Guest guest Posted November 22, 2001 Report Share Posted November 22, 2001 Greg wrote: << There was a control group which did not use canola and experienced normal heart attack and death rates. In the canola group there were NO cardio deaths and in fact the study was stopped after about 2 years and both groups placed on the canola diet due to the strong result. The lack of deaths and the use of canola were the only two significant variations between the two groups. >> You just make up stuff. The diets were very different, as the following two excerpts show. The healthy diet was not called the " canola diet " as you have called it; it was called the Mediterranean diet, and the research team " counseled the other to eat a Mediterranean-type diet, with more bread, cereals, legumes, beans, vegetables, fruits, and fish and less meat. " The following excerpt is from the Yale-New Haven medical center's website at http://www.ynhh.org/healthlink/cardiac/cardiac_7_99.html << The Lyon Diet Heart Study The latest study, published in March in Circulation, the journal of the American Heart Association, is a four-year follow-up of more than 600 men and women in France who had experienced a first heart attack, which put them at high risk for a second attack. About half the participants were advised to eat a Mediterranean-style diet rich in fruits, vegetables, fish, cereals and beans. After 46 months of follow-up, the control subjects who ate a western diet and the experimental subjects were examined. Body fat, blood pressure and blood cholesterol levels were very similar, and about 18 percent of each group smoked cigarettes. The group eating the Mediterranean diet had a 50-70 percent lower risk of mortality due to a reduction in coronary heart disease. The control group averaged almost 34 percent of total calories from fat with almost 12 percent from saturated fat compared with 30 percent fat calories and 8 percent saturated fat calories in the other group's diet. The individuals on the Mediterranean diet consumed more oleic and alpha-linolenic fatty acids, the omega-3 fatty acids found in high amounts in canola, olive and certain nut oils. The control group consumed more linoleic or omega-6 fatty acids found in soya and sunflower oils. Dietary fiber intake was about three grams higher in the Mediterranean group than the control group indicating a higher intake of antioxidants and B vitamins found in fruits and vegetables, all of which may slow the arterial damage that precedes heart disease. >> The following is from 0_01.html by Volume 291, Number 5513, Issue of 30 Mar 2001, pp. 2536-2545. 2001 by The American Association for the Advancement of Science. http://people.bu.edu/sobieraj/nutrition/fat_science3_3 << This interpretation--that the connection between diet and health far transcends cholesterol--is also supported by the single most dramatic diet-heart trial ever conducted: the Lyon Diet Heart Study, led by Michel de Lorgeril of the French National Institute of Health and Medical Research (INSERM) and published in Circulation in February 1999. The investigators randomized 605 heart attack survivors, all on cholesterol-lowering drugs, into two groups. They counseled one to eat an AHA " prudent diet, " very similar to that recommended for all Americans. They counseled the other to eat a Mediterranean-type diet, with more bread, cereals, legumes, beans, vegetables, fruits, and fish and less meat. Total fat and types of fat differed markedly in the two diets, but the HDL, LDL, and total cholesterol levels in the two groups remained virtually identical. Nonetheless, over 4 years of follow-up, the Mediterranean-diet group had only 14 cardiac deaths and nonfatal heart attacks compared to 44 for the " Western-type " diet group. The likely explanation, wrote de Lorgeril and his colleagues, is that the " protective effects [of the Mediterranean diet] were not related to serum concentrations of total, LDL or HDL cholesterol. " Many researchers find the Lyon data so perplexing that they're left questioning the methodology of the trial. Nonetheless, says NIH's Harlan, the data " are very provocative. They do bring up the issue of whether if we look only at cholesterol levels we aren't going to miss something very important. " De Lorgeril believes the diet's protective effect comes primarily from omega-3 fatty acids, found in seed oils, meat, cereals, green leafy vegetables, and fish, and from antioxidant compounds, including vitamins, trace elements, and flavonoids. He told Science that most researchers and journalists in the field are prisoners of the " cholesterol paradigm. " Although dietary fat and serum cholesterol " are obviously connected, " he says, " the connection is not a robust one " when it comes to heart disease. >> Kathy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 25, 2001 Report Share Posted November 25, 2001 - <ksheabrown Friday, November 23, 2001 9:41 AM Canola - how about facts? Greg wrote: << There was a control group which did not use canola and experienced normal heart attack and death rates. In the canola group there were NO cardio deaths and in fact the study was stopped after about 2 years and both groups placed on the canola diet due to the strong result. The lack of deaths and the use of canola were the only two significant variations between the two groups. >> You just make up stuff. Hi Kathy What did I make up? The researchers on the Lyons Heart study concluded the only significant difference between the two groups was the elevated Omega 3 LNA from the canola oil and margarine and lower Omega 6 from not using veggie oils and margarine. Here is the full results of the Lyon Heart study: http://circ.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/full/99/6/779 Mediterranean Diet, Traditional Risk Factors, and the Rate of Cardiovascular Complications After Myocardial Infarction Final Report of the Lyon Diet Heart Study Here is the crux of the paper which concludes the elevation of Omega 3 LNA was the only significant dietary event which eliminated deaths. Where did the majority of Omega 3 LNA come from? Canola oil and margarine! " With regard to any association between the plasma concentration of major fatty acids and recurrence, only 18:3w3 and 22:6e3 tended to be inversely associated with recurrence (P=0.11 and P=0.16, respectively, versus CO 1). Then, the effect of traditional risk factors on recurrence was analyzed with the multivariate Cox proportional-hazards model (Table 5). When the plasma fatty acid concentrations were entered into the model, 18:3w3 was the only fatty acid significantly associated with CO 1 (risk ratio, 0.20; 95% CIs, 0.05 to 0.84 after adjustment for age, sex, smoking, total cholesterol, blood pressure, leukocyte count, and aspirin use). With regard to the effect of 18:3w3 on CO 2 and CO 3, the associations were borderline nonsignificant (P=0.08 and P=0.12 " Following the Lyon result many researcher went looking for the cardio protective agents involved. Here is one of the significant results which supports it is the Omega 3 EPA and DHA in the membranes of the heart muscle that are the active agents. http://circ.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/full/99/6/733 Dietary Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease The Lyon Diet Heart Study ======================== Good Health & Long Life, Greg Watson, gowatson USDA database (food breakdown) http://www.nal.usda.gov/fnic/foodcomp/ PubMed (research papers) http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi DWIDP (nutrient analysis) http://www.walford.com/dwdemo/dw2b63demo.exe KIM (omega analysis) http://ods.od.nih.gov/eicosanoids/KIM_Install.exe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.