Guest guest Posted February 10, 2007 Report Share Posted February 10, 2007 Although this is a marine biology study I found there was information related to human toxicity. Being concerned with the effects of mercury co tent in vaccines, I felt it was relative to my understanding and concerns. Others that share the same concern may find this study informative. http://www.mdpi.org/ijerph/papers/ijerph2006030005.pdf Mercury-Induced Externalization of Phosphatidylserine and Caspase 3 Activation in Human Liver Carcinoma (HepG2) Cells Dwayne J. Sutton1 and Paul B. Tchounwou1* 1Molecular Toxicology Research laboratory, NIH-Center for Environmental Health, College of Science, Engineering and Technology, Jackson State University, 1400 Lynch Street, Box 18540 Jackson, Mississippi 39217, USA *Correspondence to Dr. Paul B. Tchounwou. Email: paul.b.tchounwou Received: 20 October 2005 / Accepted: 24 March 2006 / Published: 31 March 2006 Abstract: Apoptosis arises from the active initiation and propagation of a series of highly orchestrated specific biochemical events leading to the demise of the cell. It is a normal physiological process, which occurs during embryonic development as well as in the maintenance of tissue homeostasis. Diverse groups of molecules are involved in the apoptosis pathway and it functions as a mechanism to eliminate unwanted or irreparably damaged cells. However, inappropriate induction of apoptosis by environmental agents has broad ranging pathologic implications and has been associated with several diseases including cancer. The toxicity of several heavy metals such as mercury has been attributed to their high affinity to sulfhydryl groups of proteins and enzymes, and their ability to disrupt cell cycle progression and/or apoptosis in various tissues. The aim of this study was to assess the potential for mercury to induce early and late-stage apoptosis in human liver carcinoma (HepG2) cells. The Annexin-V and Caspase 3 assays were performed by flow cytometric analysis to determine the extent of phosphatidylserine externalization and Caspase 3 activation in mercury-treated HepG2 cells. Cells were exposed to mercury for 10 and 48 hours respectively at doses of 0, 1, 2, and 3 ¦Ìg/mL based on previous cytotoxicity results in our laboratory indicating an LD50 of 3.5 ¡À 0.6 ¦Ìg/mL for mercury in HepG2 cells. The study data indicated a dose response relationship between mercury exposure and the degree of early and late-stage apoptosis in HepG2 cells. The percentages of cells undergoing early apoptosis were 0.03 ¡À 0.03%, 5.19 ¡À 0.04%, 6.36 ¡À 0.04%, and 8.84 ¡À 0.02% for 0, 1, 2, and 3 ¦Ìg/mL of mercury respectively, indicating a gradual increase in apoptotic cells with increasing doses of mercury. The percentages of Caspase 3 positive cells undergoing late apoptosis were 3.58 ¡À 0.03%, 17.06 ¡À 0.05%, 23.32 ¡À 0.03%, and 34.51 ¡À 0.01% for 0, 1, 2, and 3 ¦Ìg/mL of mercury respectively, also indicating a gradual increase in Caspase positive cells with increasing doses of mercury. Keywords: Mercury, Apoptosis, Flow cytometry, HepG2 cells, Caspase 3, Annexin V Below are just a few of the other references sited in this study that I identified as related to my mercury exposure and vaccine concerns. To view the full study and complete list of references you must open the link provided above. Sweet, L. I.; Zelikoff, J. F.: Toxicology and immunotoxicology of mercury: a review in fish and humans. J. Toxicol Environ. Health B Crit. Rev., 2001, 2, 161 ¨C 205. Clarkson, T. W.; Magos, L.; Myers, G. J.: The toxicology of mercury ¨C current exposures and clinical manifestations. N Engl J Med. 2003, 349, 1731 ¨C 1737 Clarkson, T. W.: The three modern faces of mercury. Environ Health Perspect Suppl.Suppl.1, 2002, 10, 11 ¨C 23. Steuerwald, U.; Weibe, P.; Jorgensen, P.; Bjerve, K.; Brock, J.; Heinzow, B.; Budta-Jorgensen, E.; Grandjean, P.: Maternal seafood diet, Methylmercury exposure and neonatal neurologic function. J. Pediatr., 2000, 5, 599 ¨C 605 Baskin, D. S.; Nago, H.; Didenko, V.: Thimerol induces DNA breaks, caspase 3 activation, membrane damage, and cell death in cultured human neurons and fibroblasts. Toxicological Sciences, 2003, 74, 361 ¨C 368. U.S. EPA. Mercury study report to congress volume I. Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards and Office of Research and Development, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1997 Diamond, G. L.; Zalups, R. K.: Understanding renal toxicity of heavy metals. Toxicol.Pathol., 1998, 26, 92 ¨C 103. Nielsen, J. B.; Hultman, P.; Mercury-induced autoimmunity in mice. Environ.Health Perspect. Suppl. 5, 2002, 110: 877 ¨C 881. Sweet, L. I.; Zelikoff, J. F.: Toxicology and immunotoxicology of mercury: a review in fish and humans. J. Toxicol Environ. Health B Crit. Rev., 2001, 2, 161 ¨C 205. Weed, R.; Eber, J.; Rothstein, A.: Interaction of mercury with human erythrocytes. Journal of General Physiology, 1962, 45, 395 ¨C 410. Comparison of neurobehavioral changes I three inbred strain of mice prenatally exposed to methylmercury. Neurotoxicology and Teratology, 2000, 22, 397 ¨C 403. Graff, R. D.; Falconer, M. M.; Brown, D. L.; Reuhl, K. R.: Altered sensitivity of posttranslationally modified microtubules to Methylmercury in differentiating embryonal carcinoma-derived neurons. Toxicol Appl. Pharmacol., 1997, 2, 215-224. Mary -- In Love, Light and Honor.............. May You and Yours be Blessed with Health, Happiness, Wisdom and Prosperity. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.