[SecretsRevealed] Deadly Diabetes Deception

[Guest guest]

Comments?

Misty L. Trepke

http://www..com

 

Our Deadly Diabetes Deception " [long, but very INSIGHTFUL]

 

Our Deadly Diabetes Deception

By Thomas Smith

10-18-4

 

Diabetes introduction

 

If you are an American diabetic, your physician will never tell you

that most diabetes is curable. In fact, if you even mention the cure

word around him, he will likely become upset and irrational. His

medical school training only allows him to respond to the word

treatment.

 

For him, the cure word does not exist. Diabetes, in its modern

epidemic form, is a curable disease and has been for at least 40

years.

 

In 2001, the most recent year for which figures US figures are

posted, 934,550 Americans died from out of control symptoms of this

disease.[1]

 

Your physician will also never tell you that at one time strokes,

both ischemic and hemorrhagic, heart failure due to neuropathy as

well as both ischemic and hemorrhagic coronary events, obesity,

atherosclerosis, elevated blood pressure, elevated cholesterol,

elevated triglycerides, impotence, retinopathy, renal failure, liver

failure, polycystic ovary syndrome, elevated blood sugar, systemic

candida, impaired carbohydrate metabolism, poor wound healing,

impaired fat metabolism, peripheral neuropathy as well as many more

of today's disgraceful epidemic disorders were once well understood

to often be but symptoms of diabetes.

 

If you contract diabetes and depend upon orthodox medical treatment,

sooner or later you will experience one or more of its symptoms as

the disease rapidly worsens. It is now common practice to refer to

these symptoms as if they were separable independent diseases with

separate unrelated proprietary treatments provided by competing

medical specialists.

 

It is true that many of these symptoms can and sometimes do result

from other causes; however, it is also true that this fact has been

used to disguise the causative role of diabetes and to justify

expensive, ineffective treatments for these symptoms.

 

Epidemic Type II Diabetes is curable. By the time you get to the end

of this article you are going to know that. You're going to know why

it isn't routinely being cured. And, you're going to know how to

cure it. You are also probably going to be angry at what a handful

of greedy people have surreptitiously done to the entire orthodox

medical community and to its trusting patients.

 

The diabetes industry

 

Today's diabetes industry is a massive community that has grown step

by step from its dubious origins in the early twentieth century. In

the last eighty years it has become enormously successful at

shutting out competitive voice that attempt to point out the fraud

involved in modern diabetes treatment.

 

It has matured into a religion. And, like all religions, it depends

heavily upon the faith of the believer. So successful has it become

that it verges on blasphemy to suggest that, in most cases, the

kindly high priest with the stethoscope draped prominently around

his neck is a charlatan and a fraud.

 

In the large majority of cases he has never cured a single case of

diabetes in his entire medical career.

 

The financial and political influence of this medical community has

almost totally subverted the original intent of our regulatory

agencies. They routinely approve death dealing ineffective drugs

with insufficient testing.

 

Former commissioner of the FDA, Dr. Herbert Ley, in testimony before

a US Senate hearing, commented " People think the FDA is protecting

them. It isn't. What the FDA is doing and what the public thinks its

doing are as different as night and day. " [2]

 

The financial and political influence of this medical community

dominates our entire medical insurance industry. Although this is

beginning to change, in America, it is still difficult to find

employer group medical insurance to cover effective alternative

medical treatments.

 

Orthodox coverage is standard in all states. Alternative medicine is

not. For example there are only 1400 licensed naturopaths in 11

states compared to over 3.4 million orthodox licensees in 50 states.

[3] Generally, only approved treatments from licensed credentialed

practitioners are insurable.

 

This, in effect, neatly creates a special kind of money that can only

be spent within the orthodox medical and drug industry.

 

No other industry in the world has been able to manage the politics

of convincing people to accept so large a part of their pay in a form

that does not allow them to spend it on health care as they see fit.

Insurance money can only be spent within an industry that has banned

the cure word from its vocabulary.

 

The financial and political influence of this medical community

completely controls virtually every diabetes publication in the

country. Many diabetes publications are subsidized by ads for

diabetes supplies. No diabetes editor is going to allow the truth to

be printed in his magazine.

 

This is why the diabetic only pays about 1/4 to 1/3 of the cost of

printing the magazine he depends upon for accurate information. The

rest is subsidized by ads purchased by diabetes manufacturers with a

vested commercial interest in preventing diabetics from curing their

diabetes. When looking for a magazine that tells the truth about

diabetes, look first to see if it is full of ads for diabetes

supplies.

 

And then there are the various associations that solicit annual

donations to find a cure for their proprietary disease. Every year

they promise a cure is just around the corner; just send more money.

Some of these very same associations have been clearly implicated in

providing advice that promotes the progress of diabetes in their

trusting supporters.

 

For example, for years they heavily promoted exchange diets [4] which

are in fact scientifically worthless, as anyone who has ever tried to

use them quickly finds out. They have ridiculed the use of glycemic

tables which are actually very helpful to the diabetic.

 

They promoted the use of margarine as heart healthy long after it

was well understood that margarine causes diabetes and promotes

heart failure. [5] Why everyone expects that these tax free

associations will really self destruct by eliminating their

proprietary disease and thereby destroy their only source of income

is truly amazing.

 

If people ever wake up to the cure for diabetes that has been

suppressed for forty years, these associations will soon be out of

business. But until then, they nonetheless continue to need our

support.

 

For forty years medical research has consistently shown, with

increasing clarity, that type II diabetes is a degenerative disease

directly caused by an engineered food supply that is focused on

profit instead of health. Although the diligent can readily glean

this information from a wealth of medical research literature, it is

generally otherwise unavailable.

 

Certainly this information has been, and remains, largely unavailable

in the medical schools that train our retail doctors.

 

Prominent among the causative agents in our modern diabetes epidemic

are the engineered fats and oils sold in today's supermarkets.

 

The first step to curing diabetes is to stop believing the lie that

the disease is incurable.

 

Diabetes history

 

In 1922, three Canadian Nobel prize winners, Banting, Best and

Macleod were successful in saving the life of a fourteen year old

diabetic girl in Toronto General Hospital with injectable insulin.

[6] Eli Lilly was licensed to manufacture this new wonder drug and

the medical community basked in the glory of a job well done.

 

It wasn't until 1933 that rumors about a new rogue diabetes

surfaced. This was in a paper presented by Joslyn, Dublin and Marks

and printed in the American Journal of Medical Sciences. This

paper " Studies on Diabetes Mellitus " [7], discussed the emergence of

a major US epidemic of a disease which looked very much like the

diabetes of the early 1920's only it did not respond to the wonder

drug, insulin. Even worse, sometimes insulin treatment killed the

patient.

 

This new disease became known as Insulin Resistant Diabetes because

it had the elevated blood sugar symptom of diabetes, but responded

poorly to insulin therapy.

 

Many physicians had considerable success in treatment of this disease

by diet. A great deal was learned about the relationship between

diet and diabetes in the 1930's and 1940's.

 

Diabetes, which had a per capita incidence of 0.0028% at the turn of

the century, had by 1933, zoomed 1000% in the US to become a disease

faced by many doctors [8]. This disease, under a variety of aliases,

was destined to go on to wreck the health of over half of the

American population and to incapacitate almost 20% by the 1990's. [9]

 

In 1950 the medical community became able to perform serum insulin

assays.

 

This quickly revealed that the disease wasn't classical diabetes.

This new disease was characterized by sufficient, often excessive,

blood insulin levels.

 

The problem was that the insulin was ineffective; it did not reduce

blood sugar.

 

But, since the disease had been known as diabetes for almost twenty

years it was renamed Type II Diabetes. This was to distinguish it

from the earlier Type 1 Diabetes which was due to insufficient

insulin production by the pancreas.

 

Had the dietary insights of the previous 20 years dominated the

medical scene from this point and into the late 1960's, diabetes

would have become widely recognized as curable instead of merely

treatable. Unfortunately this didn't happen and so, in 1950, a

search was launched for another wonder drug to deal with the Type II

Diabetes problem.

 

Cure vs treatment

 

This new ideal wonder drug would be, like insulin, effective in

remitting obvious adverse symptoms of the disease, but not effective

in curing the underlying disease. Thus, it would be needed

continually for the remaining life of the patient. It would have to

be patentable; that is, it could not be a natural medication because

these are non-patentable.

 

Like insulin, it would be highly profitable to manufacture and

distribute. Mandatory government approvals would be required to

stimulate the use by physicians as a prescription drug. Testing

required for these approvals would have to be enormously expensive to

prevent other, unapproved, medications from becoming competitive.

 

This is the origin of the classic medical protocol of " treating the

symptoms " .

 

By doing this, both the drug company and the doctor could prosper in

business and the patient, while not being cured of his disease, was

sometimes temporarily relieved of some of his symptoms.

 

Additionally, natural medications that actually cured disease, would

have to be suppressed. The more effective they were, the more they

would need to be suppressed and their proponents jailed as quacks.

After all, it wouldn't do to have some cheap effective natural

medication cure disease in a capital intensive monopoly market

specifically designed to treat symptoms without curing disease.

 

Often the natural substance really did cure disease. This is why the

force of law was used to drive the natural, often superior,

medicines from the market place, to remove the cure word from the

medical vocabulary and to totally undermine the very concept of a

free marketplace in the medical business.

 

Now it is clear why the cure word is so vigorously suppressed by law.

The FDA has extensive Orwellian regulations that prohibit the use of

the cure word to describe any competing medicine or natural

substance. It is precisely because many natural substances do

actually both cure and prevent disease that this word has become so

frightening to the drug and orthodox medical community.

 

The commercial value of symptoms

 

After this redesign of drug development policy to focus on

ameliorating symptoms rather than curing disease, it became

necessary to reinvent the way drugs were marketed. This was done in

1949 in the midst of a major epidemic of insulin resistant diabetes.

 

In 1949, the US medical community reclassified the symptoms of

diabetes, [10] along with many other disease symptoms, into diseases

in their own right.

 

With this reclassification as the new basis for diagnosis, competing

medical specialty groups quickly seized upon related groups of

symptoms as their own proprietary symptom set. Thus the heart

specialist, endocrinologist, allergist, kidney specialist, and many

others started to treat the symptoms for which they felt

responsible.

 

As the underlying cause of the disease was widely ignored, all focus

on actually curing anything was completely lost. By this new focus on

treating symptoms, instead of curing disease, disease was now allowed

to run rampant without any effective check on its progress.

 

While not a very smart idea from the patients viewpoint, it did

succeed in making the American medical community amongst the

wealthiest in the world because of the continuing high volume of

repeat business that it promoted Heart failure for example, which

had previously been understood to often be but a symptom of

diabetes, now became a disease not directly connected to diabetes.

 

It became fashionable to think that diabetes " increased cardio-

vascular risk. " The causal role of a failed blood sugar control

system in heart failure became obscured. Consistent with the new

medical paradigm, none of the treatments offered by the heart

specialist actually cures, or is even intended to cure, their

proprietary disease.

 

For example, the three year survival rate for bypass surgery is

almost exactly the same as if no surgery was undertaken. [11]

 

Today over half of the people in America suffer from one or more

symptoms of this disease. In its beginnings, it has become well known

to physicians as Type II Diabetes, Insulin Resistant Diabetes,

Insulin Resistance, Adult Onset Diabetes, or more rarely

Hyperinsulinemia. According to the American Heart Association,

almost 50% of Americans suffer from one or more symptoms of this

disease.

 

One third of our population is morbidly obese. Half of our

population is overweight. Type II Diabetes, also called Adult Onset

Diabetes, now appears routinely in six year old children.

 

Many of our degenerative diseases can be traced to a massive failure

of our endocrine system that was well known to the physicians of the

1930's as Insulin Resistant Diabetes. This basic underlying disorder

is known to be a derangement of the blood sugar control system by

badly engineered fats and oils.

 

It is exacerbated and complicated by the widespread lack of other

essential nutrition that the body needs to cope with the metabolic

consequences of these poisons.

 

All fats and oils are not equal. Some are healthy and beneficial;

many, commonly available in the supermarket, are poisonous. The

health distinction is not between saturated and unsaturated, as the

fats and oils industry would have us believe. Many saturated oils

and fats are highly beneficial; many unsaturated oils are highly

poisonous. The important health distinction is between natural and

engineered.

 

There exists great dishonesty in advertising in the fats and oils

industry. It is aimed at creating a market for cheap junk oils such

as soy, cottonseed and rape seed oil. With an informed and aware

public these oils would have no market at all and the US, and indeed

the world, would have far less diabetes.

 

Epidemiological Life style link

 

As early as 1901, efforts had been made to manufacture and sell food

products by the use of automated factory machinery because of the

immense potential profits that were possible. Most of the early

efforts failed because people were inherently suspicious of food that

wasn't farm fresh and because the technology was poor.

 

As long as people were prosperous, suspicious food products made

little headway. Crisco, [12] the artificial shortening, was once

given away free in 2 1/2 lb cans in an unsuccessful effort to

influence the US wives to trust and buy the product in preference to

lard.

 

Margarine was introduced and was bitterly opposed by the dairy

states. With the advent of the depression of the 1930's, margarine,

Crisco and a host of other refined and hydrogenated products began

to make significant penetration into the US food markets. Support

for dairy opposition to margarine faded during WW II because there

wasn't enough butter for both the civilian population and the needs

of the military. [13] At this point, the dairy industry having lost

much support, simply accepted a diluted market share and

concentrated onsupplying the military.

 

Flax oils and fish oils, which were common in the stores and

considered a dietary staple before the American population became

diseased, have disappeared from the shelf. The last supplier of flax

oil to the major distribution chains was Archer Daniel's Midland and

they stopped producing and supplying theproduct in 1950.

 

More recently, one of the most important of the remaining genuinely

beneficial fats was subjected to a massive media disinformation

campaign that portrayed it as a saturated fat that causes heart

failure. As a result, it has virtually disappeared from the

supermarket shelves.

 

Thus was coconut oil removed from the food chain and replaced with

soy oil, cottonseed oil and rape seed oil. [14] Our parents would

never have swapped a fine healthy oil like coconut oil for these

cheap junk oils. It was shortly after this successful media blitz

that the US populace lost its war on fat.

 

For many years coconut oil had been one of our most effective dietary

weight control agents.

 

The history of the engineered adulteration of our once clean food

supply exactly parallels the rise of the epidemic of diabetes and

hyperinsulinemia now sweeping the US as well as much of the rest of

the world.

 

The second step to a cure for this disease epidemic is to stop

believing the lie that our food supply is safe and nutritious.

 

Nature of the disease

 

Diabetes is classically diagnosed as a failure of the body to

properly metabolize carbohydrates. Its defining symptom is a high

blood glucose level. Type 1 Diabetes results from insufficient

insulin production by the pancreas. Type 2 Diabetes results from

ineffective insulin. In both types, the blood glucose level remains

elevated. Neither insufficient insulin nor ineffective insulin can

limit post prandial (after eating) blood sugar to the normal range.

 

In established cases of Type 2 Diabetes, these elevated blood sugar

levels are often preceded by and accompanied by chronically elevated

insulin levels and by serious distortions of other endocrine hormonal

markers.

 

The ineffective insulin is no different from effective insulin. Its

ineffectiveness lies in the failure of our cell population to respond

to it. It is not the result of any biochemical defect in the insulin

itself. Therefore, it is appropriate to note that this disease is a

disease that affects almost every cell in the seventy trillion or so

cells of our body. All of these cells are dependent upon the food

that we eat for the raw materials that they need for self repair and

maintenance.

 

The classification of diabetes as a failure to metabolize

carbohydrates is a traditional classification that originated in the

early 19th century when little was known about metabolic diseases or

about metabolic processes. [15]

 

Today, with our increased knowledge of metabolic processes, it would

appear quite appropriate to define Type 2 Diabetes more fundamentally

as a failure of the body to properly metabolize fats and oils. This

failure results in a loss of effectiveness of insulin and in the

consequent failure to metabolize carbohydrates. Unfortunately, much

medical insight into this matter, except at the research level,

remains hampered by its 19th century legacy.

 

Thus Type II Diabetes and its early hyperinsulinemic symptoms are

whole body symptoms of this basic cellular failure to properly

metabolize glucose.

 

Each cell of our body, for reasons which are becoming clearer, find

themselves unable to transport glucose from the blood stream to their

interior. The glucose then either remains in the blood stream, is

stored as body fat or as glycogen, or is otherwise disposed of in

urine.

 

It appears that when insulin binds to a cell membrane receptor, it

initiates a complex cascade of biochemical reactions inside the

cell. This causes a class of glucose transporters known as GLUT 4

molecules to leave their parking area inside the cell and travel to

the inside surface of the plasma cell membrane.

 

When in the membrane, they migrate to special areas of the membrane

called caveolae areas. [16] There, by another series of biochemical

reactions, they identify and hook up with glucose molecules and

transport them into the interior of the cell by a process called

endocytosis. Within the cells interior, this glucose is then burned

as fuel by the mitochondria to produce energy to powercellular

activity.

 

Thus these GLUT 4 transporters lower glucose in the blood stream by

transporting it out of the bloodstream into all of our bodily cells.

 

Many of the molecules involved in these glucose and insulin mediated

pathways are lipids, that is they are fatty acids. A healthy plasma

cell membrane, now known to be an active player in the glucose

scenario, contains a complement of cis type w=3 unsaturated fatty

acids. [17] This makes the membrane relatively fluid and slippery.

When these cis fatty acids are chronically unavailable because of our

diet, trans fatty acids and short and medium chain saturated fatty

acids are substituted in the cell membrane.

 

These substitutions make the cellular membrane stiffer and more

sticky and inhibit the glucose transport mechanism. [18]

 

Thus, in the absence of sufficient cis omega 3 fatty acids in our

diet, these fatty acid substitutions take place, the mobility of the

GLUT 4 transporters is diminished, the interior biochemistry of the

cell is changed and glucose remains elevated in the bloodstream.

 

Elsewhere in the body, the pancreas secretes excess insulin, the

liver manufactures fat from the excess sugar, the adipose cells

store excess fat, the body goes into a high urinary mode,

insufficient cellular energy is available for bodily activity and

the entire endocrine system becomes distorted. Eventually pancreatic

failure occurs, body weight plummets and a diabetic crisis is

precipitated.

 

Although there remains much work to be done to fully elucidate all

of the steps in all of these pathways, this clearly marks the

beginning of a biochemical explanation for the known epidemiological

relationship between cheap engineered dietary fats and oils and the

onset of Type 2 Diabetes.

 

Orthodox medical treatment

 

After the diagnosis of diabetes, modern orthodox medical treatment

consists of either oral hypoglycemic agents or insulin.

 

n 1955, oral hypoglycemic drugs were introduced. Currently available

oral hypoglycemic agents fall into five classifications according to

their biophysical mode of action.[19] These classes are:

 

Biguanides Glucosidase inhibitors Meglitinides Sulfonylureas

Thiazolidinediones

 

The biguanides lower blood sugar in three ways. They inhibit the

normal release, by the liver, of its glucose stores, they interfere

with intestinal absorption of glucose from ingested carbohydrates

and they are said to increase peripheral uptake of glucose.

 

The glucosidase inhibitors are designed to inhibit the amylase

enzymes produced by our pancreas and which are essential to the

digestion of carbohydrates.

 

The theory is that if the digestion of carbohydrates is inhibited the

blood sugar cannot be elevated.

 

The meglitinides are designed to stimulate the pancreas to produce

insulin in a patient that likely already has an elevated level of

insulin in their bloodstream. Only rarely does the doctor even

measure insulin levels. This drug is frequently prescribed without

any knowledge of preexisting insulin levels.

 

The fact that elevated insulin levels are almost as damaging as

elevated glucose levels is widely ignored.

 

The sulfonylureas are another pancreatic stimulant class designed to

stimulate the production of insulin. Serum insulin determinations are

rarely made by the doctor before prescribing this drug. This drug is

often prescribed for type II diabetics, many of whom already have

elevated ineffective insulin.

 

These drugs are notorious for causing hypoglycemia as a side effect.

The thiazolidinediones are famous for causing liver cancer. One of

them, Rezulin, was approved in the USA through devious political

infighting but failed to get approval in England because it was

known to cause liver cancer.

 

The first doctor that had responsibility to approve it at the FDA

refused to do so. It was only after he was replaced by a more

compliant official that Rezulin gained approval by the FDA. It went

on to kill well over 100 diabetes patients and cripple many others

before the fight to get it off the market was finally won.

 

Rezulin was designed to stimulate the uptake of glucose from the

bloodstream by the peripheral cells and to inhibit the normal

secretion of glucose by the liver. The politics of why this drug ever

came to market and then remained in the market for such an

unexplainable length of time with regulatory agency approval is not

clear. [20] As of April 2000 law suits commenced to clarify this

situation [21]

 

Today insulin is prescribed for both the Type I and Type II

diabetics. Injectable insulin substitutes for the insulin that the

body no longer produces.

 

Of course, this treatment, while necessary to preserving life for the

Type I diabetic, is highly questionable when applied to the Type II

diabetic. It is important to note that neither insulin nor any of

these oral hypoglycemic agents exert any curative action whatsoever

on any type of diabetes.

 

None of these medical strategies are designed to normalize the

cellular uptake of glucose by the cells that need it to power their

activity. The prognosis with this orthodox treatment is increasing

disability and early death from heart or kidney failure or the

failure of some other vital organ.

 

The third step to a cure for this disease is to become informed and

to apply an alternative methodology that is soundly based upon good

science.

 

Alternative medical treatment

 

Effective alternative treatment that directly leads to a cure is

available today for some Type I and for many Type II diabetics.

About 5% of the diabetic population suffers from Type I diabetes;

the remaining 95% suffer from Type II diabetes.[22] Gestational

diabetes is simply ordinary diabetes contracted by a woman who is

pregnant.

 

For the Type I diabetic an alternative methodology for the treatment

of Type I Diabetes was the subject of intensive research in the

early 1990's with several papers presented in the scientific

journals.

 

This was done in modern hospitals in Madras, India and subjected to

rigorous double-blind studies to prove its efficacy.[23] The protocol

operated to restore normal pancreatic beta cell function so the

pancreas could again produce insulin as it should.

 

This approach was, apparently, demonstrated to be capable of

restoring pancreatic beta cell function where it had been lost. A

major complication lies in whether the antigens that originally led

to the autoimmune destruction of these beta cells have disappeared

from or remain in the body. If they remain, a cure is less likely;

if they have disappeared, the cure is more likely.

 

This early work in Madras India has been continued in a number of

laboratories throughout the world and much of it has been published

in scientific journals.

 

If a patent search is conducted to discover research work done on

type I diabetes that never seems to make it to the marketplace, a

number of patents on herbal remedies will be found. These patents

typically make strong claims about the regeneration of pancreatic

beta cells and the restoring of them to normal function. In

particular, patent number 5,886,029 entitled " Method and composition

for treatment of diabetes " claims to restore pancreatic beta cell

function by regenerating the pancreatic beta cells.

 

This particular patent states in part:

 

The unique combination of components in the medicinal composition

leads to a regeneration of the pancreas cells which then start

producing insulin on their own. Since the composition restores normal

pancreatic function, treatment can be discontinued after between four

and twelve months.

 

For reasons which, while understandable, are not at all acceptable,

this promising line of research never matured and today can be found

only in the archives of a few obscure scientific journals and in the

patent office. Since absolutely no financial incentive exists to

cure type I diabetes, this methodology is not likely to reappear any

time soon and certainly not in the American orthodox medical

community.

 

The goal of any effective alternative program is to repair and

restore the body's own blood sugar control mechanism. It is the

malfunctioning of this mechanism that, over time, directly causes

all of the many debilitating symptoms that make orthodox treatment

so financially rewarding for the diabetes industry.

 

For Type II Diabetes, the steps in the program are: [24]

Repair the faulty blood sugar control system. This is done simply by

substituting clean healthy beneficial fats and oils in the diet for

the pristine looking but toxic trans-isomer mix found in attractive

plastic containers on room temperature supermarket shelves.

 

Consume only flax oil, fish oil and occasionally cod liver oil until

blood sugar starts to stabilize. Then add back healthy oils such as

butter, coconut oil, olive oil and clean animal fat. Read labels;

refuse to consume cheap junk oils when they appear in processed food

or on restaurant menus. Diabetics are chronically short of vitamins

and minerals; they need to add a good quality broad spectrum

supplement to the diet.

 

Control blood sugar manually during the recovery cycle. Under medical

supervision, gradually discontinue all oral hypoglycemic agents along

with any additional drugs given to counteract their side effects.

Develop natural blood sugar control by the use of glycaemic tables,

by consuming frequent small meals, by the use of fiber, by regular

post prandial exercise, and by a complete avoidance of all sugars

along with the judicious use of only non-toxic sweeteners [25]. Avoid

alcohol until blood sugar stabilizes in the normal range.

 

Avoid caffeine as well as other stimulants; they tend to trigger

sugar release by the liver. Keep score by using a pin prick type

glucose meter. Keep track of everything you do with a medical diary.

 

Restore a proper balance of healthy fats and oils when the blood

sugar controller again works.

 

Permanently remove from the diet all cheap toxic junk fats and oils

and the processed and restaurant foods that contain them. When the

blood sugar controller again starts to work correctly, gradually

introduce additional healthy foods to the diet. Test the effect of

these added foods by monitoring blood sugar levels with the pin

prick type blood sugar monitor. Be sure to include the results of

these tests in your diary also.

 

Continue the program until normal insulin values are also restored

after blood sugar levels begin to stabilize in the normal region.

Once blood sugar levels fall into the normal range the pancreas will

gradually stop over producing insulin.

 

This process will typically take a little longer and can be tested by

having your physician send a sample of your blood to a lab for a

serum insulin determination. A good idea is to wait a couple of

months after blood sugar control is restored and then have your

physician check your insulin level. It's nice to have blood sugar in

the normal range; it's even nicer to have this accomplished without

excess insulin in the bloodstream.

 

Separately repair the collateral damage done by the disease. Vascular

problems caused by a chronically elevated glucose level will normally

reverse themselves without conscious effort. The effects of

retinopathy and of peripheral neuropathy, for example, will usually

self repair. However when the fine capillaries in the basement

membranes of the kidneys begin to leak due to chronic high blood

glucose, the kidneys compensate by laying down scar tissue to prevent

the leakage. This scar tissue remains even after the diabetes is

cured and is the reason why the kidney damage is not believed to

self repair.

 

A word of warning: when retinopathy develops a temptation will exist

to have the damage repaired by laser surgery. This laser technique

stops the retinal bleeding by creating scar tissue where the leaks

have developed. This scar tissue will prevent normal healing of the

fine capillaries in the eye when the diabetes is reversed. By

reversing the diabetes instead of opting for laser surgery, there is

an excellent chance that the eye will heal completely.

 

However if laser surgery is done, this healing will always be

complicated by the scar tissue left by the laser.

 

The arterial and vascular damage done by years of elevated sugar and

insulin and by the proliferation of systemic candida will slowly

reverse due to improved diet. However, it takes many years to clean

out the arteries by this form of oral chelation. Arterial damage can

be reversed much more quickly by using intravenous chelation [26]

therapy.

 

What would normally take many years through diet alone, can often be

done in six months with intravenous therapy. This is reputed to be

effective over 80% of the time. For obvious reasons, don't expect

your doctor to approve of this, particularly if he is a heart

specialist.

 

The prognosis is usually swift recovery from the disease and

restoration of normal health and energy levels in a few months to a

year or more. The length of time that it takes to effect a cure

depends upon how long the disease was allowed to develop.

 

For those who quickly work to reverse the disease after early

discovery, the time is usually a few months or less. For those who

have had the disease for many years, this recovery time may lengthen

to a year or more.

 

Thus, there is good reason to get busy reversing this disease as soon

as it becomes clearly identified.

 

By the time you get to this point in this article, and, if we've done

a good job of explaining our diabetes epidemic, you should know what

causes it, what orthodox medical treatment is all about and why

diabetes has become a disgrace both in the US and world wide. Of

even greater importance, you have become acquainted with a self help

program that has demonstrated great potential to actually cure this

disease.

_____

Thomas Smith is a reluctant medical investigator having been forced

into curing his own diabetes because it was obvious that his doctor

would not or could not not cure it. He has published the results of

his successful diabetes investigation in his self help manual

entitled " Insulin: Our Silent Killer " written for the layman but

also widely valued by the medical practitioner.

 

 

He has also posted a great deal of useful information about this

disease on his web page at: www.Healingmatters.com.

 

1 " Fast Stats " National Center for Health Statistics " ,

eaths/Mortality Preliminary 2001 data

 

2 In response to a question from Senator Edward Long about the FDA

during US Senate hearings in 1965.

 

3 David M. Eisenberg MD, " Credentialing complementary and alternative

medical providers " , Annals of Internal Medicine, Dec 17, 2002 Vol137

No. 12 p 968

 

4 The American Diabetes Association and The American Dietetic

Association, " The Official pocket guide to diabetic exchanges " ,

Newly updated; March 1, 1998 McGraw-Hill/Contemporary Distributed

Products.

 

5 " How do I follow a Healthy diet " American Heart Association

National Center, 7272 Greenville Avenue, Dallas, Texas. 75231-4596

americanheart.org

 

6 JAC Brown., M.B., B., Chir., " Pears medical encyclopedia,

Illustrated " , 2071, p-250

 

7 Joslyn E.P., Dublin L.I., Marks H.H., " Studies on Diabetes

Mellitus " , 1933 American Journal of Medical sciences, 186:753-773

 

8 Encyclopedia Americana, Library Edition 1966 " Diabetes Mellitus " ,

Vol 9, pp 54-56

 

9 American Heart Association, " Stroke (Brain Attack), Aug 28, 1998

www.amhrt.org/ScientificHStats98/05stroke.html American Heart

Association, " Cardiovascular Disease Statistics " Aug 28, 1998

www.amhrt.org/Heart_and_Stroke_A_Z_Guide/cvds.html " Statistics

related to overweight and obesity " ,

 

http://www.niddk.nih.gov/health/nutrit/pubs/statobes.htm

http://www.winltdusa.com/about/infocenter/healthnews/articles/obesest

ats.htm

 

10 Ibid " Diabetes Mellitus " pp 54-55

 

11 The veterans administration Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery

Cooperative Study Group, " Eleven year survival in the Veterans

Administration randomized trial of coronary bypass surgery for

stable angina " Veterans Administration co-operative study, New Eng.

J Med 1984 311: 1333-1339 Coronary Artery Surgery Study, CASS " A

randomized trial of coronary artery bypass surgery: quality of life

in patients randomly assigned to treatment groups " Circulation 68

No. 5 1983 :951-960

 

12 Trager J., " The Food Chronology " , 1995, Henry Holt & Company.

N.Y., N.Y. Items listed by date.

 

13 " Margarine " , Encyclopedia Americana, Library Edition, 1966, pp

279-280

 

14 Sally Fallon, MA; Mary C. Enig, PhD, Patricia onnolly; " Nourishing

Traditions " ; Promotion Publishing, 1995 Mary C Enig PhD, F.A.C.N.,

" Coconut: In support of Good Health in the 21st Century " ; www.live

coconutoil.com/maryenig.htm

 

15 Bernardo A Houssay MD, et al; " Human Physiology " , McGraw-Hill Book

Company 1955 pp 400-421

 

16 Gustavson J, et al; " Insulin-stimulated glucose uptake involves

the transition of glucose transporters to a caveolae-rich fraction

within the plasma cell membrane: implications for type II diabetes. "

MolMed May 1996, 2(3):367-372

 

17 F Ganong MD, " Review of Medical Physiology " 19th edition William,

1999, p-9; pp 26-33 18 Pan D A, et al; " Skeletal muscle membrane

lipid composition is related to adiposity and insulin action " , J

Clin Invest, 1995 Dec;96(6): 2802-2808 19 Physicians Desk Reference,

53rd Edition, 1999

 

20 Thomas Smith, " Insulin: Our Silent Killer " , Rev. 2nd Ed. July,

2000 p20 Thomas Smith, PO Box 7685 Loveland Colorado, 80537, Tel: 1

(970) 669-9176 His website: http://www.healingmatters.com

 

21 Law Officies of Charles H Johnson & Associates. Toll free: 1 (800)

535-5727

 

22 " Diabetes Mellitus Statistics " , American Heart Association,

www.amhrt.org

 

23 Shanmugasundaram E.R.B., et al, @ Dr. Ambedkar Institute of

Diabetes, (Kilpauk Medical College Hospital), Madras. " Possible

regeneration of the Islets of Langerhans in Streptozotocin-diabetic

rats given Gymnema sylvestre leaf extractsd " , J. Ethnopharmacology

1990;30:265-279 Shanmugasundaram E.R.B., et al, " Use of Gemnema

sylvestre leaf extract in the control of blood glucose in insulin

dependent diabetes mellitus " , J. Ethanopharmacology,1990; 30:281-294

 

24 Thomas Smith, op. cit pp 97-123

 

25 Many popular artificial, sweeteners on sale in the supermarket,

are extremely poisonus and dangerous to the diabetic; indeed, many

of them are worse than the sugar the diabetic is trying to avoid.

see for example: Thomas Smith op. cit. pp 53-58

 

26 Dr. Morton Walker, Dr. Hitendra Shah, " Chelation Therapy " 1997,

Keats Publishing, Inc. 27 Pine Street (Box 876) New Cannan,

Connecticut 06840-0876 ISBN: 0-87983-730-6

 

http://www.rense.com/general58/diabetes.htm