Guest guest Posted June 12, 2006 Report Share Posted June 12, 2006 Doctor behind MMR scare to face four charges of misconduct over research Monday June 12, 2006 Andrew Wakefield, the doctor behind the scare over a potential link between the MMR jab and autism in children, is to face four charges relating to unprofessional conduct at the General Medical Council, it is reported today. Mr Wakefield, a surgeon who became a gut specialist, could be struck off the medical register and debarred from practising in the UK if the GMC finds him guilty of serious professional misconduct. Following the publication of a research paper in the Lancet by Mr Wakefield and colleagues in February 1998 - which suggested a tentative link between the immunisation at the age of 18 months, a bowel disorder called Crohn's disease, and autism - many parents became anxious over the safety of the measles, mumps and rubella, or MMR, vaccine. At the press conference to launch the paper, Mr Wakefield had parted company with his colleagues to say that, in his opinion, single jabs might be safer than the three-in-one MMR combination. The take-up of MMR slumped and is still low in some parts, especially areas of London. Public health experts have warned that measles outbreaks are possible, in which some children may be damaged and even die. The numbers of cases of mumps has risen. A top-level inquiry commissioned by the Medical Research Council examined Mr Wakefield's findings, and epidemiological studies were commissioned which found that children given the MMR vaccine were no more likely to become autistic than those who were not. The message from the medical establishment consistently said that there was no evidence of a problem with MMR. In 2001 Mr Wakefield left the Royal Free hospital in north London, where he was a consultant, to work in the United States. In 2004 it was alleged that Mr Wakefield had had an undeclared conflict of interest at the time he wrote the Lancet paper: having been paid £55,000 by the Legal Aid Board to assess whether some of the children who featured in his research paper might have a case to sue for vaccine damage. The Lancet retracted part of the article, and the GMC began an investigation. According to the Independent newspaper today, the preliminary charges against Mr Wakefield will be that he published inadequately founded research, failed to obtain ethical committee approval for the work, obtained funding for it improperly, and subjected children to " unnecessary and invasive investigations " . It was reported that GMC lawyers are preparing more detailed charges for publication later this year, and that there will be a public hearing next year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 13, 2006 Report Share Posted June 13, 2006 Instead of felicitating Mr. Andrew Wakefield for speaking the truth and for warning the parents of the possible dangers of MMR jab and autism, he is being penalised. That is how the " rat scientists " gang up against their intelligent and honest colleague who speaks from the gut and disowns their rat science !!! We need some more Wakefields to wake up the morons called the medical doctors and brainless patients ruining the lives of tiny tots with deadly vaccines by pushing the truth under the carpet. Shame.... Shame.... Dr. Leo Rebello - " james white " <kennelled Monday, June 12, 2006 7:28 PM Re: The unholy business of lies. > Doctor behind MMR scare to face four charges of > misconduct over research > Monday June 12, 2006 > Andrew Wakefield, the doctor behind the scare over a > potential link between the MMR jab and autism in > children, is to face four charges relating to > unprofessional conduct at the General Medical Council, > it is reported today. > Mr Wakefield, a surgeon who became a gut specialist, > could be struck off the medical register and debarred > from practising in the UK if the GMC finds him guilty > of serious professional misconduct. > Following the publication of a research paper in the > Lancet by Mr Wakefield and colleagues in February 1998 > - which suggested a tentative link between the > immunisation at the age of 18 months, a bowel disorder > called Crohn's disease, and autism - many parents > became anxious over the safety of the measles, mumps > and rubella, or MMR, vaccine. > At the press conference to launch the paper, Mr > Wakefield had parted company with his colleagues to > say that, in his opinion, single jabs might be safer > than the three-in-one MMR combination. The take-up of > MMR slumped and is still low in some parts, especially > areas of London. Public health experts have warned > that measles outbreaks are possible, in which some > children may be damaged and even die. The numbers of > cases of mumps has risen. A top-level inquiry > commissioned by the Medical Research Council examined > Mr Wakefield's findings, and epidemiological studies > were commissioned which found that children given the > MMR vaccine were no more likely to become autistic > than those who were not. > The message from the medical establishment > consistently said that there was no evidence of a > problem with MMR. In 2001 Mr Wakefield left the Royal > Free hospital in north London, where he was a > consultant, to work in the United States. > In 2004 it was alleged that Mr Wakefield had had an > undeclared conflict of interest at the time he wrote > the Lancet paper: having been paid £55,000 by the > Legal Aid Board to assess whether some of the children > who featured in his research paper might have a case > to sue for vaccine damage. > The Lancet retracted part of the article, and the GMC > began an investigation. > According to the Independent newspaper today, the > preliminary charges against Mr Wakefield will be that > he published inadequately founded research, failed to > obtain ethical committee approval for the work, > obtained funding for it improperly, and subjected > children to " unnecessary and invasive investigations " . > It was reported that GMC lawyers are preparing more > detailed charges for publication later this year, and > that there will be a public hearing next year. > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 14, 2006 Report Share Posted June 14, 2006 According to the Independent newspaper today, the > preliminary charges against Mr Wakefield will be that > he published inadequately founded research, failed to > obtain ethical committee approval for the work, > obtained funding for it improperly, and subjected > children to " unnecessary and invasive investigations " . - If these are the charges they are going to bring against Dr Wakefield then the ENTIRE medical profession has to be barred for life. Because this is happening everyday. Jagannath. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.