Guest guest Posted December 29, 2008 Report Share Posted December 29, 2008 Obama's `Secretary of Food' December 12, 2008 by Daniel Redwood, DC Nicholas Kristof's column points out the problems with the Agriculture Department, which sends taxpayer dollars to all the wrong places and harms Americans' health when it should be helping. One measure of the absurdity of the system: Every year you, the American taxpayer, send me a check for $588 in exchange for me not growing crops on timberland I own in Oregon (I forward the money to a charity). That's right. The Agriculture Department pays a New York journalist not to grow crops in a forest in Oregon. Modern confinement operations are less like farms than like meat assembly lines. They are dazzlingly efficient in some ways, but they use vast amounts of grain, as well as low-level antibiotics to reduce infections — and the result is a public health threat from antibiotic- resistant infections. An industrial farm with 5,000 hogs produces as much waste as a town with 20,000 people. But while the town is required to have a sewage system, the industrial farm isn't. " They look profitable because we're paying for their wastes, " notes Robert P. Martin, executive director of the Pew Commission on Industrial Farm Animal Production. " And then there's the cost of antibiotic resistance to the economy as a whole. " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.