Do Viruses Exist?

[Guest guest]

Posted by: "Sheri Nakken" Wed Sep 27, 2006 4:37 am (PST) http://www.neue- medizin.com/ lanka2.htmGO TO WEBSITE FOR PHOTOS (or non-photos ) (and Stefan is gorgeous!)Dr. Stefan Lanka Exposes The "Viral Fraud" Pictures of "Isolated Viruses" DebunkedDr. Stefan Lanka, virologist and molecular biologist, is internationallymostly known as an "AIDS dissident" (and maybe "gentechnology dissident")who has been questioning the very existence of "HIV" since 1994. In thepast years, however, he stumbled over a breathtaking fact: Not even ONE ofthe (medically relevant) viruses has ever been isolated; there is no proofof their existence. Actually, Dr. Lanka has already stated

three years ago,in the almost "legendary" Zenger´s interview: "So for a long time I studiedvirology, from the end to the beginning, from the beginning to the end, tobe absolutely sure that there was no such thing as HIV. And it was easy forme to be sure about this because I realized that the whole group of virusesto which HIV is said to belong, the retroviruses -- as well as otherviruses which are claimed to be very dangerous -- in fact do not exist atall." So he was thoroughly reading the literature on those "other viruses"again, and after he could still not find any paper which would provide theevidence, he encouraged people not to BELIEVE him but to ask the institutesand authorities themselves. This has actually taken place, mostly initiatedby mothers. The responses were revealing. In September 2001 the German book"Impfen - Völkermord im dritten Jahrtausend? " (Vaccination - Genocide inthe third millennium?) by Stefan

Lanka and Karl Krafeld was published inwhich they state that there is still no proof of any (medically relevant)virus. This movement (klein-klein- aktion ~ many little actions/steps) has a Germanwebsite: www.klein-klein- aktion.de which I have taken (and translated) allthe following texts from.For almost one year we have been asking authorities, politicians andmedical institutes after the scientific evidence for the existence of suchviruses that are said to cause disease and therefore require"immunization" . After almost one year we have not received even oneconcrete answer which provides evidence for the existence of those"vaccination viruses". The conclusion is inevitable that our children arestill vaccinated on the basis of scientific standards of the 18th and 19thcentury. In the 19th century Robert Koch demanded in his generally acceptedpostulates evidence of the virus in order to prove infection; at

Koch´stime this evidence couldn´t be achieved directly by visualization andcharacterization of the viruses, because adequate technology wasn´tavailable at that time. Methods of modern medicine have profoundly changedover the past 60 years, in particular by the invention of the electronmicroscope. And still all these viruses we get immunized against have neverbeen re-examined using this technology? Several images and explanations that we were pointed to and that were saidto show resp. describe (characterize) viruses, we showed to Dr. Lanka whogives his summarizing comments: [The German original of the following text by Stefan Lanka you can findhere (temporarily not available for technical reasons, Jan 11, 2003)] All these photos have in common that they, resp. the authors, can´t claimthat they present a virus, as long as they do not also provide the originalpublications which describe how and what from the virus

has been isolated.Such original publications are cited nowhere.Indeed, in the entire scientific literature there´s not even onepublication, where for "viruses in the medicine" the fulfillment of Koch´sfirst postulate is even claimed. That means, that there is no proof thatfrom humans with certain diseases the viruses - which are held responsiblefor these diseases - have been isolated. Nevertheless, this is preciselywhat they publicly claim. Now, regarding the photos submitted:1. Many of the photos are colored. This is proof enough, that they are the(art)work of designers, because electron microscopic photos always appearin black and white.2. The images of the so called HIV-, measles (Masern)- and smallpox(Pocken) viruses clearly show, as the image descriptions partly alreadyindicate, that these are cells wherein the viruses can allegedly be found.Thus, nothing has been isolated. The photos actually show cells

and typicalendogenous particles in them. These structures are well known and serve theintra- and intercellular transport. Unlike viruses of the same kind - thatare always the same size and same shape (consistency) -, they differ insize and shape (consistency) and therefore can´t be isolated. 3. In the case of the influenza- herpes-, vaccinia-, polio-, adeno- andebola-viruses each photo shows only a single particle; nobody claims thatthey´re isolated particles, let alone particles that have been isolatedfrom humans. These particles are partially the cellular particles mentioned above (#2)resp. typical artifacts which means: structures that accrue afterinappropriate fixing and drying of the probes, while being prepared for theelectron microscope. 4. The "isolated" polio viruses are artificial particles, generated bysuction of an indifferent mass through a very fine filter into a vacuum.Its structure (no

characteristic structures) differ clearly from the onesof the "viruses" in the cells. Here the information is essential that abiochemical characterization of those "isolated" viruses, although"isolation" is claimed, has never been published anywhere nor has anybodyeven claimed such a characterization. 5. The photo with the hepatitis B "viruses" does not show isolatedstructures, but - as the image title already says, an agglutinate. This isthe scientific/medical term for proteins from the blood that are clumpedtogether, as is typical for coagulations. Typically, thereby round and alsocrystal structures accrue - depending on the condition of the blood sample. In summary, it must be said that these photos are an attempt of fraudcommitted by the researchers and medical scientists involved, as far asthey assert that these structures are viruses or even isolated viruses. Towhat extent the involved journalists and

authors of textbooks havecontributed to this fraud knowlingly or only out of gross negligence, Idon´t know. Everyone who starts a recherche in the medical literature, willquickly encounter statements and references that Koch´s first postulatecan´t be fulfilled (i.e. Großgebauer: Eine kurze Geschichte der Mikroben,1997 ["a little story of the microbes"]; editor: Verlag für angewandteWissenschaft) . How these authors who claim the existence of viruses couldoverlook that, remains a riddle. Could it be that the term "Contagium" = "Gift" (poison/toxin) = "Virus"from the 18th and 19th century was applied in the 20th century to the cellcomponents which were named "viruses" since the electron microscope wasintroduced in 1931? And in order to hide this, the "disease causingviruses" have often been described but never been isolated? And then theywere used as seemingly logical explanation for poisonings and adverseaffects of

vaccination, as Luhmann (1995) (i.e.) writes about thesymptomatic of Hepatitis B, which was observed for the first time in 1985following smallpox vaccinations, and 1938 following measles vaccinations?The copies in the textbooks show only structures within cells and nothingthat looks like isolation and thus homogenous. The biochemicalcharacterization, which is crucial, lacks completely. Robert Koch and colleagues, Prof. Rush, Prof. Max von Pettenkofer, Prof.Virchow have shown, for instance by experiments and by observation of theHenle-Koch´s rules that by transmission of bacteria, the supposed contagiumvivum, it was not possible to cause the same disease. So Robert Kochmodified (weakened) the 3rd postulate of his teacher, the German anatomistHenle, in the form that the generation of a similar symptom in animalexperiments would be sufficient to prove this hypothesis of disease cause,namely the hypothesis of infectious

bacteria. (See Großgebauer: Eine kurzeGeschichte der Mikroben).So it does not surprise me that Prof. Alfred Fischer writes in his book"Vorlesungen über Bakterien" ("[academic] lectures on bacteria") from 1897(!): "as is true for any infectious disease - the fact that it does notonly take the addition of the bacteria but also the unknown something ofindividual predisposition, goes without saying." Stefan Lanka, Dec 2001(Translation Juergen Faas, Dec 2001) (minor changes on March 2, 2002) ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------Sheri Nakken, R.N., MA, Hahnemannian Homeopath Vaccination Information & Choice Network, Nevada City CA & Wales UK "Our ideal is not the spirituality that withdraws from life but the conquest of life by the power of the spirit." -

Aurobindo.

Get on board. You're invited to try the new Mail.