Guest guest Posted November 8, 1999 Report Share Posted November 8, 1999 Charles: Well, all I can say is, this page outwardly appears to be legitimate in all aspects except for its page " For Women Only " . If it is only related as an informational page, then the practice may be legitimate; however, it truly has no place on a legitimate massage therapy practice page, as it is illegal to touch the genitals of a client no matter where you are. Since this is your website, and I have no clarification, I am going to place you on moderated status until I can verify your veracity and motivation for starting your relationship with our list in this way. whitehose wrote: > > whitehose > > > Thanks to all who have replied publicly or privately. You have all > been most helpful and I appreciate it. > > the general consensus seems to be " stay away from sex " and I agree. However > I refer to the turn of the century practice of giving " relief " to > females - see " why the vibrator was invented " > If you have a mind and the time to look at our website try this: > > http://www.powerup.com.au/~auzwiz/default.htm > > follow some of the interesting links on the links page for recreation. > > and then give me feedback > > Cheers > Charles > -- Caroline List Owner -- Rev. Caroline Gutierrez Abreu, BS, RN, CHTP/I, CRMT, CH Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 8, 1999 Report Share Posted November 8, 1999 thank you caroline, the energy in a couple of these posts made me feel really uneasy. i appreciate you taking initiative to check out intent, cause that is definitely what immediately came into question for me. i don't think it's just the reference to sexuality stuff, cause sexuality has been discussed here plenty and has never made me uncomfortable and is normally something i feel pretty open about. Caroline Abreu wrote: > Caroline Abreu <crow > > Charles: > > Well, all I can say is, this page outwardly appears to be legitimate > in all aspects except for its page " For Women Only " . If it is only > related as an informational page, then the practice may be legitimate; > however, it truly has no place on a legitimate massage therapy > practice page, as it is illegal to touch the genitals of a client no > matter where you are. > > Since this is your website, and I have no clarification, I am going to > place you on moderated status until I can verify your veracity and > motivation for starting your relationship with our list in this way. > > whitehose wrote: > > > > whitehose > > > > > > Thanks to all who have replied publicly or privately. You have all > > been most helpful and I appreciate it. > > > > the general consensus seems to be " stay away from sex " and I agree. However > > I refer to the turn of the century practice of giving " relief " to > > females - see " why the vibrator was invented " > > If you have a mind and the time to look at our website try this: > > > > http://www.powerup.com.au/~auzwiz/default.htm > > > > follow some of the interesting links on the links page for recreation. > > > > and then give me feedback > > > > Cheers > > Charles > > > > -- > Caroline > List Owner > -- > Rev. Caroline Gutierrez Abreu, BS, RN, CHTP/I, CRMT, CH > > > **************************************** > To from , send an email to - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 8, 1999 Report Share Posted November 8, 1999 Hello Group: Thank you for your support in this matter. I am not sure what exactly motivates trolls to do things like this, but it will not be tolerated. I was especially creeped out by the " singles " links on his page, and his blatant " BBW's Done Free " advert. The women's links were mostly porn, IMHO. It is very subtle, but it is subversive for truly legitimate therapists who are not out there doing illegal or immoral things to their vulnerable clients. If anyone here receives any inappropriate mail offlist from someone who is on moderated status, please let administration know right away so that you can be assisted with the problem. Blessings, Caroline kim wrote: > > kim <berlee > > thank you caroline, the energy in a couple of these posts made me feel really > uneasy. i > appreciate you taking initiative to check out intent, cause that is > definitely what > immediately came into question for me. i don't think it's just the reference > to sexuality > stuff, cause sexuality has been discussed here plenty and has never made me > uncomfortable > and is normally something i feel pretty open about. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.