Guest guest Posted May 9, 2007 Report Share Posted May 9, 2007 Dear Friends, Next month I travel internationally to a weeklong event which will include consumption of meat and probable food combining challenges. I have been vegetarian for 15 years. I am a 60-yr-old PV, significantly underweight male; in good health and strong agni. Would it be beneficial to begin introducing meat into my diet now? Any suggestions about herbs/spices (available in the US) that would mitigate this onslaught of animal fat? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 9, 2007 Report Share Posted May 9, 2007 is there no posibility at all to have vegetarian food? zjohnallan <zjohnallan I have been vegetarian for 15 years. I am a 60-yr-old PV, significantly underweight male; in good health and strong agni. Would it be beneficial to begin introducing meat into my diet now? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 10, 2007 Report Share Posted May 10, 2007 ayurveda , " zjohnallan " <zjohnallan wrote: >I am a 60-yr-old PV, significantly > underweight male; in good health and strong agni. Would it be > beneficial to begin introducing meat into my diet now? Why would it ever be necessary to eat meat? There are millions of vegetarians moving about the planet every day and do not eat any meat. I have traveled from one end of the earth to the other and NEVER ate any meat. I am not sure what the problem is, but do not worry you will do fine eating vegetarian only. You can call the airline you will travel on and they will prepare a vegetarian meal in possibly several varieties, Indian, Chinese, Western Veg, etc. This is not a problem no need to be anxious. Picking and choosing from what is avalaible is the way everyone eats, why not you too. Liz Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 10, 2007 Report Share Posted May 10, 2007 A few general comments. I live and travel in the US. Being a 99.99% vegan, I feast heartily on fruits and vegetables. When dining in others' homes, I make my needs known to my hosts in advance. Eating in restaurants such as Subway, pizza parlors, upscale eateries: I order salads, vegan or vegetarian sandwiches and dishes. Please visit: http://www.pcrm.org Jai Maharaj, Jyotishi Om Shanti zjohnallan <zjohnallan wrote: > have been vegetarian for 15 years. I am a > 60-yr-old PV, significantly > underweight male; in good health and strong > agni. Would it be > beneficial to begin introducing meat into my > diet now? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 10, 2007 Report Share Posted May 10, 2007 Why would you want to start eating meat? Your strong agni and good health may be due to your vegetarian diet! Meat is very difficult to digest and now adays can be full of chemicals and hormones! > zjohnallan <zjohnallan wrote: > > have been vegetarian for 15 years. I am a > > 60-yr-old PV, significantly > > underweight male; in good health and strong > > agni. Would it be > > beneficial to begin introducing meat into my > > diet now? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 11, 2007 Report Share Posted May 11, 2007 God wants us to be vegan, The real forbidden fruit was not apple, it was meat: http://www.emaxhealth.com/74/11641.html ayurveda , " zjohnallan " <zjohnallan wrote: I am a 60-yr-old PV, significantly > underweight male; in good health and strong agni. Would it be > beneficial to begin introducing meat into my diet now? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 11, 2007 Report Share Posted May 11, 2007 more evidence that vegans apparently suffer from neurological and intellectual deficits if we chose to interpret the bible literally, we we were kicked out of paradise because we took a bite of an apple an apple - not meat - an apple so, does this mean that apples are forbidden? later, in genesis chapter four, god pretty much does a slam dunk on on cain the agriculturalist, indicating HIS chosen preference for the fat of the flock hello? shirish? are you still reading?? further to the point, can someone tell me me WHY we should chose to interpret some parts of the bible as literal and others as allegory? sharpen the agni of your mind! look for the subtle, intelligent argument, instead of the obvious fundamentalist perspective!! those of you who want back to paradise, the most logical suggestion is that you abandon your human comforts and retire to the trees and subsist on leathery raw leaves but if you eat a couple bugs now and then, i promise not to blow your cover todd caldecott On 11-May-07, at 2:54 AM, ayurveda wrote: > Re: Meat Shock > > Posted by: " Shirish Bhate " shirishbhate shirishbhate > > Fri May 11, 2007 2:36 am (PST) > > God wants us to be vegan, The real forbidden fruit was not apple, it > was meat: > http://www.emaxhealth.com/74/11641.html Caldecott todd www.toddcaldecott.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 11, 2007 Report Share Posted May 11, 2007 Didn't even Lord Rama hunt when he was exiled to the forest? Darla Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 11, 2007 Report Share Posted May 11, 2007 I am not abandoning my proclivity for vegetables. This is merely a one-week event where the food is generously provided and it would be in poor taste to reject the " fatted calf. " - Prodigal Son Caldecott <todd more evidence that vegans apparently suffer from neurological and intellectual deficits if we chose to interpret the bible literally, we we were kicked out of paradise because we took a bite of an apple an apple - not meat - an apple so, does this mean that apples are forbidden? <snip> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 12, 2007 Report Share Posted May 12, 2007 May I but in? Meet shock is mere shock but this is a jolt for the spirit. Not a blade of grass moves without His will. If the whole of universe is created by God including animals and birds, they are also children of God, may be of a different species. What right humans have to kill them to eat meat? There are 8.4 million (84 Lakhs as per Indian scriptures now proved by science to be more or less correct) species and each one eats according to its nature. The Donkey will not eat tobacco; nay no animal would graze on tobacco fields. But corrupt minded human start making wrong use making cigarrettes and bidis. Hence eating meat is a real shock. Of course, this is my personal opinion with due respect to others who have a right to their opinions. But opinions don't change the fact. Blind man might feel that an elephant is made of four pillars (legs) yet an elephant is an elephant, whatever one may say. Mere arguments can't change the truth. They might help one to do what one wants to do feeling that to be right. Trees will remain trees, leaves will remain leaves irrespetive of what human beings do to them. With love for all and with malice towards none, S. M. Acharya <smacharya --- Todd Caldecott <todd wrote: > more evidence that vegans apparently suffer from > neurological and > intellectual deficits > if we chose to interpret the bible literally, we we > were kicked out > of paradise because we took a bite of an apple > > an apple - not meat - an apple > so, does this mean that apples are forbidden? <snip> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 12, 2007 Report Share Posted May 12, 2007 A quick note to Todd: You should read the original Hebrew. It was not an apple, but the FRUIT of the tree... Nowhere does it say " apple " If you own a Bible, please take a look at Genesis 3:1 - 7. In King James, NIV, Revised KJ, and the American Standard, they all say " fruit " not apple. Can't tell you about other translations, but these I can absolutely state do not say APPLE. John: As to abandoning your vegetarianism. I am not, nor do I ever plan to be a vegetarian. Yet, I have many friends who are and I certainly take no offence when we dine together that they choose not to eat meat. When we host, I cook their desire and most commonly will eat only what I fix for them, as a courtesy to them. I personally eat about 90% vegetable and 10% protein frankly because I like the taste. It is a taste thing for me and I am not going to give up what I prefer and see no reason you should do that either. I don't see where you have to abandon your principles to appease someone else. Simply make a request to eat vegetarian fare and I am sure you will be accomodated and nobody is going to be offended. Bruce Guilmette, PhD Author: THERE'S MORE TO LIFE THAN JUST LIVING, A Personal Story About Cancer Survival Survive Cancer Foundation, Inc. http://survivecancerfoundation.org <http://survivecancerfoundation.org/> ____ I am not abandoning my proclivity for vegetables. This is merely a one-week event where the food is generously provided and it would be in poor taste to reject the " fatted calf. " - Prodigal Son Caldecott <todd (AT) toddcaldecott (DOT) <todd%40toddcaldecott.com> com> more evidence that vegans apparently suffer from neurological and intellectual deficits if we chose to interpret the bible literally, we we were kicked out of paradise because we took a bite of an apple an apple - not meat - an apple so, does this mean that apples are forbidden? <snip> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 12, 2007 Report Share Posted May 12, 2007 no one will mind if u refuse it because of ur belives or health reasons or they should not mind, if they have common sense and respect for your choises unless u want to eat meat, than ... good luck _________________________ it would be in poor taste to reject the " fatted calf. " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 12, 2007 Report Share Posted May 12, 2007 Unless you have some real curiosity or desire you need not eat something you have not eaten for fifteen years. You must be well aware that people in every country on the globe are vegetarian and how much do you think some one will notice in public if you opt for vegetarian. If we as vegetarians are not offended by those that eat meat why should we even be upset if some one is offended if we choose not to? Though, that would be doubtful unless the person was very narrow minded. If you do choose to eat it then you should eat a lot of ginger - one inch peice in the morning and in travel that might also look odd. A person at the age of sixty should certainly have the inner strength not to worry about pleasing others. If you simply have the desire to eat it then that is different. My in laws came from India for six months to visit Canada and my mother in law brought her own plate to everyon's house because she does not like to eat in dishes that meat has ben in or to eat in dishes that carry other people's vibration. Not even one person was hurt once I explained this to them - and that includes Canadian people where she visited but did not eat a single thing because she knows that all of the pots have been used for preparing meat - in those homes she used to drink juice from a disposable cup or eat some fruit. My husband is a Hindu priest and so we are asked to come to many homes to eat food - I keep certain fasts and so I will always go when people invite me, but if I have a fast I tell them and they understand and even if they don't, I need not break my fast to please a person who does not respect me. for those people I will drink juice. I also do not consume tea or coffee and have never felt obliged to in some one's home. Why should we change our habits that we have taken up due to good health. It simply does not make sense to me. If people are offended by our personal choices they may be too close minded to worry about. If on the other hand it is your desire to eat meat then do so that is your own choice and can not be dictated by another person. If you do, then you can even opt for meat that has been stewed or marinated to make it easier to digest - I would assume you might feel a bit heavy and bloated after not having eaten it for fifteen years and may even experience guilt. If that is the case eat plenty of ginger and sit in vajrasana after eating once you are in a private place and you can also use bhaskara lavanam or hingoli or hingashtak after meals to help with digestion. zjohnallan <zjohnallan wrote: Would it be beneficial to begin introducing meat into my diet now? Any suggestions about herbs/spices (available in the US) that would mitigate this onslaught of animal fat? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 12, 2007 Report Share Posted May 12, 2007 you are right john - the bible is even more vague so i guess we shouldn't eat any fruit, just to be on the safe side mostly, i am just irritated by the thread - what the heck is " meat shock " supposed to mean anyway? the basic issues of diet are clearly discussed in ayurveda, and it has nothing to do with vegetarianism why some people on this list continue to promulgate a false doctrine and call it ayurveda is beyond me you may be a newer member john, but you will see that spreading such nonsense is a kind of compulsion for certain members of the list the list owner has clearly asked that we avoid these sorts of discussions, and yet the worst offender is one of the moderators we have been back and forth over these issues, but as soon as the basic evidence is presented the militant vegetarian/vegan perspective jumps imto the abyss of esotericism by promulgating non-facts i would really prefer not to argue with someone's faith, and last time i checked, proselytization isn't a component of ayurveda in fact, ayurveda is supposed to be for everybody, and meat is not a forbidden food / " fruit " best... todd caldecott On 12-May-07, at 2:32 AM, ayurveda wrote: > Posted by: " Bruce Guilmette, Ph.D. " > bruce drguilmette > > Sat May 12, 2007 1:48 am (PST) > > A quick note to Todd: You should read the original Hebrew. It was > not an > apple, but the FRUIT of the tree... Nowhere does it say " apple " If > you own > a Bible, please take a look at Genesis 3:1 - 7. In King James, NIV, > Revised > KJ, and the American Standard, they all say " fruit " not apple. > Can't tell > you about other translations, but these I can absolutely state do > not say > APPLE. Caldecott todd www.toddcaldecott.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 12, 2007 Report Share Posted May 12, 2007 you ask: " What right humans have to kill them to eat meat " but the question fails to comprehend that eating meat is EXACTLY what made us human ALL of the anthropological evidence derived from tens of thousands of dedicated researchers over the last 200 years has clearly shown that our primate brain evolved only because we ate meat, and in particular, when we became big game hunters even then, if we observe our primate relatives, you will quickly see that none are vegetarian our closest relatives the chimpanzees supplement their fruit and vegetable diet with eggs, insects, and small animals so if you want to be vegetarian fine - but to tell us that its wrong to eat meat and provide no evidence other than your belief isn't a valid argument or something even close to what we might call " truth " - otherwise, how i do i know that your truth is more truthful than the truth claimed by another? yes, its just your opinion, but opinions don't count for much and certainly not if they don't use a measure that we can all agree to and abide by that is the purpose of science, and its also the basis of ayurveda and for ayurveda, the importance of meat in the human diet is NOT a subject of debate just pick up Charaka, Sushruta, and Vaghbata and read them for yourself all the metaphors in the world cannot change this fact best... todd caldecott On 12-May-07, at 2:32 AM, ayurveda wrote: > Re: Meat Shock > > Posted by: " SM Acharya " smacharya smacharya > > Sat May 12, 2007 1:06 am (PST) > > May I but in? Meet shock is mere shock but this is a > jolt for the spirit. Not a blade of grass moves > without His will. If the whole of universe is created > by God including animals and birds, they are also > children of God, may be of a different species. What > right humans have to kill them to eat meat? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 12, 2007 Report Share Posted May 12, 2007 I am not a Christian per se, although I do know the Bible. ( I also understand the Vedas) The Bible is perfectly clear in its demands, and although there are verses in which God instructs certain individuals in particular time and circumstances that eating flesh is " allowed " , I do not know of any sacred scriptures that endorse a meat eating diet for physical or spiritual health. I know for a fact the Vedas strictly forbid the practice, as do many followers of other faiths, sects, and creeds. I also understand that any possible health benefit obtained by eating of flesh may also be obtained by vegetarian diet, without the same risks/consequences. " ..God said unto them....have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth. And God said, Behold, I have given you every herb bearing seed which is upon the face of all the earth, and every tree, in which is the fruit of a tree yielding seed; to you it shall be for meat.' " (Genesis 1: 28,29) Caldecott <todd you are right john - the bible is even more vague so i guess we shouldn't eat any fruit, just to be on the safe side mostly, i am just irritated by the thread - what the heck is " meat shock " supposed to mean anyway? <snip> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 12, 2007 Report Share Posted May 12, 2007 john, i am sorry i didn't respond to your original thread you had a general question about the challenge of eating meat after being veg for several years generally speaking, our capacity to produce stomach acid as we age diminishes, and in addition with a 15 year history of eating no meat this may mean that your immediate capacity to produce sufficient stomach acid to properly denature animal proteins may be affected certainly taking agni-enhancing herbs such as trikatu may help, but better still will be remedies that either enhance or supplement your native acid production, including a tsp of apple cider vinegar before meals and a good full spectrum digestive enzyme with HCl acid with meals you might also consider a bitter remedy before meals, like swedish bitters, to promote sufficient bile synthesis and fat absorption try to eat the meat only with vegetables and not with starchy foods - this will help with digestion as animal proteins and starches digest in chemically opposite mediums in addition, don't eat too much at each meal, just a bit as for the other question about whether or not you should switch back to eating meat, that is difficult to say you mention you are underweight, which in itself isn't bad, but it depends to what degree a little bit under is fine, but as you head into the latter stages of your life, you want to maintain a robust body, which includes maintaining a healthy weight to maintain the body, an optimal balance of all the necessary nutrients is essential with vegans, there is a concern for amino acid, fatty acid, mineral, B12, and fat soluble vitamin deficiencies a well-balanced lacto-ovo vegetarian diet can make up for several of these deficiencies, but additional supplementation may still be required, for example vitamin D3 best... todd caldecott > Posted by: " John " zjohnallan zjohnallan > I am not abandoning my proclivity for vegetables. This is merely a > one-week event where the food is generously provided and it would > be in poor taste to reject the " fatted calf. " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 12, 2007 Report Share Posted May 12, 2007 Ok guys… I have been following this meat thing and I thought I put my two cents in… First of all Ayurveda advocates meat and bone soups only during wasting diseases… but it is like all science in that it is always evolving. Ayurveda is kind of like the bible that if you are going to follow it word for word, we are all going to stay in the dark ages, and we can all follow cows and elephants around and collect their dung… Don't ask me what that means, I really don't know… It would seem to me, that if Ayurveda recommends meat and bone soups during wasting diseases to get well, that it would be ok to eat it to stay well! Genesis 1:26 And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth. There's that bible thing sneaking in again. Bottom line here is that what ever man as no use for becomes extinct. Can you imagine what would become of the cow if man didn't need it? … I have tried to become a vegetarian for years and have finally given up. I have come to the realization that God wants me to eat meat. I still have my canine Teeth which is part of my make up and I get sick when I don't eat it… I am sure that in my personal evolution, in some future life, God will have me give it up, but for now my body requires it. Whether you are a vegetarian or not, the animosity towards the opposite side is harder on you physically than the actual act of eating meat or not…. Noel… ayurveda , Todd Caldecott <todd wrote: > > you are right john - the bible is even more vague <snip> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 13, 2007 Report Share Posted May 13, 2007 Dear Noel, It is again a half truth that - " Ayurveda advocates meat and bone soups only during wasting diseases ... " I would like to bring to your notice and also to all the group members and participants that meats of various animals and birds are described in the general food treatise in Sutra-sthana of main Ayurvedic Samhitas; and not only in the treatment of wasting diseases. The properties of each meat, in particular specificity, is described in great detail in Sutra Sthana.. So Ayurveda accepted the use of meat in daily diet existing in various communities and countries prevalent in those times of documentation of Ayurvedic literature. Befre you comment that - " Ayurveda is kind of like the bible that if you are going to follow it word by word, we are all going to stay in dark ages. " Would you please enlighten all of us on what basis (e.g. your qualification, understanding and experience in Ayurveda matters) you opine with such authority about Ayurveda? As per my understanding, Ayurveda has displayed a fine sense of accomodativeness and progressiveness in its treatment patterns and food directives. What it has been firm and non-compromising (bible-like in your words) is the fundamental principles of natural rules of health and basic causes of diseases which stand true even today. This I am confirming after 17 years of private clinical practice as Ayurvedic Consultant and Honarary Lecturer in Ayurvedic College, with equally good knowledge of modern medicine (allopathy in general terms). I think we should all work together to remove the misunderstandings about Ayurveda. Queries about Ayurveda is ok, but please no half-baked opinions. Dr.D.B.Muzumdar M.D.Ayu-Med < dahpc > - Noel Gilbert Ok guys. I have been following this meat thing and I thought I put my two cents in. First of all Ayurveda advocates meat and bone soups only during wasting diseases. but it is like all science in that it is always evolving.<snip> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 14, 2007 Report Share Posted May 14, 2007 hi. pls excuse me for interfering with your conversation, but pls, don't waste your time fighting on your beliefs and habbits. about meat, maybe in ayurveda books it is not forbidden. but i'm lacto-vegetarian for over 13 years and my only weekness r my kidneyes (i drink diuretic plant extract each day) because all my life until 5 years ago i was not drinking fluids almost at all, except for soupe. they also didn't bother me any more for the last 4 years (since i started drinking over 2 liters per day). on the other hand, my sister, younger than me but eating meat, she is not healthy at all. i'll put her in hospital again in 2 days. i should mention i don't have balanced life: i work 2 jobs, involving stress and responsabilities and talking to too many people; i don't have regulate sleep and food, i eat whatever i can in bus from one place to onother and sleep too little; i don't have regulary yoga practise, i travel many times long distances (i work also in other towns than mine) and i also travel through europe. the only healthy 2 things i do is drinking over 2 liters of fluids each day and lacto vegetarian diet, but i'm proud of my health. on the other hand, my sister's program is more relaxed, she is not trevelling so much, she is enjoying her weekends (when i work), she has a good love-life etc. but she is ill. take your own conclusions. muzumdar <dahpc Dear Noel, It is again a half truth that - " Ayurveda advocates meat and bone soups only during wasting diseases ... " <snip> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 14, 2007 Report Share Posted May 14, 2007 Dear Dr.D.B.Muzumdar… I apologize if my opinions seem to be half- baked to you but I assure you that my opinions are fully cooked… but then again that's what they are is my opinions… You are right that I have not had the schooling you have…Thanks God! Literally! … I live in California and attended the California Collage of Ayurveda for two years, about 10 years ago and haven't stopped studying yet… Ya know I started writing this email about two hours ago and I fully planed on dragging out the Caraka Sammhita and the Astanga Hrdayam and all my other books and pointing out many of the old schooled think, but my wife called me to dinner and we got busy… and I got to thinking that I don't have to defend my self to a guy who has formed a half-baked opinion of someone he doesn't even know…my time is more valuable to me… Oh and your opinion of your self as a man of knowledge of modern medicine (allopathic in general terms) does not impress me either… Noel ayurveda , muzumdar <dahpc wrote: <snip> > Would you please enlighten all of us on what basis (e.g. your qualification, understanding and experience in Ayurveda matters) you opine with such authority about Ayurveda? As per my understanding, Ayurveda has displayed a fine sense of accomodativeness and progressiveness in its treatment patterns and food directives. What it has been firm and non-compromising (bible-like in your words) is the fundamental principles of natural rules of health and basic causes of diseases which stand true even today. This I am confirming after 17 years of private clinical practice as Ayurvedic Consultant and Honarary Lecturer in Ayurvedic College, with equally good knowledge of modern medicine (allopathy in general terms). > > I think we should all work together to remove the misunderstandings about Ayurveda. Queries about Ayurveda is ok, but please no half- baked opinions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 14, 2007 Report Share Posted May 14, 2007 this is evidence of nothing - everyone is different and has different needs furthermore, you don't provide anywhere sufficient detail to accurately compare and analyze your diet nor the multitude of other factors against your sisters also, please note that many on this list would condemn you for eating eggs and so it goes, round and round best... todd caldecott > Re: Meat Shock > > Posted by: " criiii dum " dumicita dumicita > > Sun May 13, 2007 9:31 pm (PST) > > hi. > pls excuse me for interfering with your conversation, but pls, > don't waste your time fighting on your beliefs and habbits. <snip> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 14, 2007 Report Share Posted May 14, 2007 i'm not eating eggs, because i don't like them. but some will condamn me for eating cheese. >< ______________________________ also, please note that many on this list would condemn you for eating eggs and so it goes, round and round Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 14, 2007 Report Share Posted May 14, 2007 > Next month I travel internationally to a weeklong event which will > include consumption of meat and probable food combining challenges. I > have been vegetarian for 15 years. I am a 60-yr-old PV, significantly > underweight male; in good health and strong agni. Would it be > beneficial to begin introducing meat into my diet now? Any suggestions > about herbs/spices (available in the US) that would mitigate this > onslaught of animal fat? First of all I would like to apologize to Muzumdar and the group for getting so defensive… This is usually not my nature… I guess I have been getting to much meat… This is from my food list in the files, and I thought it might be helpful to Zjohnallan since he is significantly underweight… Noel ~~~~~~~MEAT ~~~~~~~ Energetics and general properties There is perhaps nothing more nourishing or strengthening than meat. It is excellent for debility or convalescence and one of the best substances for lowering high Vata. It is sweet slightly warming and sweet in post-digestive effect. It decreases Vata and generally increases Pitta and Kapha. Meat; however is considered Tamasic (creating inert) in nature and there is nothing as potentially deranging as it either. It breeds toxins (Ama), feeds infections, fevers and tumors. It has a dulling effect upon the mind and senses and reduces love and compassion. Its side effects have caused it to be denigrated in the Vedic teachings; creating bad karma. On the other hand it can preserve or save human life. It has been said that the Dalai Lama eats meat, and some of us still have our canine teeth which would insinuate that genetically speaking it would be important to eat meat. From my point of view, eating meat must be a personal choice; weather physical or spiritual. If you are going to eat meat, eat hormone free meat and remember all things in moderation. Animal organs like liver can be strongly nourishing to their respective organs but also tend to produce a low quality tissue and dull the mind. Bones and bone soup can nourish to bone marrow but are also heavy and tend to make the blood toxic. PREPARATION Meat needs to be cooked properly, preferably with spices to make it easier to digest. Raw or not completely cooked it is very aggravating to Ama (toxins) and the blood. Salt is helpful for softening and tenderizing it but M.S.G. has many other side effects. Meat soups and stew are easier to digest. Deep fried meats are more aggravating to the humors (doshas). Canned meats are particularly Tamasic (inert creating) TIME Meat should be avoided in the summer owing to its warm nature. In Kapha time it a can also be difficult. It is also best not to eat it at night. Meat is better in spring and fall and for those who live in high altitudes or northern latitudes. ANTIDOTING The toxic effects of meat can be antidoted somewhat with raw vegetables, leafy greens and vegetable juices; bitter herbs like aloe help, as well as spices. LIST OF MEATS BEEF Ayurveda Beef is sweet and slightly warming. It decreases Vata but increases Pitta and Kapha. It is highly nutritious and builds the blood and muscles. It gives strength and the capacity for work. Too much red meat can cause toxic (Ama) blood; aggravating acne and skin rashes. Chinese Thermal nature: warming. Flavor: Sweet. Properties: Strengthens the spleen, pancreas and stomach, builds the blood, increases Qi energy, and strengthens the sinews and bones. Used in the wasting stage of diabetes: treats insufficient Yin and /or blood manifesting in dryness and emaciation: also used for general weakness, low backache, and weak knees. Contraindications: nephritis and hepatitis. CHICKEN/ TURKEY Chicken is sweet and slightly warming. It decreases Vata but increases Pitta and Kapha. As one of the drier and leaner meats, it is less likely to aggravate Kapha. It is usually the easiest meat to digest, as it is dry, light and less oily than the other. It helps improve absorption and is good for anorexia, debility and convalescence, particularly as a soup. It is mildly aphrodisiac. DUCK Duck is sweet and slightly warming. It decreases Vata but increases Pitta and Kapha. It is heavier, more nutritive but harder to digest than chicken and turkey. LAMB/ MUTTON Lamb is sweet and hot. It decreases Vata but increases Pitta and Kapha. It has aphrodisiac but has irritant properties and promotes sexual activity. It is commonly used in Islamic and Middle Eastern cooking, along with garlic. This is very Pitta irritating and aggravating for the blood. To eat lamb is also not particularly sensitive or Sattvic (pure). PORK Ayurveda Pork is sweet, and a little cooling. It decreases Vata and Pitta but strongly increases Kapha. It is highly Tamasic (inert) and creates dullness and heaviness in the mind and senses, and clogs the channels (Srotas). Bacon is particularly heavy and difficult to digest by its high concentration of fat. Ham has less fat but is still heavy. Pork nourishes the liver and increases fat tissue more so than any of the meats. Pork has to be well cooked as it is a carrier of parasites. Chinese Thermal nature: neutral. Flavor: sweet and salty. Properties: Specifically affects the kidneys, spleen, pancreas, and stomach: moistens dryness and nurtures the Yin. Used to treat those with thin, dry, nervous, and nurtures the Yin. Used to treat those with constipation and the wasting stage of diabetes. Defatted soup of pork is drunk for dry cough and constipation. Contraindications obesity, diarrhea hypertension conditions of yellow mucus (mucus with a heat condition), of stagnant Qi energy … The latter often resulting in conditions such as tiredness, stress, pin, spasm, of paralysis. VENISON Venison is sweet and warm. It decreases Vata but increases Pitta and Kapha. It is very nutritive and aphrodisiac. It strengthens the kidneys and bones and promotes fertility. It is good for poor growth or retardation in children. ~~~~FISH~~~~ Energetics and general properties Fish is sweet and salty in taste, slightly warming; it also decreases Vata but increases Pitta and Kapha. It is lighter than most meats, and not quite as dulling or as grounding to the system. Fish builds the plasma. It is tonic, rejuvenate and laxative. Yet it can cause diarrhea or nausea; fish contains oils that counter Vata, nourish the liver, skin, and eyes, strengthens the heart and reduces cholesterol and arteriosclerosis. PREPARATION Care must be taken that the fish is fresh, as it spoils easily. Canned and salted it is more likely to aggravate the humors (doshas) or cause Ama (toxins). It is better steamed or baked than fried. COMBINATION Fish can be difficult to combine. It does not do well with milk or sugars. Nor does it combine well with other meat. ANTIDOTING Fish can be antidoted with spices like mustard, horseradish, ginger, garlic or perilla (shisho). Sour sauces tend to make it more aggravating to pitta and the blood and may cause diarrhea. LIST OF FISH OCEAN FISH Ocean fish is generally sweet, salty, and slightly warm. It decreases Vata but increases Pitta and Kapha. It is much like fish in generally. FRESH WATER FISH Fresh water fish is less salty and so better for Pitta and Kapha. Trout is often one of the easiest fish to digest. SHELL FISH Generally Ayurveda does not use shellfish because as a scavenger it is thought to be particularly Tamasic (inert creating) in nature. Yet by this fact it also often has aphrodisiac properties. CRAB Crab is sweet and warm. It decreases Vata but increases Pitta and Kapha. It is aphrodisiac and strengthens the kidneys and is good for impotence. OYSTER Oyster is regarded as an aphrodisiac and also increases the reproductive tissue (Semen or Shukra). It is particularly Kapha aggravating. SHRIMP Shrimp is sweet, and warm. It is regarded as am aphrodisiac and also strengthen the kidneys, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 15, 2007 Report Share Posted May 15, 2007 Noel Gilbert <noel_glbrt wrote: > . . . > There is perhaps nothing more nourishing or > strengthening than meat. . . . " A vegetarian diet can prevent 97 percent of our coronary occlusions. " - " Diet and Stress in Vascular Disease, " Journal of The American Medical Association, Vol. 176, No. 9, June 3, 1961, page 806. Jai Maharaj, Jyotishi Om Shanti Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.