Guest guest Posted March 3, 2007 Report Share Posted March 3, 2007 So, another state wants to " require " that a live, genetically modified cancer virus be put into girls to help stop a rather low incidence cancer that is rather easily treated if caught in time but they don't see the need to vaccinate the boys who could also be carriers of the virus? And while there is no law that requires any vaccine (outside of the new developments in TX via the governor's executive order) you have to exempt out of this vaccine by filing paperwork with the school... So no law- but you have to do it- but you can not do it- " if " you register with the school??? And the vaccine would allegedly protect them from something like 4 strains of the virus while there are known to be at least a hundred different strains out there. So how much real protection are we talking about even if we table the discussion as to the effectiveness of vaccines? Now Merck, the vaccine maker, the same people that offered us Vioxx, would make up to $900 a child- but even considering that- doesn't something seem fishy? WHY ONLY THE GIRLS? If greed is the driving factor- since protection doesn't hold up to examination- Merck would make twice as much if the boys had to be vaccinated too... Anyone else wondering what the real deal is? Other comments? Misty L. Trepke http://health. Virginia to require cancer vaccine for girls http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17417178/ Second state after Texas to mandate shot for sexually transmitted virus RICHMOND, Va. - Gov. Timothy M. Kaine said Thursday he would sign legislation requiring all sixth-grade girls to be vaccinated against the sexually transmitted virus that can cause cervical cancer. Virginia would become the second state to mandate the vaccine for the human papillomavirus, or HPV, and the first to do it through legislative action. Texas Gov. Rick Perry sidestepped the Legislature and ordered the shots for girls there, but lawmakers are considering overriding that order. " I think it strikes the right balance, " said Kaine, who wanted to make sure parents would have enough time to review the vaccine and allow them to opt out " without having to jump through hoops. " The requirement would go into effect for the 2009 school year. If parents want to opt out, they must review literature provided by their child's school, then sign a form. The federal government approved Gardasil, the only vaccine on the market, in June and suggested it be given to females before they become sexually active. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.