Guest guest Posted July 29, 2005 Report Share Posted July 29, 2005 , Helen Driscoll <helen@i...> wrote: > Doc Houston - > > You're right - the YES has to be stronger and more intentional >than the NO. Actually " I DISAGREE " totally. Here's why I disagree. Here's " what else " to do instead;-) I disagree BECAUSE your calibration method is very sloppy! Do a suds scale. A suds scale for what you decide to say " NO " to. Is it a 9? Then keeping on doing " NO " until it is a ZERO! Then when you are doing the " belief " installation, do a suds scale of the new " wanted " belief... Is it a 2? Then do the " YES " until it is at least an 8. Verify all suds scale readings with proper energy testing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.