Guest guest Posted October 18, 2003 Report Share Posted October 18, 2003 - <arnoldgore Subject:Alternative Medicine & Dietary Supplements and the Medical Establishment > Hi Health Activists & Consumers, > Many policymakers in government and businesses that are involved in the > payment for medical care put a great deal of reliance on the public positions taken > by the major mainstream medical associations. Since medical decisions are > deemed to have a technical, scientific basis that most people are not familiar > with,this seems reasonable. > But when does the medical association begin to let its own personal economic > interest in the current system and its accumulated " knowledge base " supersede > its medical/scientific judgment? Whenever someone has gone through extensive > educational training, there is a natural tendency to avoid or delay a > completely new body of knowledge that often challenges the older training that was > obtained over many years at considerable expense of time and money. When you > consider that the pharmaceutical industry is the largest contributor to the funding > of medical education and medical students and then doctors are assiduously > courted and " assisted " by drug company representatives who give out free > supplies from drug samples to free internet service, it is not surprising to see most > doctors accept the orthodox positions skepticism of alternative non > prescription drug therapies that challenge the big money making procedures of modern > allopathic medicine. In addition to the traditional American Medical > Association, Dr.Sidney Wolfe of the politically more liberal Health Research Group and > the medical advisors of Consumers Union have been unduly critical of the > established safety record of dietary supplements.As consumers we must try to become > familiar with these alternatives, such as dietary supplements and impress upon > political leadrers that you want to maintain your access to these nutrients. > There is a huge disinformation campaign being mounted against these dietary > supplements, usually under the pretext of " safety " by using their extraordinary > influence over the media that is often dependent upon the bountiful advertising > budgets of the drug industry. In the United States we are now faced with the > threat from the Supplement Safety Act. After our Tuesday meeting with > Sen.Schumer's office we will have to concentrate on Senator Clinton. > > In the meantime call Senator Schumer's NYC office 212-486-4430and ask him to > withdraw his co-sponsorship of the Supplement Safety Act. > Call Sen.Clinton's NYC office 212-688-6262 and ask that she meet with > Consumers Health Freedom Coalition on the Supplement safety Act. > Sen. Charles Schumer New York State offices: > Albany office 518-431-4070 > Buffalo " 716-846-4111 > Binghamton 607-772-6792 > Hudson Valley 914-285-9741 > Long Island 631-753-0978 > Rochester 585-263-5866 > Syracuse 315-423-5471 > > Washington,DC office 202-224-6542 > > E-mail: senator > > Sen. Hillary Clinton > New York City office tel. 212-688-6262 > Westchester 914-725-9294 > Long Island 631-249-2825 > Buffalo 716-854-9725 > Syracuse 315-448-0470 > Rochester 585-263-6250 > North Country 315-376-6118 > Washington,DC office 202-224-4451 > E-mail: senator > Sen. Diane Feinstein > San Francisco office 415-393-0707 > Los Angeles 310-914-7300 > San Diego 619-231-9712 > Fresno 559-485-7430 > Washington,DC 202-224-3841 > > > > If you don't live in New York, you can find your 2 senators, each state has 2 > at www.senate.gov Ask them to oppose the Supplement Safety Act S.722 and > support DSHEA Full Implementation and Enforcement Act S.1538 sponsored by Senator > Harkin (D-IA). > arnold > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 25, 2003 Report Share Posted November 25, 2003 Tue, 25 Nov 2003 16:20:43 -0900 Sandy Mintz FW: Alternative Medicine & Dietary Supplements and the Medical Establishment From Arnold Gore: Hi Health Activists & Consumers, Many policymakers in government and businesses that are involved in the payment for medical care put a great deal of reliance on the public positions taken by the major mainstream medical associations. Since medical decisions are deemed to have a technical, scientific basis that most people are not familiar with,this seems reasonable. But when does the medical association begin to let its own personal economic interest in the current system and its accumulated " knowledge base " supersede its medical/scientific judgment? Whenever someone has gone through extensive educational training, there is a natural tendency to avoid or delay a completely new body of knowledge that often challenges the older training that was obtained over many years at considerable expense of time and money. When you consider that the pharmaceutical industry is the largest contributor to the funding of medical education and medical students and then doctors are assiduously courted and " assisted " by drug company representatives who give out free supplies from drug samples to free internet service, it is not surprising to see most doctors accept the orthodox positions skepticism of alternative non prescription drug therapies that challenge the big money making procedures of modern allopathic medicine. In addition to the traditional American Medical Association, Dr.Sidney Wolfe of the politically more liberal Health Research Group and the medical advisors of Consumers Union have been unduly critical of the established safety record of dietary supplements.As consumers we must try to become familiar with these alternatives, such as dietary supplements and impress upon political leadrers that you want to maintain your access to these nutrients. There is a huge disinformation campaign being mounted against these dietary supplements, usually under the pretext of " safety " by using their extraordinary influence over the media that is often dependent upon the bountiful advertising budgets of the drug industry. In the United States we are now faced with the threat from the Supplement Safety Act. After our Tuesday meeting with Sen.Schumer's office we will have to concentrate on Senator Clinton. In the meantime call Senator Schumer's NYC office 212-486-4430and ask him to withdraw his co-sponsorship of the Supplement Safety Act. Call Sen.Clinton's NYC office 212-688-6262 and ask that she meet with Consumers Health Freedom Coalition on the Supplement safety Act. Sen. Charles Schumer New York State offices: Albany office 518-431-4070 Buffalo " 716-846-4111 Binghamton 607-772-6792 Hudson Valley 914-285-9741 Long Island 631-753-0978 Rochester 585-263-5866 Syracuse 315-423-5471 Washington,DC office 202-224-6542 E-mail: senator Sen. Hillary Clinton New York City office tel. 212-688-6262 Westchester 914-725-9294 Long Island 631-249-2825 Buffalo 716-854-9725 Syracuse 315-448-0470 Rochester 585-263-6250 North Country 315-376-6118 Washington,DC office 202-224-4451 E-mail: senator Sen. Diane Feinstein San Francisco office 415-393-0707 Los Angeles 310-914-7300 San Diego 619-231-9712 Fresno 559-485-7430 Washington,DC 202-224-3841 If you don't live in New York, you can find your 2 senators, each state has 2 at www.senate.gov Ask them to oppose the Supplement Safety Act S.722 and support DSHEA Full Implementation and Enforcement Act S.1538 sponsored by Senator Harkin (D-IA). arnold Sandy Mintz http://www.vaccinationnews.com/ http://www.vaccinationnews.com/Scandals/past_scandals.htm http://www.vaccinationnews.com/Out_of_Control/past_ool.htm SPONSOR OF SBS, VACCINES AND AUTISM ONLINE CONFERENCES AT http://www.redflagsdaily.com " Eternal vigilance is the price of liberty. " - Wendell Phillips (1811-1884), paraphrasing John Philpot Curran (1808) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.