Guest guest Posted May 15, 2007 Report Share Posted May 15, 2007 In the natural scheme of things there are naturally at times more male children born - possibly by the spiritual controller of nature on this planet to accommodate wars so that the status quo remains stable when the young male population is slaughtered - sounds graphic but this is what happens. As far as strong women are concerned - the male female ratio is not affected by this show of strength, the ratio and the spiritual side of things stays the same. There are epochs where women are more dominant and then the cycle swings back the other way and men are more dominant - just part of the evolutionary cycles we live with on this planet The fine tuning of the planet's duality don't you think? But to artificially reduce the female population as in China and other Eastern countries, by culling the female foetus causes a natural increase in the potential for war as the planet strives to keep the balance stable. This is how it appears to me. Jane - Sunil Bhattacharjya Monday, May 14, 2007 2:19 AM Re: [HealthyIndia] Male & female Also please consider the greater danger that lies ahead if the number of males is reduced. Did not Arjuna apprehend such a situation when the warriors die (as given in the first chapter of the Bhagavad Gita)?SKBJane MacRoss <highfield1 wrote: Regardless of gender engineering, when in the natural course of events there is a slight predominance f male infants then there is likely to be war at the end of it. That is a commonly accepted outcome in the larger scheme of things Jane Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 15, 2007 Report Share Posted May 15, 2007 Jane MacRoss <highfield1 wrote: > . . . > But to artificially reduce the female population > as in China and other Eastern countries, by > culling the female foetus causes a natural > increase in the potential for war as the planet > strives to keep the balance stable. > This is how it appears to me. Jane I agree with that sentiment. But from a philosophical point of view, are the Chinese also not part of nature, and thus whatever they do also natural? Going further along this line of thinking, is there anything really artificial? Jai Maharaj, Jyotishi Om Shanti ______________________________\ ____Looking for a deal? Find great prices on flights and hotels with FareChase. http://farechase./ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 15, 2007 Report Share Posted May 15, 2007 Any human interference in the natural process or product inbound to react and the repercussion will be devastating for the human race.For evidence, the impending catastrophe awaiting the world due to climate change.The reaction of the nature is a very slow process and the damage is visible or felt a few generation after.Imagine the fate of human if death is conquered. On 5/15/07, Jane MacRoss <highfield1 wrote: In the natural scheme of things there are naturally at times more male children born - possibly by the spiritual controller of nature on this planet to accommodate wars so that the status quo remains stable when the young male population is slaughtered - sounds graphic but this is what happens. As far as strong women are concerned - the male female ratio is not affected by this show of strength, the ratio and the spiritual side of things stays the same. There are epochs where women are more dominant and then the cycle swings back the other way and men are more dominant - just part of the evolutionary cycles we live with on this planet The fine tuning of the planet's duality don't you think? But to artificially reduce the female population as in China and other Eastern countries, by culling the female foetus causes a natural increase in the potential for war as the planet strives to keep the balance stable. This is how it appears to me. Jane - Sunil Bhattacharjya Monday, May 14, 2007 2:19 AM Re: [HealthyIndia] Male & female Also please consider the greater danger that lies ahead if the number of males is reduced. Did not Arjuna apprehend such a situation when the warriors die (as given in the first chapter of the Bhagavad Gita)?SKBJane MacRoss <highfield1 wrote: Regardless of gender engineering, when in the natural course of events there is a slight predominance f male infants then there is likely to be war at the end of it. That is a commonly accepted outcome in the larger scheme of things Jane Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 15, 2007 Report Share Posted May 15, 2007 Not being a philosopher I would choose to be guided by Our Ten Commandments which include " Thou shalt not Kill " so killing foetuses/foetae - to me - is not a " natural " action, it goes against nature - against the natural balance of things. Do the Hindu religions and the Philosopher have similar guidelines to healthy living? ( I have not studied the Hindu Religion nor " Philosophy " sufficiently to know if they have a similar list of guidelines ) Best, Jane " Jyotishi " > > I agree with that sentiment. But from a > philosophical point of view, are the Chinese also > not part of nature, and thus whatever they do also > natural? Going further along this line of > thinking, is there anything really artificial? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 15, 2007 Report Share Posted May 15, 2007 Yes. The killing of the foetus is called 'Bhruna hatya'. This is a great sin in Hinduism and the expiation of that sin is not easy.As regards the "Male & female balancing" act there were, in some societies, the practice of polyandry when the male population exceeded the female population and of polygamy when the female population exceeded the male population. In some societies these practices probably still persist. These processes too seem to have evolved naturally due to the prevailing circumstances and became socially acceptable norms in those societies.Regards,Jane MacRoss <highfield1 wrote: Not being a philosopher I would choose to be guided by Our Ten Commandments which include "Thou shalt not Kill" so killing foetuses/foetae - to me - is not a "natural" action, it goes against nature - against the natural balance of things. Do the Hindu religions and the Philosopher have similar guidelines to healthy living? ( I have not studied the Hindu Religion nor "Philosophy" sufficiently to know if they have a similar list of guidelines ) Best, Jane "Jyotishi" > > I agree with that sentiment. But from a > philosophical point of view, are the Chinese also > not part of nature, and thus whatever they do also > natural? Going further along this line of > thinking, is there anything really artificial? Boardwalk for $500? In 2007? Ha! Play Monopoly Here and Now (it's updated for today's economy) at Games. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.