Significant Increase in Incidence of Cancer in Indian Infants.

[Guest guest]

http://www.indianpediatrics.net/dec2007/dec-939-941.htm TABLE I Significant Trends in Cumulative Risks of Childhood Cancers in India during 1982-2000 Childhood cancer site(ICD-10) Increase/decline trend in cumulative risk(Risk range for 100,000 children)* Female Male Bone (C-40-41) Increase; P = 0.005, R2 = 60.4 (Bangalore)[3.0, 8.0] - Eye (C-69) – Decline; P = 0.026, R2 = 43.9 (Mumbai)[6.0, 2.0] Brain and nervous system Increase, P = 0.033, R2 = 41.3 – (C-70-72) (Mumbai) [6.0, 175] Non Hodgkin’s lymphoma Increase P = 0.041, R2 = 68.8 Increase P = 0.011, R2 = 53.1 (C-82-83, 96) (Delhi) (Mumbai) [4.0, 10] [10.0, 15.0] Increase, P = 0.039, R2 = 69.5 (Bhopal) [0.0, 20.0] Lymphoid leukemia Increase P = 0.006, R2 = 59.3 – ( C-91) (Chennai) [14, 33] Myeloid leukemia Increase P = 0.037, R2 = 79.6 – C=92-94 (Bhopal) [0.0, 6.0] Leukemia unspecified Increase P = 0.047, R2 = 36.9 Decline P = 0.001,R2 = 96.8 ( C-95) (Chennai) (Delhi) [0.0, 5.0] [20.0, 6.0] Decline P = 0.033, R2 = 72.1 (Delhi) [8.0, 1.0] All childhood cancers Increase P = 0.001, R2 = 70.0 Increase P = 0.009,R2 = 54.6 (Chennai) (Mumbai) [79.0, 117.0] [139, 155]*Range for the years 1982 to 2000 for Bangalore, Mumbai and Chennai; 1988 to 2000 for the Barshi, Delhi and Bhopal. Positive and negative trends are indicated by “Increase” and “decline” respectively. Blank cell (-) indicate no statistical significance observed in any registry for this childhood cancer site. ICD: International Classification of Disease (Version no. 10 There is no longer any serious doubt that health officials are covering up a big

story, trying to side step a growing swell of evidence that threatens the very foundation of medical science and practice. It is obvious that the medical profession cannot afford to have the public ever find out the truth about vaccination for there is simply just too much at stake for them. - Dr Mark Sircus, MD.

Forgot the famous last words? Access your message archive online.