Guest guest Posted March 10, 2007 Report Share Posted March 10, 2007 Thank you Betsy for your post. The suggestion is that the vaccine makers are really interested in protecting girls from cancer. And we the society accept that the way to protect girls from the possibility of a low incidence rather low death risk disease is by injecting them with known, verified, documented life harming poisons such as mercury. The irony is that it is a double edge sword- the vaccine says it will protect a girl from 4 strains out of a 100 but we all know that viruses mutate. So not only do we not get good coverage to begin with (and are willing to expose ourselves to mercury contamination to get it) but there is no way to keep up with the new strains to come. The vaccine makers are driven by greed, I completely agree. Do you think the above facts and their ramifications escape those who make the profits? They make money when they sell the vaccine, they make money when people take chances with their health because they think they are protected when they are not and do get sick and need pharmaceuticals and other medical interventions, they make money when people are harmed for life by the vaccines themeselves. They just hope and do their best to make sure, we the public, are too dazed and misinformed to figure it out. Why not promote Bob Beck's protocol, or Essiac or Wheatgrass juice, or Oleander, or Ozone, etc. if you want to make health improving aids available? Why do your best to stamp out inexpensive natural health giving support? Clearly vaccine makers do not make vaccines to help us but to make money. And if the goal is to make money- why not make as much money as you can? Vaccinate everyone. So if it is not for protection, and it is not just about money- what is the deal behind vaccinating our prepubescent girls? Will this vaccine make our girls sterile? Have vaccines made people in other countries, particularly 3rd world countries sterile? Is there a past history of vaccines and catastrophy? Is there a link between HIV and the Hepatitis B vaccines that were given out to the gay population before the first wave of AIDS? Has it been offically stated by the powers that be that they want the world's population cut by half? Best Wishes, Misty L. Trepke http://health. , Elizabeth Sinkey <westoo wrote: > > Why just girls? Am sure it's because boys don't get cervical cancer which is the original reason they said girls needed it. They might have gotten around to finding something special for the boys too, eventually. > Betsy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.