Ways to stack 'shit' so they still like you...

[Guest guest]

I saw combination of 'away from' propulsion -- 'getting worse and worse'.. and

embedded command -- telling him to massage with peanut oil.

 

When you went ahead and talked about his 308 sniper rifle after reminding him to

try peanut oil massage, it made him associated peanut oil massage AND something

he likes and feels proud of.

 

Most importantly, you respected his model of the world. When he massages with

peanut oil, he'll consider it as his own decision.

 

Wilson

 

 

 

, " docspeed2001 "

<docspeed2001 wrote:

>

>

> , " docspeed2001 "

<docspeed2001@> wrote:

> > Today I saw him and he was still griping about the pain.

> >

> > I asked him if he'd done the peanut oil.

> >

> > " Nope " .

> >

> > " Okay " , I told him, " Don't do it. Just keep on having it get worse and

worse. Or you can take 10 minutes, massage peanut oil into it, and see what is

and what is not. Your choice. "

> >

> > Then I switched topic to his neat 308 sniper rifle.

>

> Just curious,

>

> Who else besides Walter and Jimmy recognized the above language pattern, and

the PURPOSE of me using it?

>

> Please explan in detail.

>

> Has anyone yet noticed that virtually all my posts have stacked

presuppositions?

>

> Tell me about it.

>

> Dr John La Tourrette

>

[Guest guest]

Okay Doc,

 

I'll bite.

 

My guess is that when you told him, " Don't do it. Just let it get worse and

worse...... " you were handling this man's tendency to be a polarity responder,

and stacked that.

 

Then " you switched to the topic of his NEAT sniper rifle " cos you wanted to

exaggerate the contrast between something he found distasteful (pain) and

something he really enjoyed. You elicted the positive anchor in such a way that

he would have alot of room to swing over from the negative to the

positive....perhaps creating room for him to see the LACK of pain as something

to be enjoyed, as well.

 

Yes, always open loops with your posts...people often appreciate and learn far

more when they arrive at conclusions on their own.

 

Yes?

Or no?

 

Melissa

 

, " docspeed2001 "

<docspeed2001 wrote:

>

>

> , " docspeed2001 "

<docspeed2001@> wrote:

> > Today I saw him and he was still griping about the pain.

> >

> > I asked him if he'd done the peanut oil.

> >

> > " Nope " .

> >

> > " Okay " , I told him, " Don't do it. Just keep on having it get worse and

worse. Or you can take 10 minutes, massage peanut oil into it, and see what is

and what is not. Your choice. "

> >

> > Then I switched topic to his neat 308 sniper rifle.

>

> Just curious,

>

> Who else besides Walter and Jimmy recognized the above language pattern, and

the PURPOSE of me using it?

>

> Please explan in detail.

>

> Has anyone yet noticed that virtually all my posts have stacked

presuppositions?

>

> Tell me about it.

>

> Dr John La Tourrette

>

[Guest guest]

And, I realized I didn't completely answer your question in my last response.

 

Your stacked presuppositions: You are pre-supposing that we are here to learn,

and are following up by acting as if we are. This is what comes across loud and

clear - all the way through - in your posts, and accompanying suggestions, how

to's, tag-end questions, isn't that right?

 

The learning is in the DO-ing.

 

Melissa

 

, " docspeed2001 "

<docspeed2001 wrote:

>

>

> , " docspeed2001 "

<docspeed2001@> wrote:

> > Today I saw him and he was still griping about the pain.

> >

> > I asked him if he'd done the peanut oil.

> >

> > " Nope " .

> >

> > " Okay " , I told him, " Don't do it. Just keep on having it get worse and

worse. Or you can take 10 minutes, massage peanut oil into it, and see what is

and what is not. Your choice. "

> >

> > Then I switched topic to his neat 308 sniper rifle.

>

> Just curious,

>

> Who else besides Walter and Jimmy recognized the above language pattern, and

the PURPOSE of me using it?

>

> Please explan in detail.

>

> Has anyone yet noticed that virtually all my posts have stacked

presuppositions?

>

> Tell me about it.

>

> Dr John La Tourrette

>