Guest guest Posted December 12, 2001 Report Share Posted December 12, 2001 December 2001 Dear Friends, Thanks to you, we are celebrating Rachel's 15th anniversary this month. We started the newsletter in December 1986 to give grass-roots activists reliable, documented information that they could use in fights to protect their neighborhoods and communities. The idea was to translate technical information about environment and health into language that people can understand and use. And people like you have provided generous support to keep Rachel's going. Over the years we have often been the first ones to alert the public to many emerging problems: ** The toxic hazards of incinerator ash April, 27, 1987 (Rachel's #22) ** Environmental racism May 18, 1987 (Rachel's #25) ** The dangers of leaking landfills August 10, 1987 (Rachel's #37) ** Pesticides causing cancer in children August 17, 1987 (Rachel's #38) ** Lax EPA standards for testing genetically engineered crops May 23, 1988 (Rachel's #78) ** Diesel exhaust causes lung cancer May 14, 1989 (Rachel's #120) ** Organic solvents harm the nervous system July 11, 1989 (Rachel's #137) ** Chemicals interfere with hormones in animals and humans Dec. 11, 1991 (Rachel's #263) Over the years, we have also reported on innovative policies that could solve these problems: ** We first advocated a " green tax " on pollution Nov. 7, 1988 (Rachel's #102) ** We first argued that freedom from toxics was a basic human right Nov. 7, 1989 (Rachel's #154) ** In that same issue we first attacked the flawed risk-based approach to environmental protection -- the approach that requires us to " line up the dead bodies " before we can take action to protect the public; ** We first argued that solar/hydrogen should replace oil in our economy Sept. 25, 1991 (Rachel's #252) ** We first advocated looking at " the corporation " as the polluters' base of power Nov. 13, 1991 (Rachel's #259) ** We first described modern environmental protection based on precaution May 6, 1992 (Rachel's #284) Over the years, we have continually reported new information on all of these topics, and much more. And there has been some real progress: ** Everyone now acknowledges that landfills leak and threaten groundwater; ** Everyone knows that incinerators create toxic ash, threatening public health; the incinerator industry is all but defunct (though it is now trying to make a comeback -- so we've got to revisit this problem); ** U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has now said diesel exhaust is a public health hazard that should be controlled; ** Since September 11, many, many people have realized that our dependence on oil poses a serious threat to our national security; ** The " risk-based " approach to environmental protection is still used by our government, but no one any longer believes that it can actually protect the environment or human health -- after all, it was designed by polluters to protect polluters; ** Huge numbers of community-based activists are now advocating a precautionary approach instead of the " you have to line up the dead bodies " risk-based approach. Sooner or later, this new precautionary paradigm will become the norm. ** The general public definitely " gets it " about the dangers of toxic chemicals -- more than half of all Americans now buy bottled water to minimize their exposure to toxicants. (This does not solve the water pollution problem, but it's an indicator of broad concern.) ** Environmental racism is still rampant but at least there's a huge, vocal movement opposing it and the federal government officially opposes it; and ** The United Nations this year declared that a clean environment is a basic human right. The combination of good factual information, plus good ideas for new policies, will eventually change " business as usual " -- but it will take a continual fight at the local level, community by community, decision by decision. If you want to stay on the " cutting edge " of environmental news and policy, please support the publication of the Rachel's newsletter. Our small staff works hard and we appreciate the consistent financial support that you, our readers, have provided us. We hope that you will support us again this year. To help support Rachel's, please fill out the form below or TO MAKE A CONTRIBUTION ONLINE go to http://www.rachel.org and click on the " Donate Now " button in the lower right corner. Yours sincerely, (signed) Peter Montague, Editor ___ Yes! I want to make a tax-deductible contribution to Rachel's. Name: Address: City, State, Zip: E-mail: Phone: Amount: $15.00 $50.00 $75.00 $150.00 Other amount (please specify) _________ Payment Information: I went to http://www.rachel.org and donated through the " Donate Now " button in the lower right corner. I have printed this page and am mailing it with my check. I have printed this page and am mailing / faxing it with my credit card information. Card type: Visa MasterCard AMEX Card Number: Expiration Date: Name on card: Cardholder's signature: SAVE RESOURCES! Please do not send me a thank you note, receipt or other form of acknowledgment unless my donation is more than $250.00. We thank you for your generous support. Please return this form and your contribution to: Rachel's Environment & Health News Environmental Research Foundation P.O. Box 5036, Annapolis, MD 21403-7036. To make a credit card donation, you can fax it to: (410) 263-8944 or call us toll free at: (888) 2Rachel [that is (888) 272-2435] or at (410) 263-1584 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.