Stop More Nuclear Subsidies in Energy bill

[Guest guest]

ALERT ALERT

ALERT

 

BILLIONS IN NUCLEAR POWER SUBSIDIES MAY BE ADDED TO OIL DRILLING/ENERGY

BILLS WHEN CONGRESS RETURNS

CONTACT YOUR SENATORS AND REPRESENTATIVES NOW:

NO MORE NUCLEAR SUBSIDIES!

Dear Sustainable Energy Advocates:

When Congressmembers return to Washington after Labor Day, we expect fast

action in both the Senate and House on new energy legislation. Exactly what

that new energy legislation will be is not clear at this point, but

behind-the-scenes, nuclear industry advocates are gearing up for a new push for

billions

of dollars in new taxpayer subsidies for new reactor construction and other

industry wish list items.

It is important to contact both of your senators, and your representative

now, before they return to Washington and things begin moving quickly. Most

Congressmembers are back in their home districts so it is worth contacting both

their Washington offices and local offices. It is also a good idea to meet

them on the campaign trail and bring up nuclear subsidies at campaign events.

The Capitol Switchboard is 202-224-3121. You can also look up your House

member’s direct contact information here:

_http://www.house.gov/house/MemberWWW_by_State.shtml#va_

(http://www.house.gov/house/MemberWWW_by_State.shtml#va)

and your Senators’ information here:

_http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm_

(http://www.senate.

gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm)

The message to your Congressmembers is simple: No More Nuclear Subsidies! Do

Not Include ANY Nuclear Subsidies in any energy bills.

Public opinion polls continue to show that nuclear power is just about the

least popular energy option, while renewable energy sources continue to be the

most supported by the public. For example, a NBC/Wall Street Journal poll

released August 20 found that 72% believe developing “alternative†(i.e.

renewable) energy sources could “accomplish a great deal.†Only about 40%

said

that of new nuclear power. Similarly, an August 9 ABC News poll found only 44%

support new reactor construction. Congress shouldn’t fall for the nuclear

industry’s self-serving pronouncements about the need or public support for

new

nuclear power.

Please contact your Congressmembers today.

Thanks for all you do.

Michael Mariotte

Executive Director

Nuclear Information and Resource Service

_nirsnet_ (nirsnet) ; _www.nirs.org_

(http://www.nirs.org/) ; 301-270-6477

Background information

In early August, 10 senators—five Democrats and five Republicans—released a

“compromise†energy plan to allow for some offshore oil drilling. The group

has been dubbed the Gang of 10. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid has

indicated he is likely to allow a vote on an energy bill in September. However,

the

Gang of 10 have not yet put their compromise into legislative form, so there

is no bill number or exact language. While the Gang of 10’s plan has been

widely reported on, few have noticed that their plan includes $80+ to $160+

Billion in new subsidies for the nuclear power industry.

In the House, Speaker Nancy Pelosi has indicated she too is likely to allow

a vote on some sort of energy bill in September. Again, no specific bill

language has yet been announced. However, a group of predominately Republican

House members have introduced what they call the “All of the Above†energy

bill

(HR 6384) which would include about $120 billion in new nuclear subsidies.

While neither the Gang of 10’s nor the All of the Above proposals are likely

to be voted on as is, the threat that massive new nuclear subsidies will be

added to an energy package is very real. That’s why it’s so important to

contact your Members now, before a final energy bill is introduced.

Michele Boyd of Physicians for Social Responsibility has provided the

following list of items that currently are in the two main proposals so far:

 

Billions of Dollars of Nuclear Subsidies Hidden in Proposed Offshore

Drilling Bills

New Energy Reform Act of 2008

(Not in legislative form yet; bill number not available)

 

TOTAL subsidies for nuclear power: $87.8 billion - $166.7 billion

· Increases Number of Nuclear Regulatory Commission Staff: Increases

NRC staff to process applications for new reactors and to further streamline

the licensing process. In FY08, NRC has budgeted $216.9 million for 587

full-time-equivalent (FTE) staff to review 12 new reactor applications. This

is

an increase of $124.3 million for 283 additional FTE staff compared to FY07.

The cost to taxpayers will be $12.4 million in FY08. As many as 8

additional applications are expected in FY09.

· Funds Nuclear Workers Training Program: Authorizes $100 million

over 5 years for the Department of Labor to implement training programs for

nuclear workers.

· Creates Working Group to Promote US Nuclear Manufacturing: Creates

interagency working group to promote a domestic manufacturing base for

nuclear components and equipment.

· Builds Reprocessing Facility: Authorizes funding and directs DOE

to begin construction on a reprocessing R & D facility within one year.

According to DOE in March 2006, such a facility would cost $1.5 billion.

· Authorizes DOE to Enter Into Risk Insurance Contracts: Allows DOE

to enter into contracts for “standby support†(i.e. “risk insurance†to

pay

the industry for delays in obtaining NRC approval to turn on a constructed

reactor). EPACT 2005 authorized $2 billion for this subsidy to cover 6 new

reactors.

· Authorizes Unlimited Loan Guarantees (estimated cost: $84.2

billion to $163.1 billion*):

o Expands the definition of “project costs†to include startup and

financing costs, which puts billions more taxpayer dollars at risk.

o Provides for a combination of appropriations and project sponsor funding

to pay for the administrative and subsidy costs (currently this funding is

to come only from the project sponsor).

o Exempts the loan guarantee program from Sec. 504(b) of FCRA. Under this

section of FCRA, DOE is required to obtain congressional budget authority

before committing to loan guarantees. This provision would eliminate this

requirement, thereby allowing DOE to give out unlimited guarantees without

congressional authorization.

o Clarifies that the loan guarantees can cover 80% of 100% of the project

costs (unclear from summary whether it actually requires this, but likely).

* The nuclear industry is proposing 34 new reactors. Current estimates per

reactor (without cost overruns) range from $6.2 billion to $12 billion per

reactor. Unlimited loan guarantees that cover 80% of the 34 projects would

guarantee $168.6 billion to $326.4 billion. The nuclear industry expects to pay

$100 million in fees. Assuming these reactors have the 50% default rate as

projected by the Congressional Budget Office, the taxpayer cost would be $84.2

billion to $163.1 billion.

Americans for American Energy Act of 2008 (HR 6384)

TOTAL subsidies for nuclear power: > $120 billion

· Subsidizes Reprocessing of Spent Fuel (Sec. 501): Authorizes the

use of the Nuclear Waste Fund to make grants to or enter into contracts with

companies for reprocessing of spent nuclear fuel (Sec. 501). There is currently

about $20 billion in the Nuclear Waste Fund, far less than would be needed

to reprocess spent fuel in the U.S. According to the National Academy of

Sciences, reprocessing only the spent fuel that we have today would cost at

least

$100 billion.

· Fast-Tracks and Subsidizes Rulemaking for Reprocessing Facilities

(Sec. 502): Requires the NRC to complete a rulemaking for reprocessing

facilities within 2 years and authorizes Nuclear Waste Fund money to cover

NRC’s

costs. This is extremely premature because DOE does not know the full

complement of necessary technologies will be or if they would ever work.

· Takes the Nuclear Waste Fund “Off-Budget†– Takes the Nuclear

Waste Fund “off-budget†so that expenditures from the Fund are not counted

as

part of Congress’ spending or the national deficit (Sec. 503). Currently,

Congress must approve expenditures from the Nuclear Waste Fund annually in an

appropriation bill and these expenditures are counted as part of the federal

deficit. This change would allow $20 billion of nuclear ratepayers’ money to

flow unchecked into the troubled Yucca Mountain Project to develop a nuclear

waste repository in Nevada and into restarting the failed nuclear waste

reprocessing effort of the 1970s.

· Codifies Waste Confidence (Sec. 504) – Prevents the NRC from being

able to deny a license or permit application on the grounds that there is

nowhere for nuclear waste to go. The NRC’s “waste confidence rule,â€

states

that there will be a repository for spent fuel “in a timely manner†and

therefore the agency does not need to consider the problem of waste piling up at

nuclear reactor sites as part of its review of license extensions or new license

applications. This provision would codify this rule by forbidding the NRC

from denying an application on the grounds that there is not sufficient

capacity. Given that the only proposed site for a permanent geologic repository

has

not yet begun the NRC’s licensing process and that the site is more than 20

years from accepting waste even if it is licensed, it is unlikely that waste

will be moving from reactor sites “in a timely manner.†This measure would

bypass what should be a scientific and technical determination and sets up the

federal government for additional lawsuits by the nuclear industry for

failing to meet its commitment to dispose of spent nuclear fuel.

· Gives Tax Break for Nuclear Components Certification (Sec. 505) –

Gives a 15% tax credit to companies for ASME nuclear component certification

or for increasing capacity to construct, assemble, or install nuclear

components from 2008 to the end of 2019. A large number of parts used to build

a

nuclear reactor must be certified by the American Society of Mechanical

Engineers (ASME), which costs between $25,000 and $35,000 per certification.

This

tax break, valid until 2019, would cost taxpayers as much as $5,250 per

certification.

· Authorizes Nuclear Science and Engineering Scholarships (Sec

1109): Requires that the Department of Energy award at least 65 grants of

400,000

over 4 years to undergraduate institutions to provide scholarships to

students studying nuclear science and engineering. This program would cost

taxpayers

at least $26 million.

· Requires Recommendations on Nuclear Workforce Development (Sec.

1110) – Requires that within 120 days the Department of Energy provide

Congress

with recommendations for developing the nuclear workforce in the U.S.

Gives Away Cash Prize for Technologies to Store Spent Fuel (Sec. 1203) –

Requires the Department of Energy to award undetermined amounts of cash prizes

to advance innovative energy technologies and new energy sources, including

awards for storing spent nuclear fuel.

 

------

You can support NIRS and the Nuclear Pushback Campaign on our secure website

_here._

(https://org2.democracyinaction.org/o/5502/shop/custom.jsp?donate_page_KEY=341)

Your tax-deductible contributions will help us buy blog ads,

monitor and respond to the media, and help turn around the current energy

debate!

Please make a donation of $5, $10, $25 or any amount you choose—your

donations will be put to good use!

And if you haven’t done so yet, don’t forget to sign the statement on

nuclear power and climate at _www.nirs.org_ (http://www.nirs.org/) (but please

don

’t sign more than once!). If you’ve already signed, please ask your friends

and colleagues to sign!

We’ve passed 7750 7830 7930 8,130 8,330, 8400 8500 signatures, let’s get to

10,000! And just let us know at _nirsnet_ (nirsnet)

if you want more paper copies of the statement to gather signers at events,

concerts, conferences, etc. We’re adding paper signers as fast as we can

(but seem to be always a few hundred behind….).

 

----------------------------

This is the NIRS E-Mail Alert list. You are on this list because you signed

up on our website, at a NIRS table at a concert, on a petition, or directly

to NIRS. Your name and address are never sold, rented, or traded with anyone

for any reason.

For address changes or to , just send an e-mail to

_nirsnet_ (nirsnet) . If you have friends or

colleagues who would

like to be on this list, have them send a note to _nirsnet_

(nirsnet)

 

 

 

 

 

**************It's only a deal if it's where you want to go. Find your travel

deal here.

(http://information.travel.aol.com/deals?ncid=aoltrv00050000000047)