Guest guest Posted May 13, 2007 Report Share Posted May 13, 2007 Devotion, meditation, keen observation and love for profession of " helping people lead healthy life " , gives a gift to Vaidya. Catching a disorder even before it shows up as symptoms of a specific disease. Hands, feet and face are mirrors to health. Just see how much indication hair and nails give. The nutritional deficiencies are now being detected by hair analysis! Vaidya has to be observant and add to his knowledge. If disease is detected well before it has gathered " strong symptoms " even home remedies are seen to work, without resorting to extracts, antibiotics etc. Modern tests, while helping patients giving proof that something is wrong, author came across several instances where tests were misleading. Author is not prejudiced against the tests, but the malpractices have crept in, which cause tears. Even ECGs are not reliable! In few cases, certain medication is needed " life-long " was also seen wrong, but addiction required long time to remove, thanks to satvik medicines from mother cow! When the statement reg. tests was made for PCOS, the indications on body were also given as retained in original appended message here. Every chronic disease leaves its future footprint in sufficient advance on body or natal chart, unfortunately that is not the subject taught to vaidyas these days. Author is not averse to using modern terminology, since modern population finds it easy to understand and correlate with modern science practice. Tests help modern thinking patient feel certain that he has a specific disorder, as also practitioners to impress his clients by predicting in advance such a test outcome. But patient feels more impressed by cure rather than such things. Unfortunately, there have been instances were tests are misleading. Beauty of Ayurveda is no difficulty for a vaidya if a disease is undefined by name, if vaidya can understand patients doshas in totality by pulse, not symptoms alone, and also make a proper synthesis of the situation. If that is the case, vaidya can as well recommend kaphagenic diet to a child suffering from worms, or a person suffering from gas +bloating. Also, correct herbal recommendation will arise, even if vaidya does not know whether a certain condition is called PCOS in modern science, it arises from insulin resistance etc. Patient tells his present symptoms, but his earlier situation, scars, trauma by previous modern medication, totality must be taken into account. Hence synthis and not analysis. Real test for a vaidya is to tell patient what he is suffering from, without a single modern test, or patient speaking a word. Of course patient must allow complete examination as desired by vaidya. When we say modern tests are necessary to understand disease in a better sense, we have to admit that ayurveda has deficiencies or lacks sufficient sense. We need modern tests, since we dislike doing the urine tests, feces tests ourselves. Modern science has created cast classes, where a consultant is a brahmin, surgen a kshatriya, drug company Vaisya and pathologist or technician a shoodra ( as he handles wastes of body). Look at preferences after CET and this becomes obvious. Not many would like to take up physiotherapy, if bds admission is available. ayurveda is of course last choice for most, it is only few who would like to go to ayurveda, despiet mbbs admission feasibility! How many practice 100% ayurveda after going to field? A question posed by Jagannath on this list still remains unanswered! While author admits there are karmic diseases, incurables, but ayurveda community should keep researching and adding to their storehouse. Panchgavya medicines e.g. Many cancer tumors have become dormant, if patient did not have a history of surgery, chemo and radiations! This is new addition to ayurveda, and not many practitioners are willing to add, since Cancer Industry itself growing at rate better than multiplication rate of malignant cells. And author has seen MD(Ayu) giving vaccine jabs! Why not ayurvedic community teach people reg ayurvedic vaccines. We should offer better alternative to modern science rather than taking its help to further real interests of Vaisyas! ayurveda , muzumdar <dahpc wrote: > > Dear Shirish Bhate > If vaidya should not suggest any modern tests, then should not the modern diagnostic terminology like PCOS also be avoided? > I personally feel that there should be no prejudice towards anything that adds to our knowledge in understanding the patient's diseased condition in a better sense. ayurveda , muzumdar <dahpc wrote: > > Dear Shirish Bhate > If vaidya should not suggest any modern tests, then should not the modern diagnostic terminology like PCOS also be avoided? > I personally feel that there should be no prejudice towards anything that adds to our knowledge in understanding the patient's diseased condition in a better sense. > > > Dr.D.B.Muzumdar > M.D.Ayu-Med > < dahpc > > - > Shirish Bhate > <snip> Fasting > sugar and serum insulin levels may be useful markers to judge, suggested here since remote patient. Vaidya should not suggest any modern tests. Darkening of skin on knees, elbow-joint, back side of neck, ankle bone, groin, arm-pits. skin tags, brownish spots of wheat grain size on cheeks where acne normally show up, excess fat near navel, double chin, so many indications!! > <snip> > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.