A Fart in the Wind Lacks Chi, or REMOTE VIEWING ATTITUDES!

[Guest guest]

> Ok, that's Mr. X's opinion,

>but mine is a little different.

>I like your style of speaking/

>teaching. As with some, on occasions

>it makes me squirm

> a little--but it's at exactly

>those moments that I'm inclined

>(forced?) to look into the topic

>(whatever it is) a little deeper,

>to look also within myself.

 

A Fart in the Wind Lacks Chi, or REMOTE VIEWING ATTITUDES!

 

Thank you Jeanne,

 

The original post from Mr. X stated that I'd called that person

names.

 

So, for you that know how to read, I've reposted that exact post to

this list.

 

Now read it and see if there is any name calling, or not!

 

> >Well gosh Mr. X. She has another 7 days. No reason for her to

> >hurry any decision is there? I mean, that WOODN'T be impolite to

> >the rest of us, wood it?

 

Well group, any name calling in the above?

 

Well gosh, NO name calling, BUT there is some pointing at BEHAVIORS

that are very NON-PRODUCTIVE.

 

There was a hypnotic COMMAND or two, was there not?

 

There was an phonological ambuity was there not? (Do NOT model my

spelling!)

 

And, there was some of my 'cute' humor.

 

What more can you ask?

 

> >It doesn't matter. I've offered 3 times and have still not got a

> >response. And many others have offered and NOT got a public

> >response, even though she stated " it should be kept public " .

 

Notice that the person neglected to respond to my emails, two of

them private, and one of them public.

 

Is that polite?

 

And, group, why not mind-read the reason for HER not responding.

 

If you don't know how, here's the details...

 

....go to level...

....go to theta...

....go with the intention of communicating with her...

....count from 1-2-3, and put on her head, both objectively and

subjectively, as you give yourself again the " intention " ...

....just repeat outloud what you " pick-up " with your TRAINED AND

HIGHLY HONED INTUITION, into a tape recorder.

....come back up from that level of mind...

....transcribe the tape...

....now read and analize AT BETA using BOTH BRAIN HEMISPHERES, the

information on the tape.

 

Gosh!

 

What did you notice?

 

She also did NOT respond to anyone else until AFTER the above post.

 

Was there ANY RESPECT from her towards anyone on her group?

 

Nada. Ziltch. Nothing. Zero. A fart in the wind.

 

Again, group, was their any name calling?

 

> >I don't really care any more...And have made my own plans and have

> >already carried them out.

 

Oh?

 

Did I just cut those aka connections that used to tie me to that

group?

 

Was that cutting done in exactly the manner that the " other "

requested, publicly?

 

Did I formulate my own plans and directions?

 

Were they does with ethics and values?

 

Have those plans been initiated in a manner that is productive for

me, pulling me in the direction that I've CHOSEN to go in?

 

So, group...

 

What is this last group about?

 

And, was there any name calling?

 

Please dissect, analize and contribute.

 

And, don't HAVE FUN doing it!

 

Because we WOODN'T want you to LEARN HOW TO THINK, wood we?

 

 

Ps. Did you NOTICE my SENSE OF HUMOR?

Just curious.

Did you NOTICE the PROACTIVE BEHAVIOR, versus the " avoidance "

behavior of the one I'm responding to?

 

> The first time I encountered a " Do the damn drills " post, I

>blanched, but then it was honesty time--was I doing them? (well,

>yes, er...sometimes) Was I doing them as often as I

> should? (nope) Result? Since reading maybe the third one of

>those DTDD posts, it's been a long while since I skipped one of the

>EM drills! They only work when you actually do them,

>apparently.

 

> Sometimes a good teacher doesn't tell us what we WANT to hear, but

>what we NEED to hear. They might not say it the way we'd like to

>hear it either, but in a way that cuts through the fluff we

>sometimes use for brains. In other words, Doc gets through where

>others might not.

 

> But of course Mr. X's " mileage might vary " as they say.

>Jeanne