A question of ethics in the application of RV/RI …

[Guest guest]

At 12:01 AM 6/29/2005, you wrote:

In a

message dated 6/28/05 5:14:06 PM, marangneng writes:

Jose Silva's admonition to use the

skills only for the benefit of

humanity really stuck with me. Now I'm trying to understand the

scope

of what is beneficial to humanity and what isn't.

Ah, there's the rub. It's an awesome responsibility to be RIGHT

about

what is in the best interest of all of HUMANITY. Thus, laws of

ALLOWING.

I'll be interested to see if we could come to some agreement as to

what

exactly we should do to influence who, what, where,

when?

Sue,

A couple of things to consider...

right is a low level distinction

right is a subjective distinction

if you sort by others you will hardly ever get what you want and you will

think that is right

If you sort by self you will get what you want and you will think that is

right

If you sort externally you will get one right

If you sort internally you will get another right

If you sort by others you will not include yourself in humanity

If you sort by self you will not even recognize others in the decision.

 

If you sort my simultaneous you will include both you and others in

humanity

If you sort by switch you will include others in humanity and you know

they will soon come around to your point of view.

One of the reasons the law of allowing has to be preached, taught and

remembered is because we put a lot of dependence on the mind (the

conscious part) without it being balanced and connected, (unihipili,

uhane, aumakua all equal and communicating with each other).

Rightness is in the domain of the uhane (conscious mind)-head brain,

following patterns-no recognition of right/wrong, is in the domain of the

unihipili (unconscious mind)-heart brain, inclusion and creation are in

the domain of the aumakua (High-self)-belly brain.

The concept of being right is what gives the conscious mind its'

domination. It compares everything to prove it's superiority.

Jose was a great man (he also had to make it palatable to the religious

people and particular the Catholic Church as much as he could) and yet

history shows examples of people using Psychic powers without the greater

good of humanity in mind.

In fact the father of modern PSI, Uncle Chuckie, comes to mind, has a

totally different view of what is good for humanity, but if we use the

NLP presupposition, " no one does anything that is not out of

positive self intention " we can see that at least one aspect of

humanity is helped or benefited every time you use your abilities...

 

And as to your question about what we should do to influence, may I

suggest do all you can then calibrate, readjust, act and repeat the

process, until you get your outcome...

To Your Best

Houston

Solve your problems by going deeper than the roots, solve them

at the core

http://www.achieve-your-potential.com/solving-problems.html