Guest guest Posted January 8, 2003 Report Share Posted January 8, 2003 TETANUS AND POLIO VACCINES - SOME FACTS FOR PARENTS WHO ARE WORRIED ABOUT THESE DISEASES by Viera Scheibner (Jan 1998) Mrs J Woods letter in the Summer 1997 edition of The Informed Parent inspired me to write this letter to the Editor of TIP. J Wood stopped any further vaccinations when she realized that her fully vaccinated child developed a most frightening episode of whooping cough and suffered chronic ill health for years because of all those vaccines injected into his system. Interestingly, the specialist confirmed to her that the child's immune system was not very strong, but the GP called her irresponsible when she decided not to continue with any further vaccine injections (I would not worry very much about a GP's advise since GP's in the UK labour under a major monetary conflict of interest in vaccinating). She stood her ground, however, but is still worried about diseases like tetanus and polio. 1. Tetanus is a very rare disease in developed countries: there are only about 12 cases of tetanus per year in Australia, and half of those who got it were vaccinated. Perhaps the most interesting thing about tetanus is that those who get it do not develop immunity to it. How does one get tetanus? Well, from deep puncture wounds. In other words the pathogen (Clostridium tetani) is literally injected into the body via the deep puncture wounds. Vaccine injection does the same thing: it bypasses the normal portals of entry (the mouth and nose) and delivers the pathogen and toxins straight into the blood stream which triggers an unnatural, abnormal, deranged immune response called sensitisation. Far from immunising, tetanus (and other) vaccine injections make the recipients more susceptible to diseases. J. Wood clearly saw it in her child: chronic ill health, recurrent coughs and colds for years. It is very likely, that the obvious improvements of her child's health was achieved by him finally developing whooping cough in its acute form. --any parents report either a marked improvement or disappearance of 'asthma after their vaccinated children developed acute whooping cough. Medical research demonstrated that having whooping cough prevents asthma. One must wonder how much of that 'asthma' is just a chronic whooping cough as a result of the vaccinated child's immune system being deranged by vaccination and not being able to mount a proper, acute, immune response. If this does not make sense, then perhaps something else will: the New England Journal of Medicine published in 1984 that tetanus booster injections result in the same derangement of T4 and T8 cells as seen in AIDS patients. A 'mysterious' new syndrome emerged in the US: thousands of children are developing AIDS symptoms (with deranged T4 and T8 cells) without being HIV positive My well-considered opinion is that it comes from that T (standing for tetanus) in the DPT vaccine. 2. Polio has been painted as some natural scourge of humanity. Yet, epidemics and outbreaks of polio in Europe go back to only less than 100 years. The 1949-50 and later outbreaks of polio were demonstrably caused by intensified diphtheria and whooping cough vaccination, tonsillectomies, other injections (painkillers) and a variety of traumas. They invented a name for it: provocation poliomyelitis. Even though this has not been discussed in literature, the earliest outbreaks were no doubt triggered by intensified smallpox vaccination. The evidence for this connection comes from Egyptian excavations: some mummies had withered limbs; but of course, variolation (a crude form of smallpox inoculation) has been practised thousands of years ago, and most particularly, in Egypt. When the first, injectable, polio vaccine was tested on 1.8 million American children, within a few days they had a huge epidemic of paralytic polio: in the vaccinated, their parents and other contacts. They called it the Cutter incident and claimed that some of the vaccines (produced by the Cutter Laboratories) contained live polio virus. So, the company withdrew their vaccines despite polio vaccines produced by other manufacturers also causing paralysis in this outbreak. The OP vaccines are officially causing paralysis, allegedly only 10-12 reported cases per year in the USA. The word 'reported' is the key word here. With the mass use of the polio vaccines and continuing occurrence of polio in the vaccinated, the necessity arose to redefine the disease polio. The classical definition of polio is a disease with residual paralysis which resolves within 2 months (usually within days). The new definition of polio now is 'a disease with residual paralysis persisting for more than 60 days.' This is the secret formula of 'eradication' of polio. Children are still getting polio, but those cases which resolve within 60 days (which represent some 90% of cases) are not diagnosed as polio. A new disease emerged: viral meningitis and as the incidence of polio plummeted, so did the incidence of viral meningitis sky rocketed. The best (and perhaps most frightening) example of these " elegant administrative moves " is how they allegedly eliminated polio in the Americas (meaning South America). The Journal of Infectious Diseases published in 1991 the results of a major vaccination drive between 1985 and 1989 to eliminate polio. Within 4 months they had a huge outbreak of paralytic polio (350 cases). They decided to reformulate the vaccine. Now if this outbreak had occurred in the unvaccinated they would not have had to reformulate the vaccine. The outbreak occurred in the vaccinated. However, the outbreaks with ever increasing number of reported cases of 'flaccid paralysis' in the vaccinated continued. So what did they do? They started discarding most of the reported cases of flaccid paralysis. Out of 2094 reported cases they only 'confirmed' 130, the rest (1964) were discarded. They published a graph which shows ever increasing number of reported cases as shadowy columns in the background and the ever decreasing numbers of confirmed cases as black columns in the forefront. I praise them for publishing it this way: any discerning and unbrainwashed reader can see very clearly what happened in the Americas between 1985 - 1989: mass vaccination caused sustained outbreaks of paralytic polio and they tried to camouflage it by discarding the vast majority of cases. When they finally stopped the program in 1989, even the number of reported cases (shown as those shadowy columns in the background) went down. The same happened in other countries: huge epidemics of paralysis followed mass-vaccination drives. How many vaccines does the child need to be protected? Children are given ever increasing numbers of 'boosters'. Why? This trend makes sense only when you consider that all those outbreaks and epidemics of any 'vaccine preventable' diseases occur in the vaccinated. The vaccines are ineffective. A shortage of space does not allow me to elaborate more on this interesting subject' There is only one immunity: the natural immunity which is achieved by children going through infectious diseases of childhood. They are here to prime and mature the immune system of children and they represent developmental milestones. Perhaps more on this subject in some of the next issues of TIP. Some problems with infectious diseases are results of mismanagement: if a child with severe measles is given antibiotics instead of vitamin A and C and its fever is suppressed you are asking for trouble. And last but not least: no matter how worried anybody is about diseases, one should remember one important thing, namely that vaccines do not prevent diseases, they make you sick. *** URL: http://www.whale.to/Vaccines/tetanus_and_polio.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 8, 2003 Report Share Posted January 8, 2003 Yea, it's pretty scary isn't it? I don't vaccinate my daughter which of course sends most people into a tizzy ya know? The people at the WIC office gave me such a hard time about it I quit going. My aunt called me all freaked out about a whooping cough outbreak a few counties away and telling me how I should get the shots already. She tells me that I'm one weird kid with alot of weird ideas - lol!! But I'll bet you $100 the kids that had it got it from the shot in the first place! I did pick up a homeopathic whooping cough remedy to have on hand just in case. Homeopathics are Definitely the way to go in my opinion! Peace, Mouse Jo wrote: Very interesting. I would suggest that parents go to a homeopath for alternative 'vaccination'. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 8, 2003 Report Share Posted January 8, 2003 Very interesting. I would suggest that parents go to a homeopath for alternative 'vaccination'. Jo HEALTH: TETANUS AND POLIO VACCINES - SOME FACTS... ---Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).Version: 6.0.435 / Virus Database: 244 - Release 30/12/02 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 9, 2003 Report Share Posted January 9, 2003 Mouse, Comments below: --- WildMouse <wildmouse wrote: > TETANUS AND POLIO VACCINES - SOME FACTS FOR PARENTS > WHO ARE WORRIED > ABOUT THESE DISEASES by Viera Scheibner (Jan 1998) > > The classical definition of polio is a > disease with residual > paralysis which resolves within 2 months (usually > within days). The new > definition of polio now is 'a disease with residual > paralysis persisting > for more than 60 days.' This is the secret formula > of 'eradication' of > polio. Children are still getting polio, but those > cases which resolve > within 60 days (which represent some 90% of cases) > are not diagnosed as > polio. Interesting! I had polio. It was not diagnosed at the time. (Mild case). It did " resolve itself " in a 3 week period. I had no aftereffects. I was diagnosed as having strep throat and given the usual Penicillin injection they gave back then. It made no difference. I stayed extremely sick for about 3 weeks. Only as an adult, my polio was diagnosed. It shows in your bones if you've had it, and I was having a constantly dislocating patella. (Kneecap for any who don't know). Doctors couldn't help me, but I did eventually help myself. I went with what 2 doctors had told me: " You had polio. " I remembered the " strep throat " and figured that was when I had it. Every other strep throat I had cleared up immediately after I received penicillin. Anyway, I have bigtime twisting of the muscles on the affected side of my body. This started probably during my 20's but I didn't begin to have problems until I was in my 30's. I did measure my legs. One is 2 " shorter than the other. That probably contributed to the muscle twisting, but polio does that too. I am constantly working on untwisting the muscles in my body. That stopped the constant dislocations of my patella. If you've never had a dislocated patella, I can tell you the pain is just unbearable. I also went through about 10 years of post-polio syndrome. It's like someone is stabbing your legs and you lose all the strength in them. I would have fallen to the floor if I'd tried to walk when that was happening and it happened all the time! I just stood and waited for it to pass which it did within a minute or so. Doctors said exercise would not help it. It DID help it! But, doctors are not much help with so many things. You really have to follow your own instincts and knowledge. I also had the polio vaccine when it came out. It was the live virus - the Salk vaccine. (Because I wasn't diagnosed as having polio when I had it, no one knew I'd had it)! I've always wondered if that contributed to the problems I had later. > I praise them for publishing it this way: > any discerning and > unbrainwashed reader can see very clearly what > happened in the Americas > between 1985 - 1989: mass vaccination caused > sustained outbreaks of > paralytic polio and they tried to camouflage it by > discarding the vast > majority of cases. This is very interesting to me. > The vaccines are > ineffective. I JUST read a news story that the flu vaccine is pretty much ineffective in anyone over 50. I never have taken it since I figured it was BS. Interesting article, Mouse! Thank you. Penny H Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.