Guest guest Posted March 10, 2007 Report Share Posted March 10, 2007 Why just girls? Am sure it's because boys don't get cervical cancer which is the original reason they said girls needed it. They might have gotten around to finding something special for the boys too, eventually. Betsy Betsy <westoo wrote: Moderator's Note: Thank you Betsy for this post. I do feel money is a big part of the issue- but not the driving factor. If it were- why only push to vaccinate the girls- boys carry the virus too. Why isolate half of your potential market? And if it is not out of the kindness of their heart to really protect the girls (see: only 4 strains out of a hundred anyways.) Then for me the horrible question becomes what do the powers that be want to do to our nation's prepubescent girls? Misty Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.