers', for example " I'd druther this be true than

that be true, etc " .

 

I'd 'druther' be 39 again, than my actual age. But it ain't going to happen.

 

I personally dislike Transendental Meditation being taught the way it is taught.

Sort of pissed me off way back then when I took it (around 1970).

 

It is taught for dolphins (another word for Earth Elements) and for the

peaceniks. Remember the Viet Nam War was still going on and I was ex-military

(Army Security Agency).

 

There was NO psychic rapport between them and I.

 

Now I do LOVE some of Deepak's works.

 

(snipped)

 

Again, my problem with Vianna's stuff is NOT Vianna. It is the lack of proper

training methods on how-to-consciously build mind bridges between the different

aspects of mind.

 

Without that being build, only hallucinations are repeatable.

 

Hallucinations will NOT heal anyone.

 

(NOW this post is getting ON-TOPIC for this discussion group!!!)

 

About 10% of the population are 'naturally psychic' (Jose's testing came up with

those numbers) SOME OF THE TIME.

 

But because of no training, they cannot REPEAT what they accidentally do once in

a while.

 

This is the trap MOST healers fall into without the proper training.

 

You want at least 80% accuracy and NOT 10%.

 

And John Grinder also modeled healers (about 1985 and it's on audio), and John

noticed their were about 5% of the people that he could not heal even using the

modeling process.

 

Some people just have a certain 'attitude' that by-passes the healer's

processes, and it is a particular personality trait.

 

> I was looking through Tillman's websites and I didn't notice any >technology

that he was developing, but only that he was looking for >a parallel

understanding between the sciences and meta-sciences.

 

You are looking in the wrong place.

 

I'd get Dr. Tiller's three very complex books. You can find them on amazon.

 

And I really do believe that Dr. Tiller 'believes' he is simplying what he's

done so us 'non-physic' students can understand, but...

 

....I'd get a dictionary, and someone that actually knows science (physics) on an

intimate level to help explain what he has VERIFIED in his experimentation over

the past 35 years with dowsing, remote viewing, remote healing and his

'intention' experiments.

 

For me, I got my long time friend and student (21 years now) Dr. Walter Hurlbut

to assist me.

 

And Doc Walter does not agree with everything Dr. Tiller says...but there is

enough understanding between their education that I can learn better.

 

> ...I think his research shows promise. MIU researches have been

> proving their theories for decades and no one pays them any mind,

> so I hope that Tillman has better success.

 

It does.

 

He is.

 

Why?

 

I'm pretty sure one of the reasons is because he DOES NOT come from a religious

angle, (notice I did NOT say 'spiritual')...

 

John La Tourrette, PhD