You need MORE than tapping to fix bruxism!

[Guest guest]

> > Bruxism

 

> I don't think presuppositions NECESSARILY show up, but they often

>do, if you look at what people say. Let's see:

> If one were to have a " problem, " and were to begin to " tap on it, "

>and then something " comes up, " the response is to assume a

>correlation. Does that mean that the correlation exists?

 

No, but...( a phrase that negates what went before the 'but')...

 

It is a cause and effect problem.

 

> something works, right? I had one NLP practitioner tell me that I

> would do just as well to learn how to juggle. Who knows, maybe HE'S

> right! I haven't tested it to see if he is or not.

 

I'm curious to 'what caused you to give the above example? " Ego?

 

Especially since you said " maybe he's right " ...which you prefaced

with " I'm not saying that EFT doesn't work...blab, blab, blab... "

 

Your NLP phraseology actually does mean something and it's pretty

clear to what you do mean.

 

Your given words state " EFT doesn't work " ...and that " The NLP

practitioner is right in his (uninformed) assumptions " .

 

And I'm curious to why you used a practitioner from A DIFFERENT

discipline to explain what what you did with EFT did not work for you?

 

It's like using the logic of a pig farmer to explain how to put

chocolate layering on a cake.

 

They are incongruent with each other.

 

To me it appears to be your way of saving face, where it's " not you "

but the " process of EFT that didn't work " .

 

> Well, EFT didn't work for me...

 

(and other negative blab, blab, blabs deleted)

 

I'm not too much in to arguing with this and with that...but I can

tell you what to do for your Bruxism.

 

And part of the 'fix' would be appropiate Energy Psychology. Part of

it would be NLP. Part of it would be Energy Medicine. Part of it

would be 'other stuff'.

 

John La Tourrette, PhD

[Guest guest]

healingenergies-

essentialskills , " docspeed2001 " <docspeed2001

wrote:

>

> > > Bruxism

>

> > I don't think presuppositions NECESSARILY show up, but they often

> >do, if you look at what people say. Let's see:

> > If one were to have a " problem, " and were to begin to " tap on it, "

> >and then something " comes up, " the response is to assume a

> >correlation. Does that mean that the correlation exists?

>

> No, but...( a phrase that negates what went before the 'but')...

>

> It is a cause and effect problem.

>

> > something works, right? I had one NLP practitioner tell me that I

> > would do just as well to learn how to juggle. Who knows, maybe

HE'S

> > right! I haven't tested it to see if he is or not.

>

> I'm curious to 'what caused you to give the above example? " Ego?

>

> Especially since you said " maybe he's right " ...which you prefaced

> with " I'm not saying that EFT doesn't work...blab, blab, blab... "

>

> Your NLP phraseology actually does mean something and it's pretty

> clear to what you do mean.

>

> Your given words state " EFT doesn't work " ...and that " The NLP

> practitioner is right in his (uninformed) assumptions " .

>

> And I'm curious to why you used a practitioner from A DIFFERENT

> discipline to explain what what you did with EFT did not work for

you?

>

> It's like using the logic of a pig farmer to explain how to put

> chocolate layering on a cake.

>

> They are incongruent with each other.

>

> To me it appears to be your way of saving face, where it's " not you "

> but the " process of EFT that didn't work " .

>

> > Well, EFT didn't work for me...

>

> (and other negative blab, blab, blabs deleted)

>

> I'm not too much in to arguing with this and with that...but I can

> tell you what to do for your Bruxism.

>

> And part of the 'fix' would be appropiate Energy Psychology. Part of

> it would be NLP. Part of it would be Energy Medicine. Part of it

> would be 'other stuff'.

>

> John La Tourrette, PhD

 

Doc,

 

Isn't this Bruxism a stress spin-off and once the stress is removed

and the bodies triple warmer/hypnothalamus reaction taught a

different reaction, then gone?

 

 

William