let's think a little

[Guest guest]

Here is a story some of you may appreciate that I found on this

website...

http://www.cancertutor.com/Other/NoCancer.html

 

While it focuses on cancer, I think most of you will understand it

pokes

fun at *all* MD " therapies " that cut, burn, or poison the patient.

 

 

```````````````````````````````````

Suppose you own a nice, comfortable, $300,000 house in the country,

near a

small city. While you have gone to the store your house catches on

fire.

As you return home you see that two rooms of your house are in flames

and

the fire is spreading. You immediately call the fire department.

 

Twenty minutes later three fire trucks show up.

 

The men and women in the first fire truck pull out heavy suits and

axes

and run to the house and start cutting down parts of the house that

have

already burned, but are still smoldering. They furiously cut and cut

and

when they have cut out about 10% of the parts of the house that have

already burned, they quit and go back to their fire truck.

 

You note that they did absolutely nothing to stop the spreading of the

fire. What they cut out wasn't even burning and it certainly had

nothing

to do with stopping the raging fire.

 

You watch the men and women in the second fire truck pull out a fire

hose

and start spraying a powder on the fire. The amount of powder they

were

spraying did not seem to you to be enough to put out the fire. But you

notice that while the powder is slowing down the spreading of the

fire, it

is also severely damaging the parts of the house that are not on fire.

 

Puzzled, you ask the fireman what the powder is. They say it is a very

toxic acid that is capable of putting the fire out, but they can't

spray

very much of it on the fire because if they did, the entire house

would be

reduced to a pile of rubble by the acid. Thus, all they can do is slow

down the spreading of the fire, but they can't stop the spreading of

the

fire.

 

Even more puzzled, you ask them why they did not bring water in their

fire

truck. They said that in firefighter school they were taught that

water

was useless in putting out house fires. They said that using water on

a

house fire is an old " wives tale " and water is not effective. They

also

said that the state firefighter's union would fire any firefighter

that

used water on a house fire.

 

By sheer coincidence you are also aware that the federal regulatory

agency, the Fire Development Administration (FDA), has researched

water

and has declared that water is an " unproven " method to put out house

fires. The FDA says there is " insufficient evidence " as to water's

effectiveness and safety. You silently mumble to yourself that there

must

be a huge connection between the FDA, the firefighter's union, the

firefighter schools and the chemical companies.

 

While you have been talking to the men and women in the second truck,

five

men have jumped out of the third fire truck. They ask you where the

couch

is in the living room. You point in the general direction of the

couch in

the living room, which you assume by now is on fire.

 

Each of them immediately pulls out a 30-06 caliber rifle and starts

shooting at the couch from where they are standing next to their fire

truck. You scream at them and ask them what they are doing. They

respond

that they have been taught in firefighter's school that couches are

very

bad to have in a house during a fire, so they are trying to shoot the

couch to pieces. They comment: " We think we are doing some good. "

 

You say that even if the couch is helping spread the fire, that they

are

blowing holes in the front and back of the house trying to shoot the

couch

to pieces from outside the house. Furthermore, very impatiently, you

say

the fire has already spread far beyond where the couch is located.

 

While the spreading of the house fire did slow down because of the

toxic

acids, within two hours you no longer have a house. The fire men and

women

were quite proud that they slowed down the fire. They tell you that

your

house lasted an extra hour because of their work. You doubt the

accuracy

of that number. They give each other " high fives, " get in their fire

trucks, and head back to the fire station.

 

Between the fire, the acid and the bullets, your house has been

reduced to

rubble. The cutting out of the wood that had already burned, by the

first

fire truck, had absolutely no affect on stopping the fire. In fact,

nothing any of them did stopped the spreading of the fire, it only

slowed

it down.

 

You are astonished at what you have seen.

 

You ponder why the " investigative journalists " have not jumped on this

situation. Then you realize how much money the chemical companies

spend on

television advertisements and you realize why the " investigative

journalists " have kept their mouths shut.

 

A week later, as you drive by the fire department, you notice that

all of

the cars in the parking lot are very expensive cars.

 

A month later you know why they are driving very expensive cars. They

have

sent you a bill for their services: $100,000. But they note in the

bill

that the house insurance company will pay most of the bill. You are

amazed

when you look at your house insurance policy and realize the insurance

company will not pay the bill if the fire department uses water.

 

You ponder to yourself: " What is the connection between the fire

department, the firefighter's union, the firefighter's school, the

FDA,

the insurance companies, the television stations and the chemical

companies? "

 

One thing is clear to you, you now know why all of your friends think

the

firefighters are heroes, the television stations constantly portray

them

as heros in their shows.

 

As you research all of the connections between these organizations it

quickly becomes clear to you that all of them are owned or controlled

by

very wealthy people who are very, very good friends with each other.

You

have a brand new comprehension of what quid pro quo means - you

scratch my

back and I'll scratch your back. You conclude that a quid pro quo of

this

magnitude is another term for " conspiracy. "

 

End of Story