interesting perspectives in the schiavo case....

[Guest guest]

Exclusive

 

Schiavogate---The Big Cover-up

 

By June Maxam and Ginger Berlin

 

© The Empire Journal

 

“People may die during the course of abuse

investigations and the investigation may become moot”.

 

Apparently that’s what Florida’s Sixth Circuit

Court George Greer is hoping. Maybe even the judges

in the 2nd District Court of Appeals at Lakeland have

the same mindset.

 

It appears that Greer has a vested interest in the

death of Terri Schindler-Schiavo. Her death may make

moot the warranted and overdue investigations of

Greer’s own complicity in the case---alleged

violations of guardianship laws and well as the

alleged cover-up of criminal wrongdoing in the

matter---an obstruction of justice---a prosecutable

offense for which culpability will only increase with

judicial homicide.

 

Saying that that death will render the alleged

decade-long abuse of Terri Schiavo, aided and abetted

by the court as moot, Greer denied the motion of

Florida’s Department of Children and Families (DCF) to

intervene in the case of Terri Schiavo, sentenced to

die March 18 by Greer because she requires food and

water to live.

 

The plethora of alleged improprieties in the

Schiavo case gives immediate cause for the appointment

of a special prosecutor into not only the alleged

wrongdoing of Michael Schiavo but of George Greer.

The longer that Florida authorities resist in removing

Greer from the case and bench, the greater the

miscarriage of justice.

 

Conspiracy, collusion, fraud.

 

Not only has Greer unlawfully become a party to

the action by acting as both jurist and guardian ad

litem in the case but he, like Michael Schiavo and his

attorney, George Felos, may need to insure that

Terri Schiavo dies and her body immediately cremated

in order to destroy evidence of not only the alleged

criminal wrongdoing of Michael Schiavo but perhaps by

Greer himself in impeding and interfering in valid

abuse investigations.

 

And then there’s the guardianship issue.

 

According to an investigation conducted by The

Empire Journal, not only has Michael Schiavo allegedly

egregiously violated the guardianship laws of the

State of Florida, but so has Greer. By refusing to

act on the petitions submitted by Terri’s parents to

remove the estranged husband as the guardian, Greer

has violated his statutory duties as well as aided in

the alleged abuse, neglect and exploitation of the

ward.

 

Greer has steadfastly dodged the guardianship

issue, refusing to rule on petitions to remove Schiavo

as guardian of the person of Terri Schiavo, abdicating

the duties of the judicial office as well as his

position on the Sixth Circuit Committee on

Guardianship Monitoring.

 

 

 

Condoned Medicare Fraud

 

In addition, with the knowledge that Terri Schiavo

is not terminal, Greer has actually condoned and

participated in a fraud of the federal and state

governments, becoming partners with Michael Schiavo

and others to allegedly engage in Medicare and

Medicaid fraud by allowing the placement of Terri in

a hospice without proper certification. He has also

repetitively allowed Michael Schiavo to violate the

statutory filing requirements under guardianship laws

regarding the physical and mental condition of his

ward, Terri Schiavo. Although he claims that he has

ruled on the subject previously, each year that

Schiavo fails to file the requisite reports and

accountings constitutes a new violation, grounds for

his removal as guardian.

 

At an evidentiary hearing before Greer in October,

2002, Dr. Victor Gambone, former attending physician

of Terri Schiavo, testified under oath that his

patient was not terminal and that was not in any sort

of health crisis. At that time, Terri Schiavo had

been a resident of Hospice of Florida Suncoast for

over two years unlawfully as the requisite

certification of her terminal illness had not been

filed.

 

But instead of reporting the alleged fraud, Greer

allegedly became an accomplice to it, granting the

husband’s petition to enroll Terri into a Medicaid

program for her stay at the hospice.

 

On Nov. 15, 2002, Patricia Anderson, attorney for

the Schindlers, filed with Greer a petition to remove

Michael Schiavo as guardian. The petition included a

declaration of adversary proceedings charging that the

husband had violated a dozen or more Florida Statutes.

As of this date, more some 2 ½ years later, Greer has

never ruled on the motion---in violation of state law.

But then there if a hearing was conducted as required,

there would be only one way to rule on the motion---to

remove Schiavo as guardian.

 

On Jan. 10, attorneys for Mary and Robert Schindler

Sr. renewed their petition for the removal of Schiavo

as guardian of their daughter and as this date, Greer

has failed to rule on that motion too, in direct

contravention of Florida Statutes. By refusing to

conduct the required hearing on the issue and

addressing the blatant violations of state law, Greer

is not only aiding and abetting Michael Schiavo and

George Felos but he is a lawbreaker himself, a

violation of public trust and the oath of office that

he presumably took and filed.

 

“My oath is to follow the law and if I can’t follow

the law, I need to step down”.

 

According to review of Greer’s handling of the

Schiavo case conducted by The Empire Journal, Greer

has consistently failed to follow the law and needs to

hang up the black robe.

 

Instead of serving to protect the assets of

incapacitated persons such as the disabled and the

elderly, the existing guardianship system in Florida

and particularly in Pinellas County presents the

opportunity for unscrupulous guardians to loot the

assets of their wards and enrich themselves with the

complete blessing of the court.

 

No Report, No Authority

 

Pursuant to Chapter 744 of Florida Statutes, each

guardian, whether non-professional or professional, is

required to file an annual guardianship report, plan

and accounting. By law, the court retains

jurisdiction over all guardians. The court, and that

includes Greer, is required to review “the

appropriateness and extent of a guardianship annually

and if an objection to terms of the guardianship has

been filed, if interim review requested, if the

guardianship report has not been received and the

guardian has failed to respond to a show cause order”.

 

Unless the court requires filing on a calendar-year

basis, each guardian of the person, such as Schiavo,

is required to file with the court an annual

guardianship plan within 90 days after the last day of

the anniversary month the letters of guardianship were

signed, and the plan must cover the coming fiscal

year. If calendar year filing is required, the

guardianship plan must be file within 90 days after

the end of the calendar year---or in the case of

2004----on March 30, two weeks after Greer has decreed

that the death order be executed.

 

The annual accounting must also be filed at this

time by the guardian of the person.

 

The guardian of the property, who in the Schiavo

case is Alyson Carpenter according to Ken Burke, clerk

of the Sixth Circuit Court, must also file an annual

accounting. The annual report of a guardian of the

person of an incapacitated person must consist of an

annual guardianship plan. The annual report is

required to be served on the ward and on the attorney

for the ward. The guardian is required to provide a

copy to any other person as the court may direct.

Unless the ward is a minor or has been determined to

be totally incapacitated, the guardian is required to

review a copy of the annual report with the ward, to

the extent possible. Within 30 days after the annual

report has been filed, any interested person,

including the ward, may file written objections to any

element of the report specifying the nature of the

objection.

 

Section 744.3685 states that if the guardian fails

to file the annual guardianship report, as it is

alleged in the Schiavo case, Greer is required to

order the guardian to file the report within 15 days

after the service of an order on him to show cause why

he shouldn’t be compelled to do so. If the guardian

fails to file the report within the time specified

without good cause, the court may cite him for

contempt.

 

However, in the case of Greer, he has failed to

exercise his mandate and instead of ordering Schiavo

to comply with the law or show cause why he shouldn’t

have to, Greer ignores his responsibility under the

law and allows Schiavo to escape the filing

requirement.

 

If an annual report is not timely filed, the law

states the court “shall”, not permissive but

mandatory, order the guardian to file the report or

show cause why it is not timely filed. The court is

required by law to review the initial and annual

guardianship report to determine that the report meets

the needs of the ward, authorizes a guardian to act

only in areas in which the adult ward has been

declared incapacitated and conforms to all other

requirements of law.

 

In the case of Schiavo, Greer has allegedly taken

no steps as required to force Schiavo to file the

requisite reports and obviously in the absence of the

reports being filed, Greer fails to exercise his

statutory duties of reviewing the report. Without the

report being filed or being reviewed as required,

Greer in essence is not only allowing Schiavo to

violate the guardianship laws but he himself is

actually becoming a party to allowing the abuse,

neglect and exploitation to occur and continue

unaddressed.

 

Greer has consistently refused to consider the

allegations of abuse even in light of the massive

evidence presented to him.

 

By law, if an objection is filed to a report, (or

the lack of the guardian to file the mandated report)

the court is required by law to set the matter for

hearing and conduct hearing within 30 days after

filing of objection.

 

Greer Violating Guardianship Law Too

 

Greer is in violation of this section of

guardianship law too as he has failed to conduct a

hearing on the Nov. 2002 motion or the Jan. 11, 2005

motion.

http://www.terrisfight.org/documents/PetitionToRemoveGuardian.pdf

 

http://www.terrisfight.org/documents/Mot%20Dism%20Pet%20Rem%20Guard%20120602.pdf

 

 

Among the issues in the petition for the removal of

Schiavo is his abandonment of the marriage, failure to

provide the ward with her rights including independent

legal counsel, palliative care and rehabilitation

services; failure to file valid guardianship plans and

mismanagement of the ward’s assets.

 

There are a number of reasons provided for the

removal of a guardian. Among those in the case of

Michael Schiavo are a material failure to comply with

the guardianship report by the guardian; failure to

comply with rules for timely filing the initial and

annual reports; failure to fulfill guardianship

education requirements; fraud in obtaining her or her

appointment; failure to discharge her or his duties;

abuse of his powers; wasting, embezzlement or other

mismanagement of ward’s property; development of

conflict of interest between ward and guardian;

improper management of ward’s assets

 

After the mandated hearing is held, the court

shall enter a written order either approving or

ordering modifications to the report. Greer has

failed to do this too.

 

By law, the approved report constitutes the

authority for guardian to act in the forthcoming year.

The powers of guardian are initiated by terms of the

report. The annual report may not grant additional

authority to guardian without a hearing as provided.

In the absence of Schiavo and Felos filing an annual

report and accounting, Schiavo has no legal authority

to act as a guardian in that year-----a ongoing

violation which seems to have been unlawfully endorsed

by Greer. By failing to take action against Schiavo

to force him to comply with the law, the court is

aiding and abetting Schiavo in violating the

law----hardly a role that a judge should

play---particularly when the stakes are a sentence of

death..

 

Any initial, annual or final guardianship report is

subject to investigation only by the court, clerk of

the court or clerk’s representative, the guardian, the

guardian’s attorney, the ward and the ward’s attorney.

By failing to appoint independent counsel for Terri,

Greer has also violated that law.

 

According to Section 744.3715, at any time any

interested person, including the ward, may petition

the court for review, alleging that the guardian is

not complying with guardianship plans or is exceeding

authority under guardianship plan, and that the

guardian is not acting in best interest of the ward.

The petition must state the nature of objection to the

guardian’s action or proposed action. Upon the filing

of such petition court is required by law to review

the petition and act on it expeditiously.

 

Greer has consistently refused to do so, violating

the law himself while allowing Michael Schiavo to

violate numerous sections of state law, using the

auspices of his judicial power and resources to allow

an individual to break the law which in the case of

Terri Schiavo, is against the best interests of the

ward, the interests that Greer is sworn to protect.

Instead, he has ordered her death to allegedly

cover-up the wrongdoings of not only Michael Schiavo

and others involved in the case, but himself.

 

Terri Schiavo collapsed amidst mysterious

circumstances at her home on Feb. 25, 1990, during a

time when witnesses say there had been on ongoing

situation of argument and strife and possible domestic

violence. The only person at the home at the time of

her collapse which resulted in a lack of oxygen to the

brain, causing serious brain damage, was her husband.

 

Within 48 hours after she had been admitted to the

hospital, her husband’s employer, the owner of a

restaurant, arrived at the hospital. Daniel Grieco,

also an attorney, consulted with Terri’s parents

outside the Intensive Care Unit waiting room,

recommending that they sign documents that would allow

Schiavo to handle Terri’s medical affairs on the

pretense it would expedite Terri’s emergency

treatment.

 

The attorney’s rationale was since Terri was barely

clinging to life, vesting Michael Schiavo with this

power would expedite her medical care. Grieco did not

mention that Schiavo would have exclusive power to

dictate Terri’s medical treatment and the authority to

control the release of any medical information

concerning Terri.

 

Another Greer Contributor

 

Since there are no documents in Terri’s legal case

files regarding this meeting with Daniel Grieco, that

agreement may have been designed as a short term

control solution. Notably, the document allowed

Schaivo to conceal Terri’s hospital admittance records

and the ability to filter all of the doctor’s

information. (Daniel Grieco was a $300 contributor to

the 2004 election campaign of Judge Greer)

 

As an example, on March 5, 1991, just 53 weeks

after Terri’s collapse, a bone scan taken of Terri

revealed a healed broken right femur bone and healed

bone fractures in her ribs, pelvis, spine and ankle.

The radiologist, Dr. Walker, concluded that “Terri has

a history of trauma” and presumed “that the other

multiple areas of abnormal activity also relate to

previous trauma”. WALKER PDF & Bone Scan

 

Despite testimony and sworn affidavits by

caregivers attesting to the alleged abuse, neglect and

exploitation of Terri Schiavo allegedly at the hands

of Michael Schiavo, Greer has steadfastly refused to

consider any of the allegations.

 

An orthopedic surgeon, Dr. Hamilton, initially saw

Terri a few months after she collapsed. Schiavo never

disclosed this information to any of the Schinder

family.

 

On June 18, 1990, after a conducted investigation

declaring Terri incapacitated, a hearing was held in a

St. Petersburg courtroom appointing Michael Schiavo as

Terri’s legal guardian.

 

The St. Petersburg court files state that Terri’s

parents were notified by mail of these events,

including the hearing, and had no objections to

Michael Schiavo being appointed legal guardian.

 

Terri’s parents emphatically state that they did

not know of the investigation which concluded that

Terri was incapacitated or the subsequent court

hearing and were never notified.

 

Additionally, there is no evidence of any

documentation in Terri’s legal case files verifying

that Terri’s parents supported Michael Schiavo’s

guardianship appointment, other than a reference that

Terri’s parents were in agreement. It should be noted

that during this 1990 time frame, Terri’s parents were

in daily contact with Michael Schiavo and nothing was

ever mentioned regarding these court proceedings by

Schiavo or his attorney. The entire legal guardianship

transaction was handled by attorney Daniel Grieco who

later contributed to Greer’s election campaign as did

each one of the attorneys representing Michael

Schiavo.

 

In fact, not only did Hamdin Baskin III contribute

the maximum of $500 to Greer’s campaign, but so did

his law partner, Joseph Fleece, thereby the law firm

of Baskin and Fleece contributed a total of $1,000 to

Greer’s reelection at the time Baskin was representing

Michael Schiavo in the guardianship proceeding before

Greer.

 

In 1993, the Schindlers filed a petition in

Pinellas Circuit Court, to have Michael Schiavo

removed as Terri’s guardian, claiming he was

compromised by the money he had been awarded as the

result of medical malpractice claims against doctors

who had been treating Terri prior to her collapse, and

that he was no longer acting in her best interest.

 

In August, 1992, Terri was awarded $250,000 in a

settlement by the insurance company of Dr. Joel Prawer

who was later cleared by the state Department of

Health of all negligence in the case. In November,

1992, she was awarded $1.4 million following the

malpractice trial of Dr. Stephen Igel and Schiavo

himself was awarded $600,000 for loss of consortium,

giving him a sum of $2.25 million.

 

A probate judge dismissed the case after an

independent guardian ad litem issued a report stating

that he was acting in her best interests.

 

For the next five years, the Schindlers were

unsuccessful in their legal maneuvers to get Terri’s

medical records and take over their daughter’s

guardianship. Meanwhile, Michael Schiavo became

involved with another woman. They became engaged in

1996 and have two children together.

 

In 1998, Schiavo filed a petition to have Terri’s

nutrition and hydration tube removed. The case when

to trial in February, 2000 before Greer as the probate

judge handling guardianship matters. Based on

self-serving hearsay evidence by Michael Schiavo,

inadmissible by law, Greer ruled that there was “clear

and convincing” evidence that Terri Schiavo would not

want to receive assisted feeding and on Feb. 11, 2000,

signed her death order allowing her guardian, Michael

Schiavo to remove the assisted feeding which will

cause her death by starvation.

 

Circuit Investigates Guardians Annually

 

According to the newsletter of the Sixth Judicial

Circuit, the circuit investigates guardians at least

once a year as part of the court’s responsibility in

ensuring that the best interests of the wards are

being met. For non-professional guardians, such as

Michael Schiavo, the reinvestigations are due at the

time of filing of the annual accounting or if the time

to file has been extended, then when the annual

accounting is filed with the annual plan.

 

However, there is no indication that the court has

ever conducted an annual investigation of Michael

Schiavo.

 

The court---and that includes Greer---is required

by statute to review both the guardianship accounting

and plan. The monitoring of a guardianship begins at

the initial filing with the court. Following the

initial investigation and filing by the guardian,

according to the newsletter, the court conducts a

follow-up investigation on an annual basis to insure

that parties remain qualified under the law to protect

the rights, health and safety of the individual. A

$50 statutory annual fee is required for the initial

investigation and annually thereafter for the guardian

of the person and property and guardian of the

property alone. The fee for guardian of the person,

such as Schiavo, is $ $25 upon filing and annually

thereafter. Professional guardians are required to

pay the fee annually and not for every case.

 

The court is also required to audit all

guardianship reports----therefore, the court must

insure that all reports are filed. In addition, the

court must also conduct random comprehensive filed

audits to ensure that the guardians are acting

appropriate regarding their activities to court

accurately. It is the court role of protecting

citizens and assist state in meeting the needs of

elderly and incapacitated population but apparently in

the case of Greer, not only has allowed Michael

Schiavo to violate the guardianship laws by not filing

the requisite accountings, plans and reports, but

Greer himself has failed to comply with the law.

 

The guardianship court monitor investigates when

appointed by the probate judge to look into a

particular guardianship case. The monitor reviews al

internal, annual and interim guardianship rights and

reports the findings to the court.

 

Even though Greer has failed to comply with the law

in ensuring that Michael Schiavo is accountable to the

court in protecting the interests of the ward by his

required annual filings, Schiavo is also accountable

to the clerk of circuit court who is now Ken Burke.

 

Burke took office Jan. 1 after Karleen DeBlaker

retired after more than 20 years in the position.

 

Clerk Required To Do Annual Review

 

Burke as clerk of the Sixth Judicial Circuit is

required by law to review each initial and annual

guardianship report to ensure it contains information

about the ward; physical and mental health care,

personal and social services, the residential setting,

application of insurance, private benefits and

government benefits, and physical and mental health

exams.

 

The clerk also undertakes an initial verified

inventory of the annual accounting and is mandated by

law within 30 days after the date of filing of initial

or annual report of the guardian of the person

complete his or her review of the report.

 

Within 90 days of the filing of the initial or

annual guardianship report by the guardian, he is

required to audit the verified inventory or annual

accounting and is mandated to advise the court of the

results of audit. The clerk shall report to the court

when a report is not timely filed.

 

Therefore, by law, not only is Michael Schiavo

required to file an annual guardianship plan and

accounting, but the court clerk is required to audit

same and that audit is part of the public record and

subject to public scrutiny and review.

http://myfloridalegal.com/ago.nsf/Opinions/0CAC9D4B79C9A8B985256EC5005D3AED

 

 

“Guardianship is an area ripe for fraud and where

most fraud abuse has in fact occurred”, DeBlaker has

said. Particularly critical of the way that the Sixth

Circuit Court judges handle guardianships is Robert W.

Melton, chief deputy director internal audit division,

certified public accountant, certified fraud examiner

with the Pinellas County Circuit Court. During public

hearings conducted by the Florida Guardian Task Force

appointed by Florida legislators to address

guardianship reform, Melton testified that in his

office was being “stonewalled” in their attempts to

audit guardianship.

 

According to a report appearing in the April, 2004

issued of the Gulf Coast Business Review by Francis

Gilpin, associate editor, Melton told the task force

that “In Pinellas County, attempts are being made to

limit the clerk’s authority”, a county where George

Greer is the Administrative Judge of the Probate

Division. “This ranges from guardians that refuse to

submit to an audit unless a court order is received,

to judges that question the authority of the clerk to

use professional auditing staff to conduct the

audits”.

 

While Melton advocates opening the guardianship

process to public review, Greer is opposed to that

practice. Melton said openness would be one way to

prevent improprieties, making public the initial

inventories of wards’ estates and the annual

accountings of assets that guardians are required to

file with the court. “The lack of public scrutiny

breeds misdeeds and misappropriations because people

who may know the truth would not have access”,

according to Melton.

 

Greer has reportedly said that he sees more potential

for financial abuse by immediate family members who

create guardianships or gain power of attorney status

than by professional guardians. Melton told the task

force that there have been times when a Pinellas

judge, whom he did not name, has prevented clerk’s

auditors from examining the entire record of a

guardianship case.

 

Melton told the task force that the assets of wards

are being transferred into pooled trusts that he says

operate imprudently outside the supervision of the

courts. He adds that the real estate of wards is

being sold at below-market prices to land trusts whose

owners don’t have to be disclosed. Pooled trusts are

promoted as a legal method for wards to maintain

Medicaid eligibility in nursing homes, according to

Melton.

 

“When we have both guardians and judges trying to

keep auditors out, we have a system ripe for

corruption and fraud”, Melton said.

 

Former chief Judge F. Dennis Alvarez of the 13th

Circuit, Hillsborough County, says that Pinellas

County has historically resisted guardianship reform.

Perhaps that’s because there’s big money to be made

among lawyers and other players in

guardianships---particularly in the disposition of

assets of wards including real and personal property

including real estate, jewelry and antiques in

addition to the guardian fees.

 

Melton says that Pinellas judges, which include

George Greer, not only keep court records hidden from

public view but are anxious to extend the cloak of

secrecy to the audits. In February, 2004, Melton

recommended to Chief Judge David Demers that he take a

closer look at guardianships in the Sixth Circuit.

 

Greer recently unsuccessfully challenged Demers for

the position of chief judge of the circuit.

 

In 2002, the same year as Schindlers filed their

previous petition before Greer for the removal of

Schiavo, ignored by Greer, court auditors concluded

that court officials had failed to monitor

guardianships carefully. The clerk’s office, which

systematically reviews about 2,400 guardianships in

Pinellas County annual, set up a fraud hotline. Te

report suspected fraud in a guardianship to county

auditors, call 727-453-3728.

 

While conducting audits of guardianship reports,

the Pinellas clerk’s office discovered serious

irregularities. Pinellas County state attorney Bernie

McCabe confirmed in 2003 that a preliminary inquiry

had been initiated by his office into selected

Pinellas guardianships. However, despite the by then

well-publicized failure of Michael Schiavo to file his

required guardianship plans and accountings, McCabe

took no action in that case. He opened an inquiry

into Adult Comprehensive Protection Services which

managed the assets of 300 of the county’s elderly and

infirm and which had allegedly mismanaged the funds of

some of the county’s most vulnerable residents.

 

The inquiry was stonewalled when the ACPS attorney

denied access to minutes of the agency’s board of

directors. The attorney was Richard Pearse, the

former guardian ad litem in the Terri Schiavo case

Pearse had recommended that the feeding tube not be

removed in his GAL report to Greer in 1999.

Thereafter, Schiavo petitioned Greer for Pearse’s

removal as GAL and Greer complied. Since then, Greer

has refused to appoint a new guardian ad litem, acting

in the role himself---prohibited by Canon 3 of the

state Code of Judicial Conduct. No judge may serve as

a guardian unless the ward is a member of his own

family.

 

Melton and other critics say the court system

favors the guardian. When court challenges are raised

to a guardianship as in the Schiavo case, the proof

needed by the petitioner is in documents which are

sealed by the court---and Greer----claiming its for

the protection of the ward. When complaints are made

to law enforcement agencies such as in the Schiavo

case, officials such as McCabe---with a prohibited

conflict of interest with Greer, and former Sheriff

Everett Rice who also had a prohibited conflict of

interest with Greer as well as being a member of the

board of directors of the Hospice Foundation of

Florida Suncoast, a subsidiary of the corporation

operating the hospice where Terri Schiavi is a

resident, claim it’s a civil matter being handled by

the courts.

 

According to critics, guardianships are based on

the assumption that the court will provide oversight,

the guardian will be honest and discharge his duties

toward the ward responsibly.

 

“When we have both guardians and judges trying to

keep the auditors out, we have a system ripe for

corruption and fraud”, De Blaker and Melton told the

task force. “The practices I have seen in the short

time I have been involved in guardianships is

shocking”, Melton said. “It’s time to put an end to

unscrupulous practices at the expense of our state’s

most vulnerable citizens”.

 

Politically connected attorneys who stand to profit

handsomely from guardianship fees are involved with

alleged guardianship abuse. In Greer’s 2004

reelection campaign, a massive $144,000 was raised in

campaign contributions, said to be the largest amount

ever raised in a judicial campaign. More than half of

those contributors were attorneys----attorneys whose

practices in real estate, probate, wills and elder law

stand to profit greatly from guardianships to which

they are court appointed by probate judges such as

George W. Greer. .

 

 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 

" Friends don't let friends use Internet Explorer. "

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mail - Find what you need with new enhanced search.

http://info.mail./mail_250