Norway Becomes First Country to Ban Amalgam Fillings

[Guest guest]

Norway Becomes First Country to Ban Amalgam Fillings

 

http://www.naturalnews.com/022943.html

 

(NaturalNews) Effective January 1st of this year, Norway has become the

first nation to legislate a sweeping ban on the use of amalgam fillings

in dental work. Previous laws forbid the use of mercury-containing

fillings in more vulnerable segments of the population, such as pregnant

women and children, but the new law is the first to forbid the use of

the toxic metal without exemption. Mercury has also been banned from all

other products produced, imported, exported, sold, and used in the

country.

In a prepared statement, Norway's Minister of Environment and

Development, Erik Solheim stated that " Mercury is among the most

dangerous environmental toxins. Satisfactory alternatives to mercury in

products are available, and it is therefore fitting to introduce a ban. "

Sweden has followed suit with a ban on mercury fillings effective April

1st, 2008, and other countries are now contemplating similar moves.

Amalgam fillings, which unbeknownst to many are composed primarily of

mercury, raise the level of mercury circulating in the blood. Mercury is

listed as one of the most toxic substances on earth and many who are

sensitive to the substance have reported improvements in health upon

removal of the toxic fillings. The Norwegian and Swedish bans come at a

time when alternative composite fillings have become strong enough to

replace amalgams under practically any circumstance.

The issue, however, is as much environmental as it is salutary.

According to the Environmental Protection Agency, medical waste

incinerators emit 70,000 pounds of mercury into the biosphere each year,

making medical use of the metal one of the leading contributors to

mercury pollution. So the question has to be asked, why has U.S. policy

been so slow to catch up with common sense?

" These bans clearly indicate that amalgam is no longer needed. There are

viable non-mercury filling substitutes that are used everyday in the

U.S., " said Michael Bender of the U.S. Mercury Policy Project. " By

eliminating amalgam use, which is 50% mercury, we can reduce mercury

pollution much more efficiently than end-of-the-pipeline solutions. "

It should come as no surprise that many figures in the U.S. are taking

the new emerging consensus kicking and screaming. " Banning 'dental

amalgam' is a political issue that will not only have no impact on total

worldwide mercury pollution, but also removes a viable treatment option

for dentists and their patients, " argues Derek Jones in an editorial

published in the Journal of Dental Research. Bold steps are being taken,

but there is still much work to be done before a similar ban will be

seen in the U.S.

About the author

Adam Miller is a student of life who has dedicated literally thousands

of hours of personal research on top of formal institutional training in

Dietetics to learn the secrets of achieving vibrant health and extended

lifespan. His passion and dedication is in bringing the best ideas for

self-empowerment through nutrition and nutraceuticals as well as

alternative therapies, technology, and information to the public through

various means.

###

Related Articles [links on page]

& bull; The great thimerosal cover-up: Mercury, vaccines, autism and your

child's health

& bull; Mercury Does Not Belong in Light Bulbs or Vaccines

& bull; Natural Approaches for the Prevention of Oral Cancer and

Periodontal Disease

& bull; The Mad Hatter Syndrome: mercury and biological toxicity

& bull; How to get mercury fillings removed without exposing yourself to

toxic mercury vapor