Guest guest Posted June 29, 2003 Report Share Posted June 29, 2003 Linda The PSA test is notoriously wrong. It measures a protein specific androgen in the blood stream, whose levels are affected by exercise, dairy, and several drugs (antibiotics being one). It has been estimated recently to be accurate on 42% of occasions. 92% of doctors, asked if they would have a PSA test every 2 years when they reached 50 said 'NO' (Uk research). Two big charities say that you may not even need a prostate operation for 10 years or more on 'diagnosis'. In the UK we are highlighting this sort of inane mis- information every month and have been for quite a while. I give a two hour lecture in the UK, on just these points and cover several cancers (Breast, prostate, colon) I'm on the West Coast in Jan/Feb and in Australia in March/April. However, rushing to a conclusion that 'fungi are what is measured in a PSA test' and shouting about it as you have done just gets all us 'integrated' truth tellers a bad name. You need to get an open minded biochemist on the team. Some fungal biochemical by-products could screw up a PSA test but what you have said is simply not factually accurate. Misreading of some fungal activity has actually been confused with leukaemia and some microbes make an alcohol that feeds cancer cells. The UK expert is Gerald Green and he's featured in icon June and in my cancer diet book the Tree of life - about things to sadd in to your diet (not take out) to beat cancer. Microbes do play a very crucial role. You must also not confuse microbes, fungi, amoeba, parasites etc as 'fungi', each link to cancer but each do it differently. Chris iconmag.co.uk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 29, 2003 Report Share Posted June 29, 2003 Saw the following on another forum: I am learning a tremendous amount now about the role fungi play in cancer development. One of the most astonishing facts is that prostate cancer, which scares men terribly, with reason, is frequently diagnosed by the PSA test - because the PSA test is actually testing for levels of various fungi in the blood stream! According to Doug Kaufmann, author of "The Germ That Causes Cancer", the PSA test is going to read VERY HIGH if administered within 2-6 weeks of the man having been on antibiotics because of the danger they pose to our intestinal flora and the havoc they wreak on our systems. The number of men who go the radiation/chemotherapy/surgery route is pathetic, when an antifungal medication or natural antifungal like Neem might have done the trick safely in a matter of a week or so! In short, it isn't REALLY cancer. And when it is - as in women's breast cancer or something like that - the cause, according to them, is STILL the same - fungi and mycotoxins. I know there are a number of anti-cancer natural remedies out there - and I'll bet all I have that at their core they are actually anti-fungal in nature, though that knowledge may not be readily apparent. These authors also show a case of a young boy - an infant really - with "leukemia" following a course of antibiotics - but the savvy parents found someone who know about fungal infestation, had antifungal remedies given, and within 6 weeks there was no longer any clinical evidence of leukemia. A miracle? No. Just adherence to physical laws. So it seems evident to me: get rid of the fungi, KEEP THEM AT BAY through a continuous program of adequate nutrition and moderate use of anti-fungals like Neem to stop any overgrowth, and I honestly feel we have nothing to fear from cancer, ever. I can see a change in the course of my Type II diabetes after 6 weeks on the Neem, too. I've met several others whose sugars are now absolutely normal, all the time, after undergoing this program and staying on it for maintenance. I will be pursuing this vein of thought more and more, because I believe it will lead to healings the likes of which nobody has ever dreamed of. Of course, the medical cartel won't like it - they have a vested interest in our staying sick. I have a vested interest, as someone who markets the finest herbs, vitamins, minerals, enzymes, probiotics, Ayurvedic remedies, and other supplements she can find, in GETTING AND KEEPING YOU WELL. The medical route has failed. Only taking responsibility for our own lives and health will work. Hopefully, everyone who reads these forums is interested in DOING JUST THAT. :-) Linda Simply the BEST all-around nutrition ever! www.prostarvitamin.com/22284 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 2, 2003 Report Share Posted July 2, 2003 Thanks, Chris, for the information but you wrote " UK expert is Gerald Green and he's featured in icon June " --- so, what's icon? I'm curious, is it a magazine? And if you have any tips for dealing with fungi, please share. I'm concerned and still hoping to find something that works for me. - Anna At 05:03 AM 6/29/03 EDT, Chris wrote: >Linda >The PSA test is notoriously wrong. It measures a protein specific androgen in >the blood stream, whose levels are affected by exercise, dairy, and several >drugs (antibiotics being one). It has been estimated recently to be accurate on >42% of occasions. 92% of doctors, asked if they would have a PSA test every 2 >years when they reached 50 said 'NO' (Uk research). Two big charities say >that you may not even need a prostate operation for 10 years or more on >'diagnosis'. > >In the UK we are highlighting this sort of inane mis- information every month >and have been for quite a while. I give a two hour lecture in the UK, on just >these points and cover several cancers (Breast, prostate, colon) I'm on the >West Coast in Jan/Feb and in Australia in March/April. > >However, rushing to a conclusion that 'fungi are what is measured in a PSA >test' and shouting about it as you have done just gets all us 'integrated' truth >tellers a bad name. You need to get an open minded biochemist on the team. >Some fungal biochemical by-products could screw up a PSA test but what you have >said is simply not factually accurate. > >Misreading of some fungal activity has actually been confused with leukaemia >and some microbes make an alcohol that feeds cancer cells. The UK expert is >Gerald Green and he's featured in icon June and in my cancer diet book the Tree >of life - about things to sadd in to your diet (not take out) to beat cancer. >Microbes do play a very crucial role. You must also not confuse microbes, >fungi, amoeba, parasites etc as 'fungi', each link to cancer but each do it >differently. > > >Chris > >iconmag.co.uk > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 3, 2003 Report Share Posted July 3, 2003 icon stands for Integrated cancer and oncology news; and yes it's a monthly mag for people touched by cancer. We started it a year ago and everybody seems to rave about it. Our web site is poor (www.iconmag.co.uk) but should be updated finally in about two weeks. We featured a review on 'microbes' in June - I'll try and attach my file notes. Chris Ps we should do a web link Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.