The Government's 9/11 Facade is Crumbling

[Guest guest]

I would also add the stand down of Norad, and the confusion caused

by the drills being run at the same time about just this sort of

occurance... Who has the power to arrange that?

 

Other comments?

Misty L. Trepke

www..com

 

The Government's 9/11 Facade is

Crumbling

 

by John Perry

 

http://www.opednews.com

First things first:

 

Any time two or more people are

knowingly involved in the commission of

a crime, there is, by definition, a

conspiracy. This is not a theory, folks.

It's a stone-cold, undeniable fact. So

the real question about 9/11 is not

whether there was a conspiracy, but

indeed exactly who the conspirators are.

 

It really is this simple:

 

1) Either 19 guys with box cutters, led

by a guy hiding in a cave in

Afghanistan, were able to hijack four

major airliners, fly them with expert

precision (even though flight

instructors say they could barely even

fly Cessnas), avoid the most

sophisticated air defense system in the

history of the world and hit three of

four targets in New York and Washington,

killing nearly 3000 people and thus

pulling off history's most spectacular

terrorist attack,

Or:

2) A rouge criminal element within our

own government, with the means, motive

and standing to benefit tremendously,

both financially and politically, either

helped to make it happen or fully

orchestrated it themselves.

 

By the way, about that guy hiding in the

cave in Afghanistan that supposedly led

the hijackers: In June of this year,

when questioned about why Osama bin

Laden's wanted poster did not mention

the 9/11 attacks, an official from the

FBI stated that they had " no hard

evidence " of his involvement (Google

" FBI no hard evidence " ).

 

9/11 Truth Movement Gaining Steam

 

Nineteenth century philosopher Arthur

Schopenhauer said the following about

truth:

 

" All truth passes through three stages.

First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is

violently opposed. Third, it is accepted

as being self-evident. "

 

Similarly, Gandhi said this:

" First they ignore you, then they

ridicule you, then they fight you, then

you win. "

 

The importance of America and the world

accepting and reacting accordingly to

the horrible truth about 9/11 cannot be

overstated. If you think it doesn't

affect you because you didn't lose

anybody on 9/11, or you don't have any

loved ones (civilians or military) in

the midst of George W. Bush's subsequent

and utterly bogus " war on terror " , I

would urge you in the strongest possible

terms to rethink your position.

 

We must not only be concerned with

exacting proper justice for the mass

murder of 9/11. We must also be

concerned with ending the tide of

tyranny that has begun to wash over us

as a result of that tragic day,

threatening freedom, democracy, and the

world as we know it. They who seek to

rule us with an iron fist, pretending to

protect us by destroying our liberty,

must be told in no uncertain terms that

we the people thoroughly reject their

despotism, in favor of the

constitutional democracy that our

country has lived by for more than 200

years.

 

Thankfully, many more are beginning to

awaken to the truth of 9/11, and that

can only be good. But we have a long way

to go. There are, as you might imagine,

many websites dedicated to this issue.

If I could recommend a single site to

point people to in the effort to grow

our movement, it would be Scholars for

9/11 Truth. Bookmark it and refer to it

often. You will also reach many other

sites from there.

 

The single most influential voice of the

9/11 truth movement is unquestionably

Alex Jones. Visit his sites here and

here.

 

In June of this year, Jones conducted a

9/11 symposium that was broadcast

multiple times on CSPAN. Put 90 minutes

aside and watch it here.

 

In addition to the Jones symposium and

its multiple broadcasts on CSPAN, two

national polls have recently come out

(one just last week) that show very

significant doubt of the " official

story " of 9/11 among the American

people, indicating rapid mainstream

growth of the 9/11 truth movement.

 

A Scripps Howard / Ohio University poll,

released last week, reveals that 36

percent of Americans now believe it is

either " somewhat likely " or " very

likely " that the government was involved

in the 9/11 attacks.

 

Additionally, a Zogby International

Poll, released in May, revealed that 42

percent of Americans believe that the

(9/11 Commission and the government are

" covering up " .

 

These numbers might seem surprising,

given the precious little positive

exposure our movement has received from

the mainstream media to this point (with

the exception, of course, of the

excellent coverage of the Jones 9/11

Symposium by CSPAN). But I believe what

they actually reveal is that as people

continue to witness things like the

mountain of Bush lies that launched the

disaster that is Iraq, his pathetic lack

of any kind of coherent plan to get us

out, warrantless wiretapping, secret

examining of our banking records, bogus

signing statements, his belief that he

is above the law, and his obvious

contempt for the Constitution ( " Stop

throwing the Constitution in my

face...It's just a goddamned piece of

paper " ), they're putting two and two

together, questioning everything, doing

their homework and learning the truth

for themselves.

 

Imagine where these poll numbers will go

if the mainstream media really starts

giving the truth movement some

legitimate coverage.

 

From the Zogby poll, incidentally, it's

also very interesting to note that 43

percent were not aware of the collapse

of World Trade Center Building 7 on

9/11. This was a 47-story building that

did have small fires burning in various

places, but was not hit by any airplane,

nor by either of the falling twin

towers, yet collapsed straight down, at

free-fall speed, into its own footprint

at around 5:30 that afternoon. There has

never been an official explanation given

for the collapse of building 7, and the

9/11 Commission completely ignored the

collapse in its final report.

 

Is it not disturbing that a 47-story

building became the third steel frame

structure in history to completely

collapse on its own, the first two being

WTC towers 1 and 2 earlier that same

day, and the 9/11 Commission didn't care

enough to even comment on it? Many have

burned for as long as several days, but

no steel frame building anywhere in the

world had ever collapsed due to fire

before 9/11, and none have collapsed due

to fire since 9/11.

 

Pentagon False Flag

 

As far as the Pentagon is concerned,

there is no concrete evidence of a 757

crash. Something obviously did hit the

building, of course, but photos indicate

that it was something much smaller. A

757 is 155 feet long, 44 feet high (to

the top of the rear stabilizer), with a

124 foot wingspan and two engines that

are each 8 feet in diameter, each

weighing 6 tons. The building is 71 feet

tall.

 

The initial Pentagon impact (before the

partial building collapse) left a round

hole approximately 16 feet in diameter,

with fully intact windows directly above

and to each side. There was no initial

damage to the building where the wings,

engines or tail of a 757 would have hit.

 

Whatever really did hit the Pentagon is

no doubt seen clearly on the security

videotapes that were confiscated from

the nearby gas station and Sheraton

National Hotel by the FBI within minutes

of the impact on the morning of 9/11,

which is why they have never been

released. Doesn't it seem odd that our

TV screens were plastered with thousands

of images of planes flying into the

World Trade Center in the first few days

after 9/11, yet we have never been shown

the full motion video of the Pentagon

impact that is known to exist? What are

they hiding?

 

The PNAC Factor

 

No story on this issue would be complete

without mentioning the Project for the

New American Century (PNAC), a

neo-conservative, pro-war " think tank " ,

hell bent on mobilizing America's

massive military strength to serve their

own worldwide imperial mission.

 

PNAC counts among its membership such

prominent people as Vice President Dick

Cheney, Defense Secreatry Donald

Rumsfeld, Cheney's former chief of staff

Scooter Libby, Rumsfeld's former

assistant Secretary of Defense Paul

Wolfowitz (who now heads the World

Bank), and Jeb Bush, Governor of Florida

and the president's brother.

 

In September of 2000, PNAC issued a

report called Rebuilding America's

Defenses (you'll need a pdf file

reader – get it free from Adobe), which

is basically their war manifesto.

 

Wolfowitz is said to be the main

architect of the manifesto, which is

based on a document called " The

Wolfowitz Doctrine " , written in 1992 by

then Undersecretary of Defense for

Policy Wolfowitz and his then assistant

Libby.

 

Of course, PNAC couldn't initiate their

plan without having people in very

prominent positions in government to

pull the right strings. That's why

Cheney, when tapped to lead the search

for George W. Bush's vice presidential

running mate for the 2000 election,

chose himself. He then of course made

sure his long time, war mongering,

neocon friend Don Rumsfeld (they go back

to the Nixon administration together)

was inserted as the new Defense

Secretary, another key position.

Wolfowitz and Libby followed to fill

their respective positions in the new

Bush government.

 

See my original article on 9/11 – " The

Ugliest Truth " , for details on the cozy

little 35 year friendship between Rummy

and Uncle Dick, as well as many links

for you to explore regarding the truth

about 9/11.

 

The problem the PNAC had, even with all

the right people in place, was that they

couldn't launch a war and initiate their

plan just because they wanted to. The

people would never go for it, and

Congress would never fund it. They

needed an excuse.

 

Indeed, this is something they

themselves recognized. On page 51 of

" Rebuilding America's Defenses " (again,

issued in September of 2000, one year

before 9/11), you will find the

following quote:

 

" Further, the process of transformation,

even if it brings revolutionary change,

is likely to be a long one, absent some

catastrophic and catalyzing event - like

a new Pearl Harbor. "

 

So once again, I ask you:

 

19 pissed off guys with boxcutters,

whose only apparent benefit was the

supposed 72 virgins waiting for them

when they got to the other side, or a

rouge criminal element within our own

government, with the means, motive and

standing to benefit tremendously, both

financially and politically?

 

May the truth soon be revealed for the

entire world to see.