One possibility of why US is in Iraq

[Guest guest]

To test weapons: Here is a story new to Rense.

Truth?

 

Ed

 

 

 

 

Rense.com

 

 

 

 

 

 

Horrifying

US Secret

Weapon Unleashed In Baghdad

Exclusive By Bill

Dash

c. 2003

8-25-03

 

 

 

 

 

 

A nightmarish US super weapon reportedly was employed by American

ground forces during chaotic street fighting in Baghdad. The secret tank-mounted weapon was witnessed in

all its frightening power by Majid al-Ghazali, a seasoned Iraqi infantryman

who described the device and its gruesome effects as unlike anything he had

ever encountered in his lengthy military service. The disturbing revelation

is yet another piece of cinematic evidence brought back from postwar Iraq by intrepid filmmaker Patrick Dillon.

 

In the film, al-Ghazali, whose english is less than

fluent, describes the weapon as reminiscent of a flame thrower, only immensely

more powerful. It is unclear what principle the weapon is based on. Searching

for a description, al-Ghazali said it appeared to be shooting concentrated

lightning bolts rather than just ordinary flames. Drawing on his many years

as a professional engineer, al-Ghazali speculates that radiation of some kind

probably figures into the weapon's hideous capabilities. Like all men in

Saddam's Iraq, al-Ghazali was compelled to serve in the Iraqi equivalent of

the Army National Guard and fought in three wars over the past thirty-odd

years. Via email, he told me he has seen virtually every type of conventional

weapon employed in battle, and is well acquainted with their effects on

people and machines, but nothing in his extensive combat experience prepared him

for the shock of what he saw in Baghdad on April 12th.

On that date, al-Ghazali and his family sheltered in

their house as a fierce street battle erupted in his neighborhood. In the

midst of the fighting, he noticed that the Americans had called up an oddly

configured tank. Then to his amazement the tank suddenly let loose a blinding

stream of what seemed like fire and lightning, engulfing a large passenger

bus and three automobiles. Within seconds the bus had become semi-molten,

sagging " like a wet rag " as he put it. He said the bus rapidly

melted under this withering blast, shrinking until it was a twisted blob

about the dimensions of a VW bug. As if that were not bizarre enough, al-Ghazali

explicitly describes seeing numerous human bodies shriveled to the size of

newborn babies. By the time local street fighting ended that day, he

estimates between 500 and 600 soldiers and civilians had been cooked alive as

a result of the mysterious tank-mounted device.

In a city littered everywhere with burned-out

civilian and military vehicles, US forces were abnormally scrupulous about

immediately detailing bulldozers and shovel crews to the job of burying the

grim wreckage. Nevertheless, telltale remnants remained as Dillon found when

al-Ghazali later took him to the site. Dillon said they easily uncovered

large puddles of resolidified metal and mounds of weird fibrous material

that, al-Ghazali explained, were all that remained of the vehicles' tires.

Dillon, who accumulated plenty of battlefield experience as a medic in

Viet-Nam, and has since covered a number of wars from Somalia to Kosovo, told me that he has witnessed every kind

of conventional ordnance that can be used on humans and vehicles. " I've

seen a freaking smorgasbord of destruction in my life, " he said,

" flame-throwers, napalm, white phosphorous, thermite, you name it. I

know of nothing short of an H-bomb that conceivably might cause a bus to

instantly liquefy or that can flash broil a human body down to the size of an

infant. God pity humanity if that thing is a preview of what's in store for

the 21st century. "

For Majid al-Ghazali, images of the terrifying

weapon and its victims haunt his every day. In addition to his work as an

engineer, he is also a highly accomplished classical violinist, occupying the

first chair in the Baghdad Symphony. He is widely acknowledged as one of the

preeminent violinists in the Middle East. Besides his family, one of his greatest joys is

teaching at Baghdad's premier music conservatory.

Unfortunately, the conservatory was utterly destroyed. Yet somehow, despite

the war's horrors and its seemingly endless privations, he manages to

maintain a remarkably hopeful outlook. He recently informed me that the

Baghdad Symphony continues to exist and has been invited to perform in the United States in December.

Copyright ©2003 - Bill Dash

See also associated article by Bill Dash...

 

Iraqi Commander Swears

He Saw US Evacuate Saddam

 

 

 

 

 

 

Disclaimer

 

Email This Article

 

 

 

 

 

MainPage

http://www.rense.com

 

 

 

[Guest guest]

And what would you say to this news that appeared in the London's The Guardian: the present US government and the Pakistani military (self-appointed) President Musharraf have entered a contract NOT to capture or kill Osama bin Laden who is hiding in the north west part of Pakistan? The lever used by Musharraf was the argument that if bin Laden were caught or killed in Pakistan, then there would be uprising within Pakistan that even the military government of Pakistan would not be able to stop. The implicit threat therein is that in that scenario the nuclear bomb of Pakistan will be stolen by the terrorists.

It is terrifying to note the number of Frankesteins or potential Herr Reich the US has created around the world.

Ratan.

 

-

Ed Siceloff

Tuesday, August 26, 2003 2:32 AM

One possibility of why US is in Iraq

 

 

To test weapons: Here is a story new to Rense. Truth?

 

Ed

 

 

[Guest guest]

Absolutely Ratan:

 

  One is left saying “If only this, or if

only that.â€

 

  The design of the federal government by

the constitution of the United States

into a constitutional republic was intended to enable a certain amount of

centralized government and no more than what had been intended.  And that was

intended to make businesses (whose interests were represented in the

Continental Congress and the Constitutional Convention, of the confederated

states within the union to be able to conduct international business in a world

that was saw one of the purposes of government being to control and reap the

profits of business.  The first form of government after the successful

revolution protected individual rights to such an extent that it couldn’t

effectively operate what some of them saw as the purpose of government as

well---one thing of which was to enable business interests to operate internationally—treaties. 

And to borrow money and resell it—banking.  And to regulate different things

that would occur between the various states.  In order to do that effectively,

they needed to be able to tax. 

  But all was limited in scope by the

Constitution.  Said Constitution is only paid lip service today.  The people of

the US are actually ruled by an

unconstitutional “Patriot Act†which effectively does away with most of the

protection of individual rights for the sake of so=called “protection and

security.â€Â Â Â  But in getting from there to here, the United States has pursued a course, specifically for

its own empowerment and the empowerment and profits of its business interests,

that has set up dictators here, there, and everywhere.  The vestment of the

individual with rights over against government would stop all of that.  It

would preclude the US government from meddling in the affairs

of other nations.  It does so with the same rationale as it takes rights away

from people here.  Let us protect you, or our interests (business and not

individual rights) are at risk.  There is always a rationale.  But it is like a

little boy who is always getting into fights and all the time is telling people

that he never does anything to cause them.  Fight, fight, fight  but it is not

my responsibility. 

  It was never the purpose of the US to kill ben Laden.  Both Bush administrations have been

intricately tied up to him through familial interests, both on the American

side and the Saudi Arabian side, and now apparently with Pakistani interests as

well.  But both families have benefited through the policies of the US government with the Saudi Arabian government.  Both governments

have interests that seek profits, and power, generated by the businesses

controlled by the ben Laden family, and the Bush family. 

  One of the purposes of the US constitution was to secure the rights that were inherent

to people merely by virtue of the fact that they were people.  There was recognition

that they were born with those rights, and that would assume that all people,

everywhere were born with those rights.  Those rights existed over against the

government and its purpose was merely to secure them, again.  But the US government, today, is intent only on securing the rights

of a certain elite status of individuals who would rule the world.  And to do

it by hook or by crook, violence or monetary and trade manipulations, etc.etc.

  But anyways, that’s what I say. 

  Sorry to those who don’t like political orations. 

But the same reasons I am saying this are exactly the same reasons that exist

behind the Department of Agriculture,; the Food and Drug Administration, and

any other department that any say over what we individual people decide to

either eat as food, or to treat ourselves with as medicine.  We have the

inherent right as individuals to decide these things for ourselves according to

the various amounts of information we have at the time.  We don’t need any

other individual to be telling us, and restricting us, from what we would do

for ourselves.

 

Ed

 

 

DR. Ratan Singh

[ratans]

Tuesday, August 26, 2003

9:45 AM

To:

 

Re:

One possibility of why US is in Iraq

 

 

And what would you say to this news

that appeared in the London's The Guardian: the present US government and the

Pakistani military (self-appointed) President Musharraf have entered a contract

NOT to capture or kill Osama bin Laden who is hiding in the north west

part of Pakistan? The lever used by Musharraf was the argument that if bin

Laden were caught or killed in Pakistan, then there would be uprising within

Pakistan that even the military government of Pakistan would not be able to

stop. The implicit threat therein is that in that scenario the nuclear bomb of

Pakistan will be stolen by the terrorists.

 

 

It is terrifying to note the number

of Frankesteins or potential Herr Reich the US has created around the world.

 

 

Ratan.

 

 

 

-

 

 

Ed Siceloff

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tuesday,

August 26, 2003 2:32 AM

 

 

Subject:

One possibility of why US is in Iraq

 

 

 

 

To test

weapons: Here is a story new to Rense. Truth?

 

Ed

 

 

 

 

 

 

«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»

 

NATIONWIDE DENTAL BENEFITS PACKAGE PLUS

SAVE UP TO 80% on DENTAL, PRESCRIPTIONS DRUGS,

GLASSES, CONTACTS, VISION CARE, &

CHIROPRACTIC.

$11.95 For Single or

$19.95 For an entire household per month!

Immediate Coverage * No Waiting

Period

Pre-existing Covered * No Limit on Benefits

 

http://www.mybenefitsplus.com/MMerrill/

 

 

Email: MEM121

 

«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»

 

§ - PULSE ON WORLD HEALTH

CONSPIRACIES! §

 

Subscribe:.........

-

To :....

-

 

Any information here in is for educational purpose

only, it may be news related, purely speculation or someone's opinion. Always

consult with a qualified health practitioner before deciding on any course of

treatment, especially for serious or life-threatening illnesses.

**COPYRIGHT NOTICE**

In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107,

any copyrighted work in this message is

distributed under fair use without profit or payment to those who have

expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for non-profit

research and educational purposes only. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

 

 

 

Your use of

is subject to the

Terms of Service.