Guest guest Posted March 13, 2007 Report Share Posted March 13, 2007 That article you quote is only valid when you consider the choices as treating prostate cancer by TRADITIONAL methods such as surgery, chemo or radiation versus doing nothing at all, a very poor group of choices for long-term health to begin with. Treating prostate cancer with natural alternatives such as detoxing, healthy diet and lifestyle choices and proven natural anti-cancer and immune boosters is much better than doing nothing at all, since it results in a healthier body, strong immune system and better odds at living linger and warding off illness and disease regardless of what happens with the prostate cancer. Tradtional treatment on the other hand, does indeed often result in painful and harmful side effects that effect the quality of life over the long term and also increase the risk of other cancers and diseases gaining a foothold due to the damage that chemo and radiation cause to major organs and the immune system. In the instance of surgery, often surgical procedures may help cancer spread to other parts of the body, besides the possible other after effects that can accompany surgery. Live long, live healthy, live happy! Tony Isaacs http://health.oleander soup<http://health.\ > On 3/12/07, robert-blau <robert-blau wrote: > > [newstarget.com] > > Health: For prostate cancer, doing nothing is often just as good as > seeking immediate treatment > In many lower-risk cases of prostate cancer, men actually may place > their health at greater risk by treating the cancer than by waiting and > monitoring it, according to many doctors. But a new study by Dr. Daniel > Barocas, chief resident in... > http://www.newstarget.com/021689.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.