Guest guest Posted August 2, 2005 Report Share Posted August 2, 2005 > Oh, Mr. Wilson! > You opened a traditional can of worms, here. > I still say that I'd stick with the " less-than-lethal, self-defene > training " that is recognized by the courts, and enroll yourself in >a state-approved > " police karate " course. Interesting, though I do disagree. And my disagreement is based upon many, many years of training cops, of training military, of training a few mercenaries and of training civilians. Here's why I disagree. NOT in not doing that, but in, " it's just NOT enough " . Here it is. Cops, Law Enforcement, blab, blab, blab, have DIFFERENT RULES for what they will teach others and what they learn themselves! Cops don't want non-cops to learn the lethal secrets, mainly because they fear two things. FEAR #1. Cops fear the legal repercussions " if " you use THEIR TRAININGS improperly, so in defense of their own asses, they don't train civilians in real skills. Cops don't want to get sued because one of their students misused the self-defense skills. FEAR #2. Cops fear that evil people might come to them for training, so they never teach civilians anything good enough to use against them, the cops. In fact the above fear is prevalent among traditional martial arts trainers also and has been ever since martial arts have existed;-) Anyway, any course that is police approved has most, if not all of the most effective technologies removed. Verified. Fact. Proven. Just ask any cop, or any cop trainer. For that matter, ask any hard- core criminal. The only ones that don't seem to know that are the civilians that have had no military training. > Otherwise, you'll get someone like on your jury who has only seen > movies, and you'll get yourself landed in jail because of > your " lethal techniques " . Sorry. Even the non-lethal-force trainings are under that stigma. You can be sued for clenching a fist!!! You can be sued for using a LOUD TONE OF VOICE!!! So, maybe it's more effective to learn what to do and say to cops AFTER you've saved you own butt in a lethal encounter. The good news is, most lethal encounters, i.e., like a genuine ambush with a gun happens in less than 1% of killings. The rest of the time, if you are taught proper calibration skills and don't get complacent, you really do have a 99% chance of controlling the situation IF you are training in proper strategies and tactics. So, " YES " knowing what to say after you'll survived the encounter is very important, but does NOT take precedence over surviving the encounter. Many of those tactics are in the book " Mental Training of a Warrior " ...Other of those tactics are in " Ninja Mind Warrior Mentality for Street Combat " ... ....and there are some CLASSIFIED POLICE BOOKS out there that do one hell of a good job of going over them. Books like " Street Survival Tactics for Armed Encounters " , and others of that life from Caliber Press. > Just stick with what's approved by the police council in your >state (ie. " come-along >techniques " , self-defense and evasion). Well, that is a possibility… ....but... Let's look at what Roy wants, if that is okay since that his original concern. >I recently became a Bail Recovery Agent and although I can carry a >weapon and no doubt there are times when a pistol is a good thing to >have, He is going out after CRIMINALS! People that have run from the cops AFTER BEING out on bail. These fellows are NOT huggy feely. And, him attempting to use a traditional approach (whatever one the Mr. Wilson <I think he's a teenage> is speaking about) will probably get him in deep caca. Traditional approaches, NONE of them, have what Roy needs and Roy wants. Now here's the real hairy part. Come-alongs DON'T WORK unless you know the 9 different types of nerve cavity strikes and the 4 methods of applying them. Come-alongs DON'T WORK unless you are much stronger than the perp (the old jiujutsu master's said, " be 2-1/2 times as strong as the civilian " ), and the perp is caught off-guard. Come-alongs DON'T WORK unless you lock the joint, and then gently move the joint or the vibrational point every 1-2 seconds so that the pain receptors keep on firing. Of course you can just lock and break the joint then move them by that BROKEN JOINT. Broken joints as a fulcrum of pain compliance works well. Unfortunately the opposing lawyer will then have you under charges for mayhem. >I would much rather deal with any up-close difficulties in a way >which is not so violent but just as effective in rendering a person >helpless so that I might take them into custody. Here I infer that Roy just doesn't want to shoot anyone, unless it's necessary. I do suggest Roy get proper training in when " it's okay to shoot the absconder " , and get the certification that shows he's had the training. Just some of the CYA that anyone in that field would be smart to go through. >There are so many styles out there that it is confusing to me to try >and find one which will give me the results I need. >I do not have time to take a long drawn out learning process since I >need to be able to apply some techniques in a short time from now. Massad Ayoob has some neat quickee courses that will help. So does Caliber Press. There are others, but I've been out of that field for a few years so I'm not up on the current " whiz boys " of the police combative arts. >I dont know if age or size matters as far being more compatible to a >certain style but I am 52 and 6'. It sure does! Size, strength, knowledge and attitude ALL really count. So does proper street wise training. The triangle of Police Survival is, 1)Mental/physical conditioning, 2)tactics and then, 3)shooting skill. Just be darn sure you learn those proper skills and the rules that society has that goes with them. Otherwise, when you get in a situation, AND YOU WILL... ....you don't want your lack of confidence in your abilities to conduct yourself properly in risky situations to become panic born of desperation. I've clients that get in 3-11 tussles an evening...and they do it lawfully without violating the perps rights. You can learn to do the same. >I dont wish to necessarily hurt anyone, but at the same time I want >it over quickly and with as little trouble as possible. Well Roy, you'd better rethink this through. Because, if you don't IN ADVANCE work out what you need to do, then, when you need to do it you won't be able to do anything. A basic law of cognition for combat. The harder you prepare BEFORE COMBAT, the MORE YOU SWEAT BEFORE THE FIGHT, the easier the real street situation then becomes. Then a street situation just becomes " old hat " ...nothing to it. Ps. If I can help on anything, let me know. > Later, > S. --- , federalprisoncop@w... wrote: > Oh, Mr. Wilson! > > You opened a traditional can of worms, here. > > I still say that I'd stick with the " less-than-lethal, self- defene > training " that is recognized by the courts, and enroll yourself in a > state-approved " police karate " course. > > Otherwise, you'll get someone like on your jury who has only seen > movies, and you'll get yourself landed in jail because of your " lethal techniques " . > > Just stick with what's approved by the police council in your state > (ie. " come-along techniques " , self-defense and evasion). > > Later, > S. > - ----------- > - > > In a message dated 8/1/2005 4:59:50 AM Eastern Daylight Time, > docspeed2001 writes: > > > > --- , james wilson <johntwo8> wrote: > > > Hello and how r u? the best thing is traditional karate. the very > > >basics. these simple princepals will take u a far as u will ever > > >need. > > > > Really? > > > > Maybe you can help me out a bit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.