After PSA test, next is the turn of mammograms

[Guest guest]

Three years ago, the danger in getting screened for breast cancer was

posted on this list at message 4314. That mammograms are unreliable

and perhaps boost the number of cases through scare mongering rather

than giving relief was the point in conclusion.

 

Same conclusion is now reached by another author, where mammogram is

presented as " carcinogenic " please visit:

 

Biggest breast cancer risk that no one is talking about:

/message/7317

 

_____________

Some material on PSA test was seen yesterday on this list. Next is

the turn of mammograms. How reliable they are can be checked at:

 

http://www.forbes.com/lifestyle/health/feeds/hscout/2005/07/19/\

hscout526935.html

 

.....

 

WE need serious thinking now. When there is no fool proof test and

one has to go through further testing/biopsy etc. what about the

fear

psychosis/anxiety generated tumors? (see message no. 4268)

[Guest guest]

Biopsy would appear to be one of the most inadvisable and dangerous

diagnostic techniques for breast cancer, or any other cancer, but there are

other less mainstream techniques to ensure that cancers are not present,

such as kinesiology or pulse diagnosis as well as Vascular Autonomic Signal

diagnostic technique all of which in the hands of the experienced

practitioner will pin point any problem within the individual. Just as I feel

sure any experienced Ayurvedic practitioner would be able to discern whether or

not a patient had any life threatening illness.

 

Jane