this is NOT making lemonade out of lemons

[Guest guest]

kgould wrote:

>

> Hi Doc,

> In my own experience I apply the principle that there is nothing

> outside of us that is not also inside of us,

 

Hi Karen,

 

I agree with you on one level...

 

....and I think there is more to it on another level.

 

Let me explain the differences I see/feel.

 

That statement is a reframe.

 

It's the old 'perception is projection', which does have a place, but is NOT

really useful in the context I mentioned.

 

By 'useful' I mean something that can be used in a practical and verifiable way.

 

And it does NOT address the negative feelings in a way to stop them from

stopping your behavior from acting in the way that it does.

 

It also does NOT install a more positive productive behavior in yourself when

reading that book.

 

For example, Dale Carnegie's book, " How to Win Friends & Influence People " used

to be repulsive to me. Like a 'slick willy' feeling. And my take on that was

" people use this book to influence others in ways for their own self-gain " .

 

Which, from your point of view means that I had envy in my heart for that book

because a part of me was 'slick willy'. (more down the page)

 

>so integrating that shadow aspect, with energy therapies, within >ourselves can

alleviate our aggravation at seeing it reflected in >the manifest world.

 

So by keeping that frame of " if I did use the tactics out of HTWF & IP I'd feel

like I was a slick willy and that would be repulsive for me and an away-from. "

 

Anything that triggers us in an away-from manner OUT-OF-HABIT is a

non-productive thought field (habit) and is probably NOT effective for us in

learning positive information from the 2 EXAMPLES GIVEN; Donna's book and Dale's

book.

 

So by finding the repulsor, and erasing it, and knowing in advance that erasing

it is safe (one of the 4 classifications of Psychological Reversal), then you

can install another and better habit field about that context (Donna's and

Dale's book) and get the massive positive benefits from them.

 

So it's a unique and unknown form of Self-Manifestation!

 

Usually that new habit field does have a context, and does have a linguistic

component to target the behavior wanted instead.

 

Something like, " If there was a way I could enjoy learning the tactics out of

this book, how would I? "

 

I just read a book by Judith O., which is repugnant beyond repugnance to me.

 

But a friend (Fred Gallo) recommended it and I do admire and respect Fred.

 

So with my value system I could read it and feel like poop...

 

....Or I could change my frame on the positive possibilities and read it and take

massive amounts of notes on how to fix what she wrote so that Woods, Metals, and

Fires could learn from it.

 

So with that book that disgusts me I used, " Even if I think this book is for

brainless idiots, I choose to find massive importance from it that I can use

now! "

 

And I did.

 

Please notice that I am NOT bad-mouthing anyone's book, but aligning my Easy

Energy Method with the thought-forms of my own subconscious mind so that the

advanced and unique method works very well.

 

Does any of this make sense Group?

 

And PLEASE, do not state something like " making lemonade out of lemons " . Ugh.

 

Thank you Karen.

 

John La Tourrette, PhD

 

 

> >>Beth,

> >>I personally like the book Energy Medicine itself.

> >

> > Hi Mary,

> >

> > There is a funny thing about the " Energy Medicine for Women " book.

> >

> > I hated it...

> >

> > ...so I went though it page by page to find out why I hated it.

> >

> > I finally noticed that there are photographs of an 'ego maniac bitch'

> > inside the book so that every time I picked up the book and saw her

> > photograph, those negative anchors I have about her (It's NOT Donna) came

> > to the fore and I would stop studying that book.

> >

> > My simple solution, " blow-out " those negative perturbations about that

> > woman in those photographs...and then study the book.

> >

> > Now group, how else can you effectively use the VERY IMPORTANT INFORMATION

> > in this post?

> >

> > Especially in the realm of self-healing?

> >

> > John La Tourrette, PhD