Guest guest Posted July 27, 2001 Report Share Posted July 27, 2001 A few days ago I wrote quite a long post responding to your post on homeopathic mercury, Ian, but it seems to have disappeared into cyberspace, so I will summarise what I wrote. I have just read a book called Prakriti which is on Ayurvedic medicine. At the end is a chapter on bhismas- which are medicines made from metals and minerals, including mercury, gold and silver, diamonds, and many others. The technique for preparing the metals is thousands of years old. They are purified, them mixed with herbs, then incinerated- from maybe a dozen up to a thousand times. This can take years, and the resulting very fine powders, which have ben rendered totally inactive- they are oxides and sulfides if I remember correctly- are taken in tiny amounts- the size of a rice grain. They are highly valued in Ayurveda. There was a statement in the book quoting an ayurvedic saying that there is no disease that mercury cannot cure if it is taken correctly, and no disease it cannot cause if incorrectly prepared and taken. Mercury is highly valued. I actually trust that the ancient process of preparing these metals and minerals, and the knowledge of how to take them, is a time tested and worthy process of great value. However, when I studied naturopathy I learned of the damage that mercury based drugs can do- as well as their apparent miraculous powers, belying their insideous destruction. I believe it was simply too gross for our bodies the way they have been prepared in western medicine, but I am open to others knowing a better way. After all, its the same way we know about the power of herbs- the time tested way passed from generation to generation, from sages and seers, from herbalists and shamans, whatever the culture. So, I dont know about homeopathic mercury, but after reading this chapter on bhismas, I am open to what we call poisons- which is after all a label applied because of our negative experiences- having possibilities for healing , but only when prepared with the correct knowledge. my 2 cents love peela ===== May the long time sun shine upon you, all love suround you, and the pure light within you guide your way on. Traditional Blessing Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Messenger http://phonecard./ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 2, 2001 Report Share Posted August 2, 2001 Hmmmmm, just because it is old does not necessarily mean that it is true or overall good in the long run. Remember, we gave up blood letting at the end of the 19th Century. One of my problems with this 'metal' technology 'and' homeopathy is that too often the focus is on the symptom rather than the cause. For this reason I don't regard Homeopathy as a true Naturopathic science though perhaps at one time it may have been. See individual answers below to your statements. Ian "Doc" Shillington N.D.505-772-5889Dr.IanShillington I have just read a book called Prakriti which is on Ayurvedic medicine. At the end is a chapter on bhismas- which are medicines made from metals and minerals, including mercury, gold and silver, diamonds, and many others.The technique for preparing the metals is thousands of years old. Does not make it right and it is certainly not biochemical. They are purified, them mixed with herbs, then incinerated- from maybe a dozen up to a thousand times. This can take years, and the resulting very fine powders, which have been rendered totally inactive- they are oxides and sulfides if I remember correctly- are taken in tiny amounts- the size of a rice grain. They are highly valued in Ayurveda. Seems like an awful lot of work when I'm quite convinced that all disease is curable using Naturopathic methods. (I told you I was skeptical ;o) Knowledge is only as valuable as it is applicable. Just because it comes from some dusty old tome does not make it true or workable. One must ask oneself the question, "Can I use this piece of knowledge to achieve a workable result?". Don't place too much importance on 'ancient mysteries'. (LOL) There was a statement in the book quoting an ayurvedic saying that there is no disease that mercury cannot cure if it is taken correctly, and no disease it cannot cause if incorrectly prepared and taken. Most diseases are actually symptoms (bullets, steering wheels, and broken bones excepted and which are not really diseases in the first place) and even the medico (allopath) has learned that it is easy to suppress a symptom. Almost his entire science is base on this principle. The only problem is, and this holds true with using heavy metals as medicine, that down the road other diseases now surface and of course this has nothing to do with the earlier 'cure'. (Sheesh, is my sarcasm showing through? ;o) Mercury is highly valued. I actually trust that the ancient process of preparing these metals and minerals, and the knowledge of how to take them, is a time tested and worthy process ofgreat value. I don't! I don't trust them at all for the above given reasons. However, when I studied naturopathy I learned of the damage that mercury based drugs can do- as well as their apparent miraculous powers, belying their insideous destruction. Again, what are the long term effects? And, has the "cause" been handled? I repeat, if the cause has not been handled then the solution is only a bandaid and a suppression of the symptom. The headache patient does not have his headache because of an aspirin deficiency. Similarly, the consumption victim does not have his lung problems because of a mercury deficiency. Get the idea? I believe it was simply too gross for our bodies the way they have been prepared in western medicine, but I am open to others knowing a better way. Not me, or at least not for me! I admit quite freely to not knowing everything there is to know about Naturopathy, but I'll accept no man's work until I have verified his findings in actual clinical applications with consistent results. Too often we accept what an 'authority' has to say without personal inspection of his data and his findings and through laziness we assign others as 'cause' over our own health and lives. I think this is an extremely dangerous practice. The problem with 'open-mindedness' is that it lets in bad data as well as the good. I'm not a promoter of 'closed-mindedness' either, but rather prefer and advocate 'cause-mindedness' where the individual is fully responsible for his own condition and for the creation of his own future. To do this, he must fully acknowledge having caused his past and his existing present. Any scrape a person ever got himself into was preceded by his own choice to be there in the first place. This viewpoint may seem cold and uncompromising but it is the truth. At least, it is for me ;o) You need to decided for yourself (laugh). After all, its the same way we know about the power of herbs- the time tested way passed fromgeneration to generation, from sages and seers, from herbalists and shamans, whatever the culture. Hogwash! - Sounds romantic, but hogwash! As far as I'm concerned (IMOHO:o), Doc Christopher was the greatest herbalist of the 20th Century and he certainly didn't just accept what the sages, seers and shamans of the past had to say about a particular herbal cure though he studied them avidly. He tried, tested, and improved, - tried, tested, and improved and so on until he found a better way. Most of his remedies were unique. He invented them. They were his own creations. And he enjoined his students to take what he had to teach and carry it forward, not carve it in stone and let it rot. So, I dont know about homeopathic mercury, but after reading this chapter on bhismas, I am open to what we call poisons - which is after all a label applied because of our negative experiences- having possibilities for healing , but only when prepared with the correct knowledge. I agree with your basic philosophy here as long as you keep it to herbal and biochemical applications. When you marry this concept to inorganics, I strongly disagree.my 2 cents Worth at least 3 cents ;o) Not trying to pick on you here hon, I just wouldn't want to see you get complacent with your understandings. I love learning and creating new data. Stagnation scares me. Much love, Doc Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 2, 2001 Report Share Posted August 2, 2001 Ian, I simply dont know, but I insist on keeping an open mind about it! That doesnt mean I am going out there to ingest mercury, but I will be interested in further studies. As for Dr Christopher, I agree he was amazing, and I dont know his work exept through this list, and I am impressed and grateful to have come across it. He seems to have created a fairly unique and complete system of healing- but it is not without its roots in traditional herbalism. He was influenced. And that influence has an historical evolutional pattern- he just took it in a particular direction, and learnt from trial and error and perhaps insiration. So, sure just because something has been used by other cultures historically doesnt necessarily make it useful now, but you seem to be saying (correct me if I am wrong) Dr Christophers way is the best. It may be, and it may be a fairly complete healing system unto itself,but if you dont know everything thats out there- and you couldnt- wouldnt it be best to stay openminded? I am glad of the clinical data out there on herbs and healing methods, but that doesnt mean everything that hasnt been scientifically proven is not valid. However, when it comes to something like mercury, I can understand wanting validation. Homeopathy isnt scientifically proven-but there is heaps of evidence that it is far more than placebo. Real documented evidence,lots of it, if you care to look for it. Spiritual healing cant be proven. Lets not get stuck in the mindset that everything has to be proven. I will just stay with " I dont know " for mercury bhismas and other such dubious substances. I am comfortable with that. I understand though your desire on this list to stay with real experiences, solid stuff- there is a lot of hogwash out there, and this is a wonderful forum for communicating direct experience. I love to debate it though! love Peela --- " Ian Shillington N.D. " <Dr.IanShillington wrote: > Hmmmmm, just because it is old does not necessarily > mean that it is true > or overall good in the long run. Remember, we gave > up blood letting at > the end of the 19th Century. One of my problems > with this 'metal' > technology 'and' homeopathy is that too often the > focus is on the > symptom rather than the cause. For this reason I > don't regard > Homeopathy as a true Naturopathic science though > perhaps at one time it > may have been. > > See individual answers below to your statements. > > Ian " Doc " Shillington N.D. > 505-772-5889 > Dr.IanShillington > I have just read a book called Prakriti which is > on Ayurvedic > medicine. At the end is a chapter on bhismas- which > are medicines made > from metals and minerals, including mercury, gold > and silver, diamonds, > and many others. > The technique for preparing the metals is > thousands of years old. > > Does not make it right and it is certainly not > biochemical. > > They are purified, them mixed with herbs, then > incinerated- from maybe > a dozen up to a thousand times. This can take years, > and the resulting > very fine powders, which have been rendered totally > inactive- they are > oxides and sulfides if I remember correctly- are > taken in tiny amounts- > the size of a rice grain. They are highly valued in > Ayurveda. > > Seems like an awful lot of work when I'm quite > convinced that all > disease is curable using Naturopathic methods. (I > told you I was > skeptical ;o) Knowledge is only as valuable as it > is applicable. Just > because it comes from some dusty old tome does not > make it true or > workable. One must ask oneself the question, " Can I > use this piece of > knowledge to achieve a workable result? " . Don't > place too much > importance on 'ancient mysteries'. (LOL) > > There was a statement in the book quoting an > ayurvedic saying that > there is no disease that mercury cannot cure if it > is taken correctly, > and no disease it cannot cause if incorrectly > prepared and taken. > > Most diseases are actually symptoms (bullets, > steering wheels, and > broken bones excepted and which are not really > diseases in the first > place) and even the medico (allopath) has learned > that it is easy to > suppress a symptom. Almost his entire science is > base on this > principle. The only problem is, and this holds true > with using heavy > metals as medicine, that down the road other > diseases now surface and of > course this has nothing to do with the earlier > 'cure'. (Sheesh, is my > sarcasm showing through? ;o) > > Mercury is highly valued. I actually trust that > the ancient process > of preparing these metals and minerals, and the > knowledge of how to take > them, is a time tested and worthy process of > great value. > > I don't! I don't trust them at all for the above > given reasons. > > However, when I studied naturopathy I learned of > the damage that > mercury based drugs can do- as well as their > apparent miraculous powers, > belying their insideous destruction. > > Again, what are the long term effects? And, has > the " cause " been > handled? I repeat, if the cause has not been > handled then the solution > is only a bandaid and a suppression of the symptom. > The headache > patient does not have his headache because of an > aspirin deficiency. > Similarly, the consumption victim does not have his > lung problems > because of a mercury deficiency. Get the idea? > > I believe it was simply too gross for our bodies > the way they have > been prepared in western medicine, but I am open to > others knowing a > better way. > > Not me, or at least not for me! I admit quite > freely to not knowing > everything there is to know about Naturopathy, but > I'll accept no man's > work until I have verified his findings in actual > clinical applications > with consistent results. Too often we accept what > an 'authority' has to > say without personal inspection of his data and his > findings and through > laziness we assign others as 'cause' over our own > health and lives. I > think this is an extremely dangerous practice. The > problem with > 'open-mindedness' is that it lets in bad data as > well as the good. I'm > not a promoter of 'closed-mindedness' either, but > rather prefer and > advocate 'cause-mindedness' where the individual is > fully responsible > for his own condition and for the creation of his > own future. To do > this, he must fully acknowledge having caused his > past and his existing > present. Any scrape a person ever got himself into > was preceded by his > own choice to be there in the first place. This > viewpoint may seem cold > and uncompromising but it is the truth. At least, > it is for me ;o) You > need to decided for yourself (laugh). > > After all, its the same way we know about the > power of herbs- the time > tested way passed from > generation to generation, from sages and seers, > from herbalists and > shamans, whatever the culture. > > Hogwash! - Sounds romantic, but hogwash! As far > as I'm concerned > (IMOHO:o), Doc Christopher was the greatest > herbalist of the 20th > Century and he certainly didn't just accept what the > sages, seers and > shamans of the past had to say about a particular > herbal cure though he > studied them avidly. He tried, tested, and > improved, - tried, tested, > and improved and so on until he found a better way. > Most of his > remedies were unique. He invented them. They were > his own creations. > And he enjoined his students to take what he had to > teach and carry it > forward, not carve it in stone and let it rot. > > So, I dont know about homeopathic mercury, but > after reading this > chapter on bhismas, I am open to what we call > poisons - which is after > all a label applied because of our negative > experiences- having > possibilities for healing , but only when prepared > with the correct > knowledge. > > I agree with your basic philosophy here as long as > you keep it to > herbal and biochemical applications. When you marry > this concept to > inorganics, I strongly disagree. > > my 2 cents > > Worth at least 3 cents ;o) Not trying to pick on > you here hon, I just > wouldn't want to see you get complacent with your > understandings. I > love learning and creating new data. Stagnation > scares me. > > Much love, > Doc > ===== May the long time sun shine upon you, all love suround you, and the pure light within you guide your way on. Traditional Blessing Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Messenger http://phonecard./ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 2, 2001 Report Share Posted August 2, 2001 Dear Peela and Ian, Just wanted to let you both know that it is enjoyable reading your two extremely informative emails......as yousaid Peela - this is a wonderful forum.............Love Penny " I understand though your desire on this list to stay with real experiences, solid stuff- there is a lot of hogwash out there, and this is a wonderful forum for communicating direct experience. I love to debate it though! love Peela " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 8, 2001 Report Share Posted August 8, 2001 I will just stay with "I dont know" for mercury bhismas and other such dubious substances. I am comfortable with that. I understand though your desire on this list to stay with real experiences, solid stuff- there is a lot of hogwash out there, and this is a wonderful forum for communicating direct experience. I love to debate it though! Me too. Love, Doc Ian "Doc" Shillington N.D.505-772-5889Dr.IanShillington Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 5, 2005 Report Share Posted February 5, 2005 someone had a post couple weks ago about an alternative way to rid your body of mercury i d sure like that info if anyone read it thanks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 25, 2005 Report Share Posted February 25, 2005 In a message dated 2/25/2005 8:50:36 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, mowman100 writes: When I was young and a thermometer gotten broken we " PLAYED " with the mercury in our hands.I probably did this at least 3 times in my young life. WHAT HAVE I DONE!!!!!!!! I have been in excellant health all of my life. You were very lucky. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 27, 2005 Report Share Posted February 27, 2005 I'll say around these part's the health dept. is giving away digital thermometer's if you give them the mercury one's do a search on mercury toxic affect's with your filling's to the water you drink...Debbie , primalmommieto5@a... wrote: > > > In a message dated 2/25/2005 8:50:36 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 12, 2005 Report Share Posted April 12, 2005 when I went to the dentist last month and made a point of telling him I want composite not amalgam fillings, he scoffed at me saying there is mercury in everything and it he is not the least bit concerned ( this from a man who weighs about 500 lbs so you see how concerned this man is about health) of course I insisted and got the composite fillings. this is the kind of attitude you get from dentists. I dont understand why they would even consider amalgam fillings, since the composites dont last as long and the dentist makes more money in the long run off the composites anyway. - Jerry Mittelman wayne McDonald ; Stephen Baer ; Senator_Clinton ; metals ; Mercury Forums ; Holistic Healers Academy ; ; FreKoss ; flax.seed.oil ; DrClark ; dr.larry barsh ; dr.eda ellis Tuesday, April 12, 2005 4:10 PM Mercury It’s legal to put mercury into people’s mouths - but look at this: (from the Bolen Report) New Hampshire Clean Water Action has given the state a grade of D-plus for not doing enough to prevent mercury pollution from dental fillings. The environmental organization issued a report ranking New Hampshire as only above Vermont among New England states in addressing this contamination. Doug Bogen, program director for Clean Water Action, said the state took the lead in passing laws to address the problem, but the reforms have not been carried out. Bogen said the key thing is to prevent the contamination from getting into the waste stream and into Portsmouth Harbour or sludge that ends up in a landfill. He added landfills are places where mercury is converted into the more toxic form methyl mercury. o "Follow the money" - -when enough health-conscious people stop going to DDSs who put mercury in patients’ mouths, we’ll see a change in their "professionsl" attitude. In our practice, we went mercury-free in 1968. Wouldn’t it be great if N.H. made it illegal for DDSs to put this neurotoxin into people’s mouths! Jerry Mittelman, DDS, FAPM (Retired) - - - Reply with your po box or street address to get a freecopy of The Holistic Dental Digest PLUS.jmittelman What dentists aren't likely to learn in dental school «¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§ - PULSE ON WORLD HEALTH CONSPIRACIES! §Subscribe:......... - To :.... - Any information here in is for educational purpose only, it may be news related, purely speculation or someone's opinion. Always consult with a qualified health practitioner before deciding on any course of treatment, especially for serious or life-threatening illnesses.**COPYRIGHT NOTICE**In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107,any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 13, 2005 Report Share Posted April 13, 2005 Jerry, Do all silver fillings contain mercury? How would we know if our dentist put in ones with or without mercury??? ====================================== .. In a message dated 4/12/2005 7:23:46 P.M. Central Daylight Time, jmittelman writes: It's legal to put mercury into people's mouths - but look at this: (from the Bolen Report) New Hampshire Clean Water Action has given the state a grade of D-plus for not doing enough to prevent mercury pollution from dental fillings. The environmental organization issued a report ranking New Hampshire as only above Vermont among New England states in addressing this contamination. Doug Bogen, program director for Clean Water Action, said the state took the lead in passing laws to address the problem, but the reforms have not been carried out. Bogen said the key thing is to prevent the contamination from getting into the waste stream and into Portsmouth Harbour or sludge that ends up in a landfill. He added landfills are places where mercury is converted into the more toxic form methyl mercury. o " Follow the money " - -when enough health-conscious people stop going to DDSs who put mercury in patients' mouths, we'll see a change in their " professionsl " attitude. In our practice, we went mercury-free in 1968. Wouldn't it be great if N.H. made it illegal for DDSs to put this neurotoxin into people's mouths! Jerry Mittelman, DDS, FAPM (Retired) - - - Reply with your po box or street address to get a free copy of The Holistic Dental Digest PLUS. jmittelman What dentists aren't likely to learn in dental school Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 13, 2005 Report Share Posted April 13, 2005 In a message dated 4/12/2005 11:33:31 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, treblclef2 writes: How would we know if our dentist put in ones with or without mercury??? you ask. But yes they typically all have it. When my daughter was 6 and I was less informed, she had 12 silver crowns done at once.. ever since then she has had health issues *°º°*~Michelle~*°º°* Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 14, 2005 Report Share Posted April 14, 2005 - Sharon Jagger Tuesday, April 12, 2005 7:35 PM Re: Mercury when I went to the dentist last month and made a point of telling him I want composite not amalgam fillings, he scoffed at me saying there is mercury in everything and it he is not the least bit concerned ( this from a man who weighs about 500 lbs so you see how concerned this man is about health) of course I insisted and got the composite fillings. this is the kind of attitude you get from dentists. I dont understand why they would even consider amalgam fillings, since the composites dont last as long and the dentist makes more money in the long run off the composites anyway. Sharon - You go to the wrong DDS - could be troublesome for your future. We have a report on finding an Holistic Dentist - 9 things to look for. Reply with your p.o.box or street address, and we'll get it to you. Ask for the Holistic Dentist Report. Jerry Mittelman, DDS, FAPM (Retired) jmittelman Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 27, 2005 Report Share Posted October 27, 2005 Mary Hamilton 601 Jupiter Dr. Denton, TX 76209 ---- Jerry Mittelman 10/27/05 21:07:04 DrClark ; flax.seed.oil; Mercury IAOMT: Bill for Banning Amalgam Reintroduced A bill for banning amalgam has been (re)introduced to the house by Congresswoman Diane Watson. The bill is HR 4011. Congresswoman Watson's staff has encouraged us to get behind the bill and has asked the IAOMT to have its members contact their local representatives. We also strongly encourage the public to als do so. Please let them hear your voice! To find your local representative's contact information please visit: Contact your Representative .-- Reply with your name and street or po box address for your freecopy of The Holistic Dental Digest PLUS, now in its 27th year and helping people on 5 continents. jmittelman --What dentists aren't likely to learn in Dental School Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 9, 2005 Report Share Posted November 9, 2005 Mercury brings high anxiety in Brooklyn BY PAUL H.B. SHIN DAILY NEWS STAFF WRITER City inspectors have discovered dangerous levels of mercury vapor in Brooklyn's tallest building, triggering a cleanup before the landmark is converted to luxury condos, the Daily News has learned. Air samples taken inside the Williamsburgh Savings Bank, a longtime mecca for dentists, who use mercury for fillings, showed that mercury vapor levels exceeded the government-allowed limit in at least one room, according to a city Health Department inspection in June. In a former dentist's office on the eighth floor of the 34-story tower, an air sampler recorded 2,300 to 2,400 nanograms of mercury vapor per cubic meter, more than twice the level that would trigger a cleanup in a residential unit. A third of the other locations checked had vapor levels exceeding the residential thresholds of 200 to 300 nanograms recommended by two government agencies, even though they were under the limit that would mandate a cleanup, the inspection showed. - - - - - Reply with your name and street or po box address for your free copy of The Holistic Dental Digest PLUS, now in its 27th year and helping people on 5 continents. jmittelman --What dentists aren't likely to learn in Dental School Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.