Guest guest Posted December 31, 2005 Report Share Posted December 31, 2005 Hi Doc. I have to admit I got Daily Digest Mails until I changed the accounts shortly and before that I never took the time to read through all of them. Just sporadically. I sure missed a lot! I learned so much just by watching how different people approach the ad. I think each one of it so far showed me something interesting. (WHATEVER the post was like) (As I will be leaving for a little New Year's Eve Trip in a few hours I have no time to comment the 3rd version or explicitly WHAT I have learned from the other posts [it's a lot about MY way of perceiving, what I didn't get, what seemed absolute unimportant for ME] although I would really like to. It's fun and I am learning a lot.) Anyway. I have one really important question. Maybe you realized by reading my comments to the ads that I'm everything else but a " visual " . I don't care about layout AT ALL. I don't care about single words that just don't " fit " because they are too nice or whatever (= " tonal " ?). (Well, I DID notice that very clearly by reading the other posts) For me it's about what I FEEL when I read it (as a whole. the underlines for example bring up a slight feeling of " aggression " ). And about the content! That's my " problem " . From what I have heard so far " Digitals " and " Kinesthetics " are more like opposites. (do you work with " Digitals " ? Until shortly I only knew the other three. Couldn't a digital be more a problem of our time... a... [to use that old, simple analogy] strong left-brain-focus that kind of overrides the " normal " type? Just a thought that came to my mind about two hours ago.) I'm both. Extremely rational but somehow more a kinesthetic. (When I look back I often acted like a digital. But I've been working at using both, logic and feeling, harmonising my left and right hemisphere and now I realised that I perceive and process like a kinesthetic... it's kind of a fight but I'm still looking for a symbiosis.) Somehow... that sucks. Try to varify vast " feelings " .... If I ever try something like Remote Viewing or Telepathy... Nothing. No pictures. No words. Different feelings MAYBE but what to do with THAT? I don't want to say there are no pictures in my head, when I construct them (may it be trying to manifest [ok, forget that! may it be manifesting] or remembering something which both are not so different in the way they are constructed) they are there and I'm getting better and better at that. I have an idea of what " thoughts " have to be like if I'd like them to be received (and followed if it's something like a " TURNAROUND " command+picture+movement). But as soon as I stop constructing there's NOTHING. My question: Is it a block? Should I try to begin my work from that kinesthetic frame...?? What are things that are easily verified for a sceptic? No. That one: CAN YOUR RV/RI COURSE HELP ME with that? If it REALLY can, I'll buy it. But I don't want to spend any more money on hearing the same words over and over again. I need someone competent, no platitudes. [i already see hordes of people angrily shouting at me because I dared to question Doc Hey, no offense intended. I'm just seeking help for a problem that is REALLY bothering me. I've already spent too much money on stuff that couldn't help me. I know that the introductory text says I NEED it. But I'm a damn sceptic. And maybe I (as a kinesthetic?) am just not fit for remote viewing. Forgive me ] Thanks. Michael PS: Something amusing: Ever played table football? Know what freaks are out there? On Sunday I played at a small tournament with my brother. I play 3 times a year and I was afraid I would have NO chance at that tournament. I had just jumped in for my other brother. As I didn't have the time to do that properly I used the 5 minutes while driving there to put my fingers in my relax- and alpha-or-whatever-anchors-positions and tell myself that I'd be as good as someone with my practice could possibly be. That my reflexes would compare to all the other skills. (When you're defending all you need is a good view, moving both sticks in the best possible way to cover as much as possible and crazy REFLEXES to be able to compete with the nerds.) By the way... naturally I'm... slow. Good reflexes are definitely NO natural strength of mine. Just wanted to mention that The Tournament went (seen from a realistic perspective) REALLY good for me. We kicked the first opponents from the table (watching them playing before the tournament started I almost got frightened by them...). And against the other two REALLY good teams we played about 3-5 times as long as all the games around us went. We weren't good enough to shoot goals (my brother is usually much better than me but in this games he was lost in front) but I was driving them crazy. That was SO FUNNY. A guy that looked sooooooooooo relaxed all day, because at least 4 out of 5 from his shots were goals (no matter against whom he played), got really ANGRY when he shot my player for the 7th or 8th time in a row. I'm thinking about starting table tennis again just to show what you can reach with the right mental training. Or I'll get into table soccer (there is no martial arts school here that I am interested in) Err.... anyway. I'm no " newbie " to psychic stuff, self-hypnosis etc etc (compared to a lot of people here, I AM, ok). I'm just pissed by not being able to " receive " . If there's for example (!) a board that is supposed to tell me the level of my relaxation I think... I wonder what that might be... let's say a 4... wait. let's say? aa, there it is, the 4. Yeah, but you made that up, it didn't appear by itself. BLABLABLA ....can you help me with that?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 31, 2005 Report Share Posted December 31, 2005 - " psychaelic " <psychael Can Doc's course help me? > I learned so much just by watching how different people approach the > ad. I think each one of it so far showed me something interesting. > (WHATEVER the post was like) > [it's a lot about MY way of perceiving, > what I didn't get, what seemed absolute unimportant for ME] although I > would really like to. It's fun and I am learning a lot.) That's the point of the exercise. It is interesting to see what is important to other people who read the ads. > Maybe you realized by reading my comments to the ads that I'm > everything else but a " visual " . I don't care about layout AT ALL. I > don't care about single words that just don't " fit " because they are > too nice or whatever (= " tonal " ?). > (Well, I DID notice that very clearly by reading the other posts) > > For me it's about what I FEEL when I read it (as a whole. the > underlines for example bring up a slight feeling of " aggression " ). > And about the content! I am primarily a kinesthetic, and yet the visual layout is important to me. Some people have told me I'm an auditory, but that doesn't sound right. We all have access to all the representational systems. It is just a matter of which is dominant. Just as a person may be right hand, or left hand dominant. They can still use the other hand. A person may be right brain, or left brain dominant. They can still use the other half. Throughout a person's development, the right hand, the left brain, the kinesthetic, become dominant through repeated use. (This is just an example.) Just as a person can develop better coordination of the left hand with practice, a person can make better use of the right brain with practice. The same is true of a primarily kinesthetic person who can get better visuals, WITH PRACTICE. You can develop whole-brain thinking. You can become ambidextrous. You can develop all of you representational systems. > CAN YOUR RV/RI COURSE HELP ME with that? > > If it REALLY can, I'll buy it. But I don't want to spend any more > money on hearing the same words over and over again. I need someone > competent, no platitudes. > [i already see hordes of people angrily shouting at me because I dared > to question Doc Questions asked respectfully are usually answered respectfully. I have listened to many different programs over the years, and I can tell you that this program is unique. Let's see, how does that go? If you do the drills, you will get the skills. Yes, I think it's something like that. The RV/RI course communicates with both sides of your brain. Logical info for the left, and imagination for the right. There is plenty of information for your conscious mind, as well as exercises for your unconscious mind. The key is to learn to use your whole brain. > Hey, no offense intended. I'm just seeking help for a problem that is > REALLY bothering me. I've already spent too much money on stuff that > couldn't help me. I know that the introductory text says I NEED it. > But I'm a damn sceptic. And maybe I (as a kinesthetic?) am just not > fit for remote viewing. > Forgive me ] HOGWASH. Anyone can develop remote viewing skills. It just takes some of us a little longer. I used to be very jealous of the visual people I would guide through meditations. My wife is a highly visual person. When we talked about her experiences afterward, her descriptions were so detailed that I thought it must have been like walking into a Disney animation for her. I so WANTED that kind of experience. I learned that you don't get it from trying. You get it from doing. By the way, why did I think her experience was like a Disney animation? I couldn't see what she was seeing. Maybe because I've had those kinds of visuals before. Maybe I could learn how to access that again. There are specific drills on the RV/RI course that helped me improve my visuals. Ultimately the decision is yours. Rick > Thanks. > > Michael Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.