Guest guest Posted December 9, 2001 Report Share Posted December 9, 2001 In a message dated 9/12/01 19:09:14 GMT Standard Time, vache920 writes: I would say that Rob is just putting the evidence before us and letting us draw our own conclusions - I for one am glad that I do not have the choice at present - perhaps I will see where else the topic goes and think long and hard before Dr Jon sells to Europe. Marianne > Rob, are you baiting & switching we poor souls upon this List?! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 9, 2001 Report Share Posted December 9, 2001 In a message dated 9/12/01 20:34:09 GMT Standard Time, vache920 writes: I think we all make our own decisions no matter what evidence is put before us, that of course if human nature and why we are so lucky to live in a time where 'freedom of speech' is automatically our right. > What type of balanced conclusion could they then honestly > arrive at? > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 9, 2001 Report Share Posted December 9, 2001 This is a post from another list by Darrell Sandlien, concerning the " Dr. Jon " scandal. " I have followed the well documented allegations made by Mr. Hanson and Ms. Miller with great interest. The evidence is compelling that deceptive practices are involved. I am a retired P.I. and am fascinated by puzzles. The facts I have learned, from public records mostly, are: 1. Dr. Jon Brooks appears to be the pen name of Fred Fason, M.D., who graduated from Baylor Medical School in 1960. Dr. Fason did his residency at U.C.L.A. 2. Stewart Fason is a well known philanthropist in the Palm Beach, FL area. He donated his home, at 115 Via la Selva, Palm Beach to The Jewish Community Day school. It had a mortgage of over 300k so the school only netted about 650k when sold for $1,000,000.00 to a bank president. He gave away almost $200,000.00 in computer equipment to various schools and universities. I spoke with Carol Roberts, a former Mayor of W. Palm Beach. She confirmed that the Fasons presented many concerts in So. Florida, showcasing young artists. They would invite the entire audience to their home for a post concert reception. They were the first to open their mansion to ordinary people. There was never any charge. They refused to accept any donations. If one could not afford the modest cost of the concerts, they became guests of The Chopin Society, a charitable trust founded by the Fasons. In the 70's Fason got in a jam with the C.F.T.C. After years of litigation he settled for a $75,000.00 fine, which was peanuts to him. 3. There is little data on John Fason. All I could find was he graduated from Rice University Law School. My friend was overcharged by $22.00 by the Generic Co-op. Within a week he received a refund check, which it appeared Fason signed. The check was drawn on The First National bank of Sharp County, Ash Flat AR. I called the bank and was referred to Morris Street, an officer. Mr. Street knew John well and had only glowing comments. They handle all the VISA/MC business for the Co-op. I asked if they had many complaints about The Generic Co-op. He replied, " Not one from thousands of transactions. " MAKING SENSE OF ALL THIS There is no doubt that the Fasons walk to a beat of a different drummer. In reviewing the past newsletters on I came across this, allegedly written by his cat ON 8-26-01???: ********************************************* " IF YOU BOUGHT BETA SITOSTEROL RECENTLY, YOU GOT E-SCREWED! The lab report came in today. It revealed that the current production of Beta Sitosterol contains only 90% of what is claimed. To meet the CO-op's specifications it must have a minimum of 97%. I advised him to just clam up, as you would never know the difference for it is still almost twice as potent as the previous production. For some mysterious reason, Jon believes that a failure to disclose a material fact is exactly the same as lying. A cat would never embrace such an archaic position. Therefore, if you purchased the recent production, please multiply the number of bottles times .88 cents. On your next order, remind us that we owe you, and it will be deducted from the total of your new order. Until this production is sold out, the price has been reduced .88 cents to $7.89. I still think it is stupid to give away .88 cents on 25,000 bottles. " ************************************************ Has anyone ever heard of a company voluntarily disclosing that their product failed to meet specifications and giving a refund? I inquired of the Co-op about the laboratory reports which they once published. They quickly faxed a few to me. I have never heard of any other supplement marketer making their lab reports public. I verified that the free vitamins, claimed to have been given to charities, was correct. A couple of two minute phone calls was all that was needed. It is difficult to understand the allegations, of Hanson and Miller, that the $1.00 donations went in to Fason's pocket. Makes no sense that one who has given away a fortune would bother with $1.00 donations to enrich himself. The allegation that the Co-op is a big profit maker makes no sense as I cannot find any competitive products with the same, or better, pricing. Most are 2-4X more expensive. If the Co-op is such a profit center, why are they closing membership soon? Is it possible that the Co-op is losing money and the Fasons, or whoever, do not wish to provide more funding? I have no answer for this. CONCLUSION: I cannot find any evidence of criminal or ethical wrongdoing. I only find a number of instances of philanthropy, over many years. To suggest that a person is a criminal for writing under a pen name is ludicrous. It is commonly done to protect one's privacy. Authors do it all the time. I would ask Mr. Hanson and Ms. Miller to produce evidence that anyone has been harmed, in any way, by the actions of the Co-op or the Fasons. If they produce none, then one must conclude that all this was a vicious character assasination, done not to protect consumers from criminals, but for reasons only they know. I have been told that Hanson and Miller are active in multi-level marketing . . . an area well know for being inhabited by paragons of virtue and honor. Most of the posts on this letter are of great interest to me. Thank you. Have a good day all. Darrell Sandlien " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 9, 2001 Report Share Posted December 9, 2001 Rob, are you baiting & switching we poor souls upon this List?! I find it highly unfair of you to post the first link well knowing that many of us will believe YOU & your provided link in good faith; then after we express concern, you SUDDENLY come up with a link that makes Dr. Jon perhaps seem okay after all. Perchance a good chuckle upon your behalf, watching the ebb & flow of how we your audience reacts? I for one am not amused. Now, if you are to suddenly claim you " just found " the second link you posted, well I for one shall be hesitant to believe you. I don't care how much you know about what ever subjects, after this I shall be very wary of ANYTHING you post & where it in the end may lead. Just My Opinion, Vache Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 9, 2001 Report Share Posted December 9, 2001 Gettingwell, marianne2406@a... wrote: I would say that Rob is just putting the evidence before us and letting us draw our own conclusions... " Could well be, though he could have posted both of the Links together so we could have formulated a better perspective upon the entire issue. How many persons may only read one of his posts & not the other? What type of balanced conclusion could they then honestly arrive at? Vache Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 9, 2001 Report Share Posted December 9, 2001 <<Rob, are you baiting & switching we poor souls upon this List?!>> No. <<Now, if you are to suddenly claim you " just found " the second link you posted, well I for one shall be hesitant to believe you. >> I " just found " the post. I forwarded it be fair to " Dr. Jon " . It was posted just this morning on the other list, see: - " darrell sandlien " <dsandlien <orthomolecular > Sunday, December 09, 2001 9:19 AM [orthomolecular] The Dr. Jon Scam You'll note that my original link to the web site expressing doubt about " Dr. Jon " was provided last night. You did not open it and read it with my original post. This morning's link was a repetition to you because you did not open and read it last night and requested more information today. Rob Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 14, 2001 Report Share Posted December 14, 2001 Rob Bartlett wrote: ************************************************ > Has anyone ever heard of a company voluntarily > disclosing that their product failed to meet > specifications and giving a refund? ***********************************************Answer: Yes, New Vision International, Inc., Tempe, AZ, did the same thing a few years ago,when their laboratory inadvertantly didn't have New Vision's new product, " Pyruvate, " formulated as New Vision had specified. Plus, they reimbursed all of their customers who'd purchased Pyruvate, by giving them (2) bottles of the correctly formulated Pyruvate, in exchange for returning the wrongly manufactured product (including, covering the " cost of the return postage " ). ******************************************* Rob also wrote: I inquired of the Co-op about the laboratory reports > which they once published. They quickly faxed a few > to me. I have never heard of any other supplement > marketer making their lab reports public. ****************************************************Answer: New Vision International, Inc. also supplied their laboratory reports directly to the public (and especially to ALL of their consumers), even without the consumers first asking for them.. Many consumers no longer purchased from New Vision after the Pyruvate fiasco, also saying, " New Vision must not be a very good company, if their laboratory made such an error! " New Vision also could have kept quiet about it all, who would have known the difference? But the Boreyko family, the owners of New Vision, also felt it was like " lying, " not to divulge the truth. Nevertheless, New Vision still is going loud & strong today with their very successful company! (Their motto is: GOD first -- FAMILY second -- BUSINESS, third.) I fully believe Dr. Jon (no matter what his name truly is). I purchased from him, and have no regrets. With warm regards, Esther > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.