US Desperately Seeking to Dismiss AIDS Origin Lawsuit

[Guest guest]

Comments?

Misty L. Trepke

http://www..com

 

U.S. DESPERATELY SEEKING TO DISMISS AIDS ORIGIN LAWSUIT

 

San Diego, CA. - Federal Judge Sabraw has ordered an open court oral

argument for Friday, June 24, 2005 at 1:30p.m.to hear arguments by

the United States to support a motion to dismiss the AIDS ORIGIN

lawsuit of Dr. Boyd Ed Graves. Dr. Graves AIDS ORIGIN research and

his nearly eight years of continuous legal action against the United

States for the creation, production and proliferation of HIV/AIDS has

been receiving critical acclaim from scientists and medical doctors

from all over the world.

 

I am hopeful, said Graves, that the Federal Court will deny the

United States motion to dismiss and allow this issue to reach a jury

verdict some time next year. I am certain reasonable people will

conclude the U.S AIDS ORIGIN documents require and demand further

accountability from the defendant, the United States of America.

 

Dr. Boyd Ed Graves can be reached at 619-578-3254

 

Now to the article....

 

According to the 1971 progress report of the U.S. Special Virus

program, HIV/AIDS is a recombinant (virus) agent that has been formed

by converging a leukemia and a lymphoma, a BIOLOGOCAL WEAPON.

 

In 1984, (alleged) co-discoverers of HIV/AIDS, Drs. Robert Gallo and

Luc Montagnue, concluded the original name of HIV/AIDS is

LEUKEMIA/LYMPHOMA virus. See, Montagnue, L. & Gallo, R.C., et. al.,

Human T-Cell Leukemia Lymphoma Virus Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory,

(Cold Spring Harbor, NY, 1984). Additionally, the United States

admits that the Nazi sheep virus visna, had not yet appeared in human

disease. Because no one could explain how this Nazi sheep virus

supposedly hopped species, the U.S. General Accounting Office began

an investigation into the U.S. origin of HIV/AIDS in July, 2001 at

the bequest of a Congressman.

 

The United States has sought to hide, dispel, distract and mislead

any serious inquiry into the U.S. Special Virus program at every

level and by every means necessary until this litigation.

 

AIDS co-developer himself, defendant, Robert C. Gallo concluded in a

report that HIV/AIDS evolved from Nazi sheep visna virus disease. (

See Gallo, R.C., et. al., Science, Vol. 223, pp. 173 ­ 177, January,

1985. See also, Proceedings of the United States of America, National

Academy of Sciences, Vol. 83, pp. 4007 ­ 4011, June, 1986, Sonigo,

Cell, 1985 Aug 42(1):369 ­ 362, Nucleotide Sequence of the Visna

Lentivirus: Relationship to the HIV/AIDS Virus. )

 

Proceedings of the United States of America, National Academy of

Sciences, ( Vol. 92, pp. 3283 ­ 3287, April 11, 1995.) outlined the

relationship of the Nazi sheep visna virus to the HIV virus.

 

Now what is interesting is the following:

 

In 1902, the United States funded the Cold Springs Harbor Laboratory

in New York, and two years later they opened the U.S. Station for

Experimental Evolution. (Development of Biological Weapons)

 

In 1910, chickens became the victims of a man made transmissible

agent which bears striking homology to HIV/AIDS, the Rous Sarcoma

Virus. The U.S. government has had a biological weapons program since

1910. What is even more interesting is that the Nazi sheep visna

virus did not exist before 1932. Yes, you got it, the Nazis'

developed the first strains and the U. S. Government Biologiocal

Weapons program continued on with this deadly virus. It is a

recombinant turned into the HIV (virus) agent, formed by converging a

leukemia and a lymphomathat according to Dr. Gallo and other

researchers.

 

What is so disturbing also is that a cure for the HIV virus has been

held back. On November 14, 1997, the U.S. awarded Rhode Island

Company, Marentech, ( the patent is registered to a Marvin S.

Antleman, Antleman Technologies Inc., Antlemann licensed it to

Marentech ), patent #5676977 for the cure for AIDS. In November,

2001, Boyd Graves who is the Plaintiff in this lawsuit accessed the

cure and has been free of prescription drugs for nearly two years.

The Plaintiff in the lawsuit and numerous other individuals have

taken the drug and have been free of having to take any other HIV/AID

prescriptions for two years.

 

On March 25, 2003, Presidential Executive Order 13292 was issued as a

means to prepare itself to further insulate the federal program that

made AIDS and keep the truth from the American public. This is a

travesty and insult to the American public.

 

Below is a copy of the actual Federal Court filing, Filed, March 1,

2003 in Los Angeles.

 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BOYD E. GRAVES,

Plaintiff, : Case No. : 02 cv2396

THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, : Judge Jeffrey Miller

 

Defendants & PLAINTIFFS RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO THE UNITED STATES

(UNTIMELY) MOTION TO ;

 

NOW COMES plaintiff, Boyd E. Graves, in propria persona who will

argue on June 27th, 2003 that the United States motion to dismiss the

lawsuit seeking the full disclosure of all United States documents

which imply directly or indirectly the United States has developed

HIV/AIDS (and other synthetic biological agents) should be denied.

The Court should Order the defendant to file an answer to the

complaint filed on December 6, 2002 and served on Attorney General

John Ashcroft on March 1, 2003 via certified mail.

 

DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS IS UNTIMELY

 

Pursuant to the federal rules of civil procedure, a federal defendant

has sixty days (60) in which to file an answer to a complaint or in

the alternative a motion to dismiss. In this instant action,

defendant chose to file a motion to dismiss in lieu of an answer. For

defendant motion to dismiss to be timely, the federal rules require

that defendant motion should have been filed no later than May 1,

2003. The record reflects that defendant filed its motion to dismiss

on May 5, 2003, on the 64th day. Defendant has failed to respond to

the complaint within the time period required by the federal rules.

Plaintiff believes the Court inherent equitable power should be

exercised by punishing defendant for delay and contumacious conduct

and requiring an immediate release of documents as aforementioned. In

that defendant motion for dismissal should be rejected, plaintiff

believes the Court should entertain the people motion for default

judgment against the United States.

 

BACKGROUND OF PLAINTIFF MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT

 

The intent and plain meaning of the Freedom of Information Act

requires the Court to Order the immediate full disclosure of all U.S.

documents which imply directly or indirectly the United States has

developed HIV/AIDS. The sheer public significance of the truths of

this issue demand the truth is known. The voluminous science, medical

and U.S. policy decisions in the development of HIV/AIDS can not be

overcome with vexing litigation, nor can they be further overlooked

by the judicial branch of the United States.

 

The United States Constitution requires the judicial branch of

government to do the people's business, particularly when the other

two branches of government have died from their own incestuous ness.

The judicial branch of government, specifically the United States

attorneys, owes a Constitutional obligation and duty of service to

the American people, to stand for the American people in the face of

wrongdoing by our government and to blow the whistle !on lawless acts

of the government or its employees In this instant action, it is the

U.S. attorneys who the Attorney General will assign who will have to

deal with the perplexing dichotomy of serving a Constitutional

government that seeks to secretly kill its own citizens and others.

 

Plaintiff believe the U.S. Constitution supports the immediate

disclosure of the U.S. Special Virus program and the equivalent U.S.

policy decisions to develop HIV/AIDS going back as far as the 1878

U.S. mandate of a U.S. Laboratory of Hygiene. Even today, the

laboratories mandate to research diseases of world original has not

been fully explained. In 1902, the United States funded the Cold

Springs Harbor Laboratory in New York, and two years later they

opened the U.S. Station for Experimental Evolution.

 

In 1910, chickens became the victims of a man made transmissible

agent which bears striking homology to HIV/AIDS, the Rous Sarcoma

Virus. A genuine issue exists that compels the Court to look at the

evidence in favor of the no-moving party. Here, the United States

cannot withstand the science and medical evidence of AIDS

bioengineering being presented from their own policy decisions, sworn

testimony and progress reports of the secret program. Here, the

United States must rely on American citizens (U.S. attorneys) to

buffer it from the masses of the American citizenry, in our quest for

truth and fact. The American citizenry should not remain in the dark

as to the antics of a Constitutional government, who on the one hand

espouses equality and freedom for all, while at the same time,

socially engineering (centralizing) the intelligence to allow for

ethnic cleansing and genocide.

 

Clearly here, the establishment of the true origin and root cause of

a mystery plague that has mysteriously ingratiated itself into the

human genome within the last eighty years, would significantly impact

animal and human medicine and !science for the next thousand years.

Without the immediate intervention of the judicial branch of

government, entire racial species and ethnic creeds of millions of

people could be artificially removed by the ongoing development and

continuation of state sponsored ethnic weapons of mass destruction.

 

HIV/AIDS IS A SYNTHETIC BIOLOGICAL AGENT

 

According to the 1971 progress report of the U.S. Special Virus

program, HIV/AIDS is a recombinant (virus) agent that has been formed

by converging a leukemia and a lymphoma. See page 2. The United

States concedes that it is seeking to make a candidate human virus.

Id. In 1984, (alleged) co-discoverers of HIV/AIDS, Drs. Robert Gallo

and Luc Montagnue, concluded the original name of HIV/AIDS is

LEUKEMIA/LYMPHOMA virus. See, Montagnue, L. & Gallo, R.C., et. al.,

Human T-Cell Leukemia Lymphoma Virus Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory,

(Cold Spring Harbor, NY, 1984). Additionally, the United States

admits that the nazi sheep virus visna, had not yet appeared in human

disease. See page 39.

 

Today, according to all science and medical criteria, HIV/AIDS

evolved from nazi sheep visna virus and but for this litigation

defendant has yet to explain how visna virus suddenly hopped species

in the 1970. In this regard, the U.S. General Accounting Office began

an investigation into the U.S. origin of HIV/AIDS in July, 2001 at

the bequest of a Congressman.

 

Last June (2002), the GAO erroneously and inaccurately concluded,

without science citations or support, that HIV/AIDS and visna sheep

disease had evolved together over thousands of years! However the

medical and science evidence clearly shows that visna did not exist

prior to 1932 and that there was no visna in human disease as late as

1971.

 

The United States has sought to hide, dispel, distract and mislead

any serious inquiry into the U.S. Special Virus program at every

level and by every means necessary until this litigation. It is AIDS

co-developer himself, defendant, Robert C. Gallo who also concludes

that HIV/AIDS evolved from nazi sheep visna virus disease. See Gallo,

R.C., et. al., Science, Vol. 223, pp. 173 ­ 177, January, 1985. See

also, Proceedings of the United States of America, National Academy

of Sciences, Vol. 83, pp. 4007 ­ 4011, June, 1986, Sonigo, Cell, 1985

Aug 42(1):369 ­ 362, Nucleotide Sequence of the Visna Lentivirus:

Relationship to the HIV/AIDS Virus.

 

Moreover, it is the United States own proceedings which concludes

that because of visna (being the causative agent of HIV/AIDS), sheep,

not monkeys are the best animal model for the testing of new anti-

HIV/AIDS drugs. See, Proceedings of the United States of America,

National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 92, pp. 3283 ­ 3287, April 11,

1995. But for the defendant legal shenanigans to thwart the exposure

of the truth about the U.S. creation, production and proliferation of

HIV/AIDS, this important public matter would have surfaced long ago.

 

Plaintiff argues an Order requiring defendant to provide full

disclosure of the federal virus development program would immediately

begin the irreversible process of removing HIV/AIDS, the U.S. special

virus, from the human genome. Equally, full public disclosure would

allow for the immediate large scale dissemination of the inexpensive

U.S. cure for AIDS, U.S. patent #5676977.

 

In 1997, the U.S. awarded Rhode Island Company, Marentech the patent

for the cure for AIDS. In November, 2001, plaintiff accessed the cure

and has been free of prescription drugs for nearly two years.

Plaintiff firmly believes that others would greatly benefit from an

inexpensive AIDS treatment, patented by the United States as a cure.

Also, a review of the conference papers from the VIRUS CANCER

symposium held at M.I.T. in 1926 would shed significant science and

medical insight surrounding the United States early research into

ethnic immune-depletion (suppression) synthetic biological agents.

Additionally, plaintiff further believes the United States enacted

Executive Order 13292 on March 25, 2003 as a means to prepare itself

to further insulate the federal program that made AIDS from the

American people.

 

The plethora of U.S. documents and sworn testimony allow for any

trier of fact to conclude the HIV/AIDS pandemic is the result of

concerted science and medical efforts on the part of the United

States and others to achieve a contagious cancer that selectively

kills.

 

WHEREFORE; plaintiff prays the Court will deny defendant motion to

dismiss and grant his motion for default judgment by ordering the

immediate disclosure of all documents and records which imply a

laboratory birth of HIV/AIDS, both directly and indirectly.

 

Respectfully submitted,

 

Boyd E. Graves

4486 38th Street, Unit #1

San Diego, CA

92116619-281-8401CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE,

 

I, Boyd E. Graves, do herby certify that I served a copy of plaintiff

response inopposition to defendant motion to dismiss on:

 

John C. Ashcroft

Carol C. LawBeth

L. Levine

United States Attorneys Civil Division

880 Front Street St. Room 6293

San Diego, CA 92101-8893

 

Sent this 24th day of May 2003, via first class mail, postage

prepaid.__________________________

Boyd E. Graves,

J.D.-------------------Cell - 619-204-5683

Email - boyded2002

Web - http://www.boydgraves.com

Toll free - (800) 523-2372 Ext. 13046

 

you Prosper, even as your Soul Prospers 3John 2

 

Jennifer Ruby

 

Email advice is not a substitute for medical treatment.

 

http://www.rubysemporium.com

SymphonicHealth

http://www.lazrpulsr.com

____________