Guest guest Posted November 3, 2005 Report Share Posted November 3, 2005 At 08:15 PM 11/2/2005, you wrote: >Hey Marge, > >Your SpamCop has blocked the last two e-mails I sent to you. ;-) Butch I don't RUN one!!!! the long one you sent came thru just fine.... ????? Celebrating 10 years online. Supplying pure Essential Oils, Aromatherapy Accessories, Information and more! Visit us at: <http://www.naturesgift.com> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 5, 2008 Report Share Posted July 5, 2008 I have stopped responding to this list serve, just because of this----unnecessary ego trips and fights about who is " right " , and whose words count in the end. I do read your columns and chuckle everytime that nothing has really changed here. talking of mis-spellings, you have mis-spelled several times in the past. When one types fast, and does not have the patience to read what has been written, just to get one's answers " out there " quickly, these things do happen. You have also " erred " similarly in the past. I also agree with Dr Muzumdar that you do have a tendency to show that only you are a critical thinker. You do have a fund of knowledge, which is valuable, but you are wasting it in unnecessary arguments. Why not let the intelligent reader of this list-serve judge the validity of the information, and sift through all different " angles " and judge for oneself what is really helpful ? Between you Todd and Dr Bhate, and some other Ayurveda-Nazis,( who were not even Ayurvedists, or " ayurvaidists " , but Homeopaths, but whose " ayurvedic " arguments were used only to bash " modern medicine " ) you guys do not want to listen to anyone else, and think that everything is either cow-urine therapy only, or some mumbo jumbo, using all sorts of arguments to prove one's theories. Either we accept that modern medicine has some valid contributions or we should stop using terms like GABA and stuff like that, when there aren't " real / adequate " studies to prove the ayurvedic treatments. Another person has a good question ---about education of Emergency Treatments. Instead of accepting that Current Ayurvedic education or treatment does not address this issue, Dr Bhate has again gone into questionable and round about ways to " address " a non-answer with verbal acrobatics, which only he understands, and with references to his own long, past, non-answers, as if they are " valid studies " of any sort. Such references are meaningless to any serious student of Ayurveda or to a serious student of science. Just because one refers to one's own " past tirades " does not make them valid, except in one's own mind. Let us accept that Modern medicine did come about for some reason. Either because of failure of Ayurvedic treatment as in Pneumonias ( antibiotics ) or because of inadequate solution for emergency treatment for acute emergencies such as Asthma. Let us also accept that neither does Modern medicine " cure " everything, and nor does " ayurveda " . Let us also accept that surgery, is the proper solution at times, otherwise there would not have been " ayurvedic sugical treatments " !! We should use Modern medicines to help relieve the patient's acute problems, and not treat our own egos or our own biases, until we find out " ayurvedic " treatments for acute emergencies or for life threatening illnesses. Let us also conduct proper scientific studies with ayurvedic medicines, before trying to prove a point. That will help the patient and will also help Ayurveda. That is my firm opinion. Durgesh Mankikar,MD Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 6, 2008 Report Share Posted July 6, 2008 i agree 100% with you about egos and the arguments that get in the way. there should also be a certain respect for true vaidyas (BAMS especially) from india as they are the authority on the matter. of course inquiry (from all people) should never been seen as disrespect as well, contrary to indian values perhaps. dialectic i believe is still important especially for ayurveda and its resurgence. so its a blend of respect but at the same time of inquiry. that balance will need to be drawn by trial and error and understanding. namaskar, __________ Raja Gursahani (: 559.474.8576 ,: rajagursahani Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 7, 2008 Report Share Posted July 7, 2008 Dear Dr. Durgesh Mankikar: This 's objective is to share and obtain information on ayurveda. As you rightly said, lay people like me have enough brains to cross- check the fact Vs fiction presented here before we rush out and buy a cow. And, no one gets an Oscar for upstaging anyone here. It pains me that you needlessly attack Dr Bhate & Dr. Todd. Between the two of them, they posted over 25% of the messages on this message board - most of them quite useful to the masses. That is quite a lot of time in front of the computer to help lay people like me who live in far off corners of the world. When someone comes up with a problem / question / clarification, they (guys) give their viewpoint. You are most welcome to do the same for the advancement of ayurveda or to help the 'aam aadmi' with your knowledge of ayurveda. Internet is like a free country. If you don't like something that is said here, please tell us why it should not be done that way. I assure you, the members of this group are smart enough to pickup the right advise. As Thyagaraja said, Endaro mahanubhavulu, Andariki vandanamulu (So many enlightened souls, pranam to all). K Ramayya ____________________ I have stopped responding to this list serve, --- I do read your columns and chuckle everytime that nothing has really changed here. Why not let the intelligent reader of this list-serve judge the validity of the information, and sift through all different " angles " and judge for oneself what is really helpful ? Between you Todd and Dr Bhate, and some other Ayurveda-Nazis,.. you guys do not want to listen to anyone else, and think that everything is either cow-urine therapy only, or some mumbo jumbo, using all sorts of arguments to prove one's theories. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 7, 2008 Report Share Posted July 7, 2008 Dear Durgesh Your observation is correct. In every field you will find egoistic stalwarts. There is good subhashita in sanskrut Aguni [Non Intelligent] Guninam Vetti [ respects intelligent personality] Guni Gunishu matsari [ intelligent people hate another intelligent person] Guni cha Gunaragi cha virala saralojanaha [ but respecting an intelligent person by another intelligent persone is a rare phenomena ] Vaidya Upadhye http://www.astroayurvedalogy.com http://www.astrotreat.blogspot.com __________ I have stopped responding to this list serve, just because of this----unnecessary ego trips and fights about who is " right " , and whose words count in the end. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 8, 2008 Report Share Posted July 8, 2008 dear kodanda ramayya, with due respect to your opinion, if something is pushed in the name of Ayurveda, is it not the duty of a vigilant person to point it out so? it is easy to give sermons and listen to lectures, but when one has to personally face a health risk which could degrade to life-threatening condition, just because he/she relied on opinions, many a times from non-vaidyas/doctors, who will be responsible? i doubt whether how many of the advisors have personally worked in hospitals attending them in life-threatening conditions before boasting their Ayurvedic achievements? please think over Dr.D.B.Muzumdar ________ This 's objective is to share and obtain information on ayurveda. As you rightly said, lay people like me have enough brains to cross- check the fact Vs fiction presented here before we rush out and buy a cow. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 9, 2008 Report Share Posted July 9, 2008 I really appreciate Dr.Muzumdar's contribution to this forum and for projecting the current system of Ayurveda as approved by the Govt of India in the right manner. His cautious, practical and methodical approach along with 18 years of clinical experience in treating patients speaks volumes about his diligence. For acute and emergency conditions as Ayurveda consumers we need to excercise caution before taking any self-medication, going by hear-say and using freely available internet information. I have read Dr.Muzumdar's posts with great interest and he has always projected Ayurveda in the right perspective keeping emotions and religious dogmas aside. He has even thrown light on the practicalities of which system of medicine to use in emergency conditions and has not bashed allopathy system just because he is an Ayurveda practitioner. I hope I get a chance to consult him next time when I'm in India. -Pradeep _______ with due respect to your opinion, if something is pushed in the name of Ayurveda, is it not the duty of a vigilant person to point it out so? it is easy to give sermons and listen to lectures, but when one has to personally face a health risk which could degrade to life-threatening condition, just because he/she relied on opinions, many a times from non-vaidyas/doctors, who will be responsible? i doubt whether how many of the advisors have personally worked in hospitals attending them in life-threatening conditions before boasting their Ayurvedic achievements? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.