Fw: German court rules HIV not proven to cause AIDS

[Guest guest]



 

Heather of World Vision India, whose vision is clouded

and Brinelle Desouza of TISS : This is in continuation of

my reply dated 26 Oct. to Heather's email of 24 Oct referring

to my earlier comment on Brinelle's manipulations at

AIDS NGOs meeting held at TISS on 22nd Sept.

 

Now that the German High Court has finally nailed the HIV = AIDS lie,

and I have once proved right, what will you parasites do for your living?

 

Shame on you "professional" social workers who jump from one job to another for a few rupees raise in salaries or who go conference hopping parroting the same old lies ad nauseam.

 

Best wishes for your sanity

Dr. Leo Rebello

President, AIDS Alternativa

 

 

 

German court rules HIV not proven to cause "AIDS" Posted by Editor on June 28, 2003 at 13:51:22:from indymedia.org:http://dc.indymedia.org/front.php3?article_id=74105 & After years of claims by the AIDS establishment that a link between HIV and immune supression had been established a High Court found the claim without merit and a unfounded deception. This is the first legal trail of the HIV/AIDS hypothesis and a historic defeat for AID$ Inc.

--------

-------Thank you for your leadership.Wed, 25 Jun 2003 17:32:06 -0700 andrew maniotiswalshDear Senator Walsh,Thanks for your vote to help stop the continuation of acts of killing and manslaughter in our state with your vote against mandatory "HIV" testing of pregnant women. But still, Germany is way ahead of us. (See below). With appreciation,Andrew Maniotis, Ph.D.Program Director in the Cell and Developmental Biology of Cancer, 3370 Molecular Biology Research Building,Department of Pathology, Anatomy and Cell Biology, and Bioengineering, 1819 West Polk Street, Room 446, (MC 847)University of Illinois at ChicagoChicago, IL 60612Email: amanioti Office: 312-996-4838Home: 708-749-1819Fax: 312/996-7586 HIV=AIDS found ILLEGAL in Germanyhttp://dc.indymedia.org/front.php3?article_id=74105 & group=webcast by Repost 1:23am Tue Jun 24 '03 (Modified on 4:48am Tue Jun 24 '03) After years of claims by the AIDS establishment that a link between HIV and immune supression had been established, a High Court found the claim without merit and a unfounded deception. This is the first legal trail of the HIV/AIDS hypothesis and a historic defeat for AID$ Inc. http://www.la.indymedia.org/news/2003/06/66369.phpThe Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, Mary Robinson The United Nations Centre for Human Rights, United Nations Office at Geneva 8-14 Avenue de la Paix1211 Geneva 10, SwitzerlandTo all Heads of Government and all Heads of StateTo all NGOsLegal proceedings against the "Deutscher Bundestag", the Parliament of the Federal Republic of Germany: Because of the intentional continuation of acts of killing and manslaughter (§ 220a StGB Germany) by the German Parliament. During the last six years proofs have been collected for the following actions that have taken place inside Germany: The State intentionally is using non-valid tests to persuade healthy persons to take a deadly long-term medication. The persons, being healthy before being tested die during the long-term-medication. The German Parliament, since years intentionally is securing that this crime continues. Course of Events on January 15th 2001 at the District Court (Landgericht) of Dortmund:Judge Hackmann announced the statement of the "BundesgesundheitsbehˆÂrde", the Federal German Health Authorities, which says that in connection with AIDS there has never been isolated a virus (Dr. Marcus, Robert-Koch-Institute (RKI) Berlin). The judge figured out that the German Bundestag had been backing the lie of the Federal Health Authorities (RKI, Dr. Marcus, 9.3.95) about a successful isolation of a virus in connection with AIDS in the course of a petition (Art. 17, Constitution of the Federal Republic of Germany, Pet. 5-13-15-2002-010526).The trial was based on actions of the defendant which were caused by the misleading statement made by the RKI (Dr. Marcus) on the 9th March 1995, that there were photographs of the isolated HIV-virus inside the publications of Montagnier (1983) and Gallo (1984). The judge proved the untruthfulness of this statement using Dr. Marcus's statement itself. The court imposed a suspended sentence of 8 months of jail because of attempted coercion of the authorities to adhere and act according to law and order. The document of the German Bundestag DS 12/8591 holds proof that the Bundestag had already known in 1994 that neither Montagnier (1983) nor Gallo (1984) had isolated any virus in connection with AIDS. Based on this the Bundestag safeguarded the persistent lie of the AIDS information campaign (RKI) from 9th March 1995 about the successful isolation of a virus in connection with AIDS. As a consequence of non-tolerating this lie and because of non-tolerating the deadly consequences of this lie, the trial took place on 15th January 2001. It is impossible' as far as laboratory conditions are concerned ' to develop a valid Virus-antibody-test, if the virus has not been isolated before. Every layman understands that an individual proof for an infection with a virus is impossible, if the existence of the virus has never been generally proven. This knowledge of the German health authorities, that the tests are not validated, can be proven via the authorities' or with the documents themselves. The error concerning the test validity is spread and supported by the authorities' against better knowledge. With two more petitions the Bundestag safeguarded the default of the responsible authorities, not to carry out the law (§63 AMG, Stufenplan II), to do studies and observations to protect persons taking the AIDS-Medicine, the chemotherapy AZT (Pet. 5-13-15-2002-058744 and Pet. 5-13-15-212-023567a). The health authorities and the Bundestag know that there will be no test method to prove an HIV-Infection, as long as HIV has not been isolated. And there is no doubt that AZT 'as well as the HIV-medications in general ' are deadly themselves when used as long-term-medication. In the course of the proceedings of the petitions the Bundestag created an apparent piece of law ' by means of deliberately untruthful statements. President of the German Parliament Wolfgang Thierse regards untruthful behaviour of this kind (as shown by the Bundestag) as being justified by the Bundesverfassungsgericht (Federal Constitutional Court). A videotape documenting an interview (28th June 1995) shows that his predecessor in office, Prof. Rita Smuth did know, that there had never been any proofs for a virus in connection with AIDS and that there are no proofs for the claims of infectivitiy. Still pending in the Bundestag is the petition Pet. 2-14-15-212-02608. It is lodging a complaint against the legal authorities, which stayed passive after getting the attention of the proofs for these act of killings. Enclosed with the complaint were so many proofs, which had made it necessary for the Bundestag to take actions right after perusal, to stop the continuation of these acts of killing by the state. Within the last six months every single member of the German Bundestag was informed six times via mail about these acts of killing by the state. The intention of the German Bundestag to safeguard killings by the state after gaining insight into the facts must be regarded as proven, especially because of the fact that several petitions were rejected by means of untruthful statements. The German Bundestag and every individual member of the Bundestag intentionally safeguards acts of killing by the state by deliberately misleading the public. Healthy people are intentionally lead into a deadly medication via tests with invalid results - and then die. The criminal law of the BRD and especially § 220a StGB (Genocide) protects citizens from act of killings organised by a state which is deliberately misleading the public. It also protects the citizens binding the legal authorities to take actions after perusal. The prosecuting attorneys attended the trial on 15th January 2001 at the Landgericht Dortmund and learned about the facts in front of the public. Their passivity afterwards serves as a further proof for their further intention in this matter. (LG Dortmund, Ns 70 Js 878/99 14(XVII) K 11/00) Karl Krafeld and Dr. Stefan Lanka, Dortmund and Stuttgart, 14.3.2001 Science, Medicine and Human Rights (Wissenschaft, Medizin und Menschenrechte e.V.), Germany Albrechtstr. 17, D-44137 Dortmund, 0711 2220601, Lankahttp://www.virusmyth.net/aids/index/epapadopoulos.htmor http://www.virusmyth.net/aids/index.htmor the forumhttp://www.aidsRC.orgwww.la.indymedia.org/news/2003/06/66369