Guest guest Posted August 21, 2006 Report Share Posted August 21, 2006 Dear Dr. V N Sharma This should be always a decision of an individual as to how much bondage he/she can accept as a ‘security’. Security from terrorist will soon make our houses much worse than the prisons. Life of prime minister in 7 race course is not very different than (a 5 star) Tihar jail if seen purely from a security perspective. Similarly, taking too much security also from diseases will deprive our lives of any freedom to eat, and live and experiment. Every individual should have his/her own line drawn between security and freedom. He/she should have right to disown the governments and its laws or minimize its obligation to individual. The view that regulations of governments should just be guidance is correct. The government in present state of enlightenment should play a non intrusive role in life of individuals, and be available on demand. People under the security of laws, regulations and military, can neither be saved from terror nor diseases, but our freedom will get perished. Government is RAKCHHAS (in Sanskrit, security agency) and laws (third party justice administration) and military (legal criminals) are its two arms. I believe that governments in countries like India should follow a gentle approach. Government should allow people to produce and sell products and services of two types viz., first, NOT APPROVED BY THE GOVERNMENT’ and two APPROVED BY THE GOVERNMENT. For APPROVED BY THE GOVERNMENT products, it is obligation of government to accept all liability of consumer on behalf of the supplier, and those suppliers are protected by the government against risk or loss to consumers by them complying with government regulation. Ability of government in making a regulation will then be a matter of its test of true knowledge. These will not be just a matter of drama in parliament. Similarly, NOT APPROVED BY THE GOVERNMENT is subject to ‘free market’ and anything of this category is brought at risk of the consumer and the consumer taking his/her risk can take insurance cover for its loss, cost of treatment and consequences. Suppliers will be then subjected to force of the market and not act under fear of the government and if they have to survive and grow, they must be careful to supply safe products at their own free will. This is a principle that will sort out individuals’ choice between security and freedom. We should know that basic question in our constitution. We live in a country that is also a republic. A country is ‘father’ and nation is ‘father in law’. Anywhere when dealing with aliens, laws or procedures are invented to have a common understanding. A third party justice prescribes laws/ procedures, and this society of aliens has no choice except operating with laws. Love is pure and natural and is without laws, but when this love is treated by a procedure (laws) of ‘marriage’, father in law’ is produced. A father is product of ‘love’ always natural; and ‘father in law’ is product of laws (marriage procedures). When marriage is broken, ‘father in law’ looses identity but father always remains. India is a multi national country. Unfortunately, there is no rule of law but rules of the governments. Existence of governments is opposite of the purpose of laws. When there is good laws, governments are not necessary, and a country is synonymous with a nation. When any one can be government, and people fear with these third parties, voice of citizens is lost. India is a country where nation is failed. In the republic where laws become hostage of government, individuals must be self restraining and not adventure too much. Regulation of food, medicines with inadequate knowledge will impair our freedom of inquiry. K G Misra On Behalf Of Dr.V.N. Sharma Sunday, August 20, 2006 2:06 PM To: Re: [HealthyIndia] Re: Vaccine benefit statistics. My feeling is that our health cannot be subject to jurisdiction of a Health Review Committee with limited scope. Therefore, I suggest that you form your own Review Committee consisting of experts from all types of 'paths', get a report prepared on the subject, get it debated in this and other groups and finally submit the Report in the form of Petition Online to the President , PM and floor leaders in Parliament. vns Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 21, 2006 Report Share Posted August 21, 2006 Krishna Gopal ji, I agree with you in full. This is why I will be writing a detailed letter to the government that primary health care using holistic modalities should be taught to every lady in schools and colleges just as domestic science forms a part of the curriculum in many womens colleges. This will not only empower the ladies, who now feel very helpless when their children suffer from acute problems, but also reduce the burden on the health system and save the tax payers money too. I will use your mail as a footnote to that mail if you permit me to. Regards, Jagannath. , " Krishna Gopal Misra " <kg wrote: > > Dear Dr. V N Sharma > This should be always a decision of an individual as to how much bondage > he/she can accept as a 'security'. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.