Homeopathic Provings re: medicine and healing through the ages

[Guest guest]

Dear Betsy,

 

Actually, there is a specific reason why a person would in a very

narrow case take something to make them sick in the name of healing.

That is called proving a homeopathic remedy. In this case you would

give a material dose of a substance until it makes a person ill and

then record what those symtpoms of illness are. If you take arsenic

it might result in stomach upset, waking around 1:00 in the morning

and having critical, judgemental thoughts of others. Once this

information is recorded, you stop taking the arsenic and health should

return. This is obviously all done in controlled circumstances.

 

You do this so when a person seeking health comes to your door for

help and has stomach upset with problems of waking around 1:00 am and

is critical of others you have a pretty clear match of their symptom

picture with the symptom picture that Arsenicum Alb. will address.

Notice the name of the remedy is slightly different than arsenic- that

is because it is given in Homeopathic form which uses latin. Where

you proved the material does- what we are all familiar with- the

remedy itself is diluted. And almost always diluted to the point

where no remaining physical atoms of arsenic remain- a purified

expression of the energetic signature of arsenic. Ironically, the

more dilute the more powerful, the more potent, the remedy becomes.

Less truly is more. These dilute administrations are said to

stimulate the body's inner healing wisdom resulting in the restoration

of balance to the body. When people think Homeopathic- obviously the

dilution part sticks in their mind- a very unsual concept, and a very

important principle, but Homeopathy itself means

 

Homeo- Similar

Pathy- Suffering

 

So put together " Homeopathy " literally means taking a remedy that has

the ability to cause the illness in a healthy person that it will cure

in a sick person.

 

Thankfully once the remedy has been sufficiently proved there is no

longer a need to keep proving it. Not to say that it can't be or

shouldn't be, nor to say that new remedies are going through this

process all the time. Just that you, the end user, need not suffer

through these provings. Unless you wish to participate in this great

learing experiment. The dedication and sacrifice of these brave

people, often times 150-100 years ago, still brings healing and relief

to people today from the vast, intricate and extremely comprehensive

information that they helped to collect.

 

Misty L. Trepke

http://health.

 

 

- In , Elizabeth Sinkey

<westoo wrote:

>

> No, Tony, you are not a kook. Let me add one more thought and I

don't remember who said it but I'll try to find out: " Why would a

sick person take a medicine that would make a healthy person sick if

he took it? "

> Betsy

>